Fair 77.0°F Fair [Forecast] :: Saturday, July 4th, 2009
Vacation Info Wedding Info Kids/Parents NEW! Pets

Cape & Islands News

The ideal newspaper should be "irreverent, rash, feisty, and really care." - Jim Bellows
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Rogers & Gray Insurance Agency
Founded over 100 years ago, provides personal and business financial planning for its clients. We were a forerunner of the financial planning movement. Today, we are one of the industry’s most innovative providers of diverse financial services. (Dennis)
Snap Fitness Center
Work out anytime, ALL the time at the Cape's ONLY 24/7 fitness center. Snap Fitness is welcoming, immaculate, and affordable. Stay Healthy. Get Fit. Be Well. NEW! Snap Members get a 10% Savings on eDiets – the award winning diet plan Visit www.eDiets.com (Sandwich)

Delahunt's status as veteran on ballot is questioned

beattyonflightdeck2
 Jeff Beatty served in the Army, with nearly ten years of active duty including time as a  Delta Force Officer.   He's shown above returning from a flight aboard an aircraft carrier.Baetty  was in the first Blackhawk shot down and the bandage is from injuries from that engagement.

Delahunt's Veteran Status Questioned
Claim of Veteran status on ballot is fraudulent says state official

Click 959 WATD to see story

South Shore radio station WATD (95.9 on the dial) has apparently nailed our incumbent US Congressman William Delahunt in a fraudulent claim as a veteran.

This is important because in Massachusetts the election laws allow the designation as "veteran" to appear after a name on the ballot.

delahunthelpingtkDelahunt's apparent fraudulent claim has already been used in the primary elections and the November 7th ballots are already printed. 

 Christine James, News Editor of WATD News said, "if this was a southern state this would be the end of Delahunt's career."

Two candidates running for office in the tenth congressional district claim to be veterans; but according to the paperwork, it looks like only one, can in fact, claim to be a veteran. And it's not the incumbent, Congressman Bill Delahunt, but his Republican challenger Jeff Beatty.

Scituate resident Rich Hagert is the State Representative of the Veteran's Party of America. He says from reviewing both candidates dd-214's (military discharge papers) Delahunt's claim that he's a veteran 'appears to be fraudulent' because most of his 180 days in the service were for training which does not count under Massachusetts General Law. Massachusetts General Law says a veteran had to have served 180 days of active duty to be called a veteran - it does not include time training as a reservist in the armed forces of the United States.

Jeff Beatty served in the Army, with nearly ten years of active duty-- including time as a Delta Force Officer.

Congressman Bill Delahunt says he is proud of his Coast Guard Reserve service.

Click here to hear the clip (mp3 format 800K) 

Read the Mass. Laws on using the term "veteran" on ballots below and here.

PART I. ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT

TITLE IV. CIVIL SERVICE, RETIREMENTS AND PENSIONS

CHAPTER 31. CIVIL SERVICE

Chapter 31: Section 1. Massachusetts General Laws
 “Veteran”, any person who:

(1) comes within the definition of a veteran appearing in the forty-third clause of section seven of chapter four; or,
(2) comes within such definition except that instead of having performed “wartime service” as defined therein, he has been awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor or one of the following campaign badges: Second Nicaraguan Campaign, Yangtze Service, Navy Occupation Service, Army of Occupation or Medal for Humane Action; or,
(3) is a person eligible to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor or one of the campaign badges enumerated in clause (2) of this paragraph and who presents proof of such eligibility which is satisfactory to the administrator.
A veteran shall not include active duty for training in the army national guard or air national guard or active duty for training as a reservist in the armed forces of the United States.
“Wartime service”, the same meaning as specified in the forty-third clause of section seven of chapter four, or active service in the armed forces of the United States in any campaign for which an award was made of any of the campaign badges enumerated in the definition of “veteran” in this section.

43rd clause, Section 7 Chapter 4:
Forty-third, "Veteran'' shall mean (1) any person, (a) whose last discharge or release from his wartime service as defined herein, was under honorable conditions and who (b) served in the army, navy, marine corps, coast guard, or air force of the United States, or on full time national guard duty under Titles 10 or 32 of the United States Code or under sections 38, 40 and 41 of chapter 33 for not less than 90 days active service, at least 1 day of which was for wartime service; provided, however, than any person who so served in wartime and was awarded a service-connected disability or a Purple Heart, or who died in such service under conditions other than dishonorable, shall be deemed to be a veteran notwithstanding his failure to complete 90 days of active service; (2) a member of the American Merchant Marine who served in armed conflict between December 7, 1941 and December 31, 1946, and who has received honorable discharges from the United States Coast Guard, Army, or Navy; (3) any person (a) whose last discharge from active service was under honorable conditions, and who (b) served in the army, navy, marine corps, coast guard, or air force of the United States for not less than 180 days active service; provided, however, that any person who so served and was awarded a service-connected disability or who died in such service under conditions other than dishonorable, shall be deemed to be a veteran notwithstanding his failure to complete 180 days of active service.
  "Wartime service'' shall mean service performed by a "Spanish War veteran'', a "World War I veteran'', a "World War II veteran'', a "Korean veteran'', a "Vietnam veteran'', a "Lebanese peace keeping force veteran'', a "Grenada rescue mission veteran'', a "Panamanian intervention force veteran'', a "Persian Gulf veteran'', or a member of the "WAAC'' as defined in this clause during any of the periods of time described herein or for which such medals described below are awarded.
  "Spanish War veteran'' shall mean any veteran who performed such wartime service between February fifteenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight and July fourth, nineteen hundred and two.
  "World War I veteran'' shall mean any veteran who (a) performed such wartime service between April sixth, nineteen hundred and seventeen and November eleventh, nineteen hundred and eighteen, or (b) has been awarded the World War I Victory Medal, or (c) performed such service between March twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred and seventeen and August fifth, nineteen hundred and seventeen, as a Massachusetts National Guardsman.
[ Definition of "World War II veteran'' in clause Forty-third effective until November 11, 2005. For text effective November 11, 2005, see below.]
  "World War II veteran'' shall mean any veteran who performed such wartime service between September sixteenth, nineteen hundred and forty and December thirty-first, nineteen hundred and forty-six--, except that for the purposes of chapter thirty-one it shall mean all active service between the dates of September sixteenth, nineteen hundred and forty and June twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred and fifty.
[ Definition of "World War II veteran'' in clause Forty-third as amended by 2005, 130, Sec. 1 effective November 11, 2005. For text effective until November 11, 2005, see above.]
  "World War II veteran'' shall mean any veteran who performed such wartime service between September 16, 1940 and July 25, 1947, and was awarded a World War II Victory Medal, except that for the purposes of chapter 31 it shall mean all active service between the dates of September 16, 1940 and June 25, 1950.
  "Korean veteran'' shall mean any veteran who performed such wartime service between June twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred and fifty and January thirty-first, nineteen hundred and fifty-five, both dates inclusive, and any person who has received the Korea Defense Service Medal as established in the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2003.
  "Korean emergency'' shall mean the period between June twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred and fifty and January thirty-first, nineteen hundred and fifty-five, both dates inclusive.
  "Vietnam veteran'' shall mean (1) any person who performed such wartime service during the period commencing August fifth, nineteen hundred and sixty-four and ending on May seventh, nineteen hundred and seventy-five, both dates inclusive, or (2) any person who served at least one hundred and eighty days of active service in the armed forces of the United States during the period between February first, nineteen hundred and fifty-five and August fourth, nineteen hundred and sixty-four; provided, however, that for the purposes of the application of the provisions of chapter thirty-one, it shall also include all active service between the dates May seventh, nineteen hundred and seventy-five and June fourth, nineteen hundred and seventy-six; and provided, further, that any such person who served in said armed forces during said period and was awarded a service-connected disability or a Purple Heart, or who died in said service under conditions other than dishonorable, shall be deemed to be a veteran notwithstanding his failure to complete one hundred and eighty days of active service.
  "Lebanese peace keeping force veteran'' shall mean any person who performed such wartime service and received a campaign medal for such service during the period commencing August twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred and eighty-two and ending when the President of the United States shall have withdrawn armed forces from the country of Lebanon.
  "Grenada rescue mission veteran'' shall mean any person who performed such wartime service and received a campaign medal for such service during the period commencing October twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred and eighty-three to December fifteenth, nineteen hundred and eighty-three, inclusive.
  "Panamanian intervention force veteran'' shall mean any person who performed such wartime service and received a campaign medal for such service during the period commencing December twentieth, nineteen hundred and eighty-nine and ending January thirty-first, nineteen hundred and ninety.
  "Persian Gulf veteran'' shall mean any person who performed such wartime service during the period commencing August second, nineteen hundred and ninety and ending on a date to be determined by presidential proclamation or executive order and concurrent resolution of the Congress of the United States.
  "WAAC'' shall mean any woman who was discharged and so served in any corps or unit of the United States established for the purpose of enabling women to serve with, or as auxiliary to, the armed forces of the United States and such woman shall be deemed to be a veteran.
  None of the following shall be deemed to be a "veteran'':
  (a) Any person who at the time of entering into the armed forces of the United States had declared his intention to become a subject or citizen of the United States and withdrew his intention under the provisions of the act of Congress approved July ninth, nineteen hundred and eighteen.
  (b) Any person who was discharged from the said armed forces on his own application or solicitation by reason of his being an enemy alien.
  (c) Any person who has been proved guilty of wilful desertion.
  (d) Any person whose only service in the armed forces of the United States consists of his service as a member of the coast guard auxiliary or as a temporary member of the coast guard reserve, or both.
  (e) Any person whose last discharge or release from the armed forces is dishonorable.
  "Armed forces'' shall include army, navy, marine corps, air force and coast guard.
  "Active service in the armed forces'', as used in this clause shall not include active duty for training in the army national guard or air national guard or active duty for training as a reservist in the armed forces of the United States. 
http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/gl-pt1-toc.htm

22 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.

10/24/06 @ 9:27 pm
capemom [Member] writes:
I know little about the military, but if I spent a total of 6 months in the military, mostly training on bases , and not on active duty, which is hard work at best and life-theatening at worst, I would not count myself among those who served for real. C'mon, Bill! What an insult!
10/25/06 @ 1:49 am
Concerned Veteran [Member] writes:
Listen you all are missing the BIG picture on this. All the candidates in 10th Congressional district suck! They are manipulating ass clowns bred from evil.Delahunt may not be a Veteran because of oversought facts that he himself may not have known. This is fine with me considering all the crapbags I served with who went AWOL and STILL received a medal for the war I served in, in which they didn't even step foot on the same soil I did. Same ball park.
To me the definition of a real Veteran is one who engaged in combat to serve our country.To me a real Veteran is eligible to join a VFW..is either candidate?(no)A real Veteran will support other Veterans and get their hands dirty to help them.A real Veteran concerns themselves with the people and not when the next national news networks are going to have you on their shows as some blah blah blah expert where your are seen by less than 1% of the country who will forget you five seconds after they saw you.Bill Delahunt in my book is a Veteran of fighting for the Veterans who are in the V.A system who are disabled from war.
10/25/06 @ 7:21 am
Dennis [Member] writes:
Now that the lid has been lifted off the Delahunt stinkpot, maybe some enterprising reporter will look into the stange death during his undistinguished career as a DA. Rumors has circulated around Boston for years, but no one nailed nailed him.
10/25/06 @ 7:30 am
Sacreblu [Member] writes:
It is difficult to imagine a less distinguished congressional record than that compiled by "Weak Willy" Delahunt. His only elective function appears to be carrying the twop stools for our ancient US Senator so Fat Ted won't be the only cripple who has to sit down at rallies.
The fact that he's lying about his veteran status is consistent with the rest of this empty suit.
10/25/06 @ 8:19 am
The Yarmouth Taxpayer [Member] writes:
Concerned Veteran. I can understand your anger in your statement. But, Your comment about Mr. Delahunt, Bill Delahunt in my book is a Veteran of fighting for the Veterans who are in the V.A system who are disabled from war. Who are you kidding? I’m a Disable Veteran with a War Time service connected disability and an active member of the DAV. Mr. Delahunt just gives hot air and lip service to us Veterans. When will the Veterans here in this district wake up? Now we see he has been lying about his Veteran status. The Veterans here in the District should be outraged as I am and call for Delahunt to resign.
10/25/06 @ 2:11 pm
Buzz [Member] writes:
Seneca,

Don't leave us hanging. Tell us more. Any place we can get more info on this? I'm chomping at the bit.
10/25/06 @ 11:11 pm
Concerned Veteran [Member] writes:
Point well taken taxpayer, but Im in no way sticking up for Delahunt's idiocracy. If you read my comments I don't like any of the candidadtes. I think they are all special in their own kind of retarded way.If your an active member of the DAV then why are you turning this into a partisan issue? I served with people far worse than Delahunt who are allowed to call themselves Veterans and they never did a single thing for me. I like the V.A programs down here and I utilize them weekly, Im not saying Delahunt is the Soldier of the Year for these programs but us DAV members know which elected officials had there hands in it. If you need me to research that for you and email it to you I will because your obviously miseducated. Thats all I said about Delahunt who personally I cant stand anyway becuase of his Hugo Chavez love affair. What does outrage me though taxpayer is that if somebody went through my DD-214 which is in a lock box and brought it public I would do everything I could to ruin that persons life...no lie. You know as much as I do that the document is not public information.
10/26/06 @ 7:35 am
The Yarmouth Taxpayer [Member] writes:
Concerned Veteran: The VA here on the Cape is insufficient and is not capable of handling the needs of Cape Veterans. The local Chapter of the DAV has plans for a new building; half will be a new clinic, about 10,000sq feet. Mr. Delahunt give lip service when it comes to having the VA mandatory funded instead of the present discretionary funding formula. He hasn’t push for full concurrent compensation. Why do we Retired Veterans have to pay for our own disabilities? I do not need any education on the VA here in Hyannis or Providence. It a simple solution when it comes to Delahunt, Get Rid Of Him.
10/26/06 @ 8:54 am
Democrant [Member] writes:
I'm laughing my butt off watching this gang salivate over yet another non-issue. That strategy has worked out quite well so far.
10/26/06 @ 11:07 am
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
So basically because Bill Delahunt joined the Coast guard is not enough to be called a veteran? That's garbage. At least he joined and served. He took the road less travelled. I was a Marine Reservist, I am a vateran. I served in Iraq, got the purple heart, silver star and distinguished service medal. I am a life member of the VFW. I was called upon and did my duty just like Bill Delahunt would have done if he had been called. Don't hold it against him that his unit was never activated, that was beyond his control. At least he put himself in a position to serve when called unlike most people. Very few people can say who is a veteran is or who isn't. Some stupid law stating 180 days doesn't mean a thing. he joined up when he could have chosen not to. he put himself in a position to serve. That's more then a majority of people on the cape can say.
10/26/06 @ 11:43 am
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
I know, as a veteran, that it takes a lot for a person to join and Delahunt did. So did Jeff Beatty, both of them made a personal choice to put themselves in the line of fire. It isn't Delahunt's fault he was never called upon. Active or reserve, service members are veterans. Reservist risk just as much as anyone on active duty. A lot of the men and women who have made the ultimate sacrifice have been reservists. many killed before they hit 180 dyas of active service. Do you dare say they are not veterans?
10/26/06 @ 11:53 am
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
I challenge anyone on here to say that I am wrong on this. If I did not have 180 days of service I would still call myself a veteran, I don't care what the law says. Bill Delahunt and Jeff Beatty are both veterans. The President of the United States was in the Air National Gaurd, he says he is a veteran but he never served 180 days active either outside of training. This is an issue brought to light by the Beatty campaign. Tell me what a picture of Jeff Beatty on an aircraft carrier has to do with this issue? This is a smear tactic by the Beatty camp. Beatty isn't eligible to be a member of the VFW just like Delahuint isn't. beatty talks about medical student patching his wounds on Grenada but the fact is he got shot down on his way into Grenada and never saw the students. He lies more about his service record then anyone.
10/26/06 @ 11:57 am
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
And the Yankee hat is supposed to be holding his head wounds on that added insult to injury but Beatty is a Yankee fan. He can't fool Red Sox nation, he's been a Yankee fan since his days at Rutgers.
10/26/06 @ 1:14 pm
Concerned Veteran [Member] writes:
Dead on the money ChathamBaseball.They both are ineligible for the VFW. People should look into Beatty's record's to see if he even holds a Combat Infantry Badge which he wheres so proudly on his suit which is utterly freaking disrespectful to anyone who served in the infantry.(he doesn't) Why hasn't anyone asked the question of where is Delahunt's proof that gave him a Veteran status? I mean there has to be some document that gave him Veteran status to begin with to have it on the ballot.Somebody gave that status to him, he didn't just wake up and say oh hey Im going to call myself a Veteran today. This is smear politics by Beatty but it probably would have worked for him if it wasn't two weeks before the election...too little too late.Obviosly its crunch time for him and he is scrambling for something so his ego won't be bruised. Like I said all the candidates in the race are ass clowns but I'll stick with the one we alreay have.
10/26/06 @ 2:15 pm
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
I would think that if Jeff Beatty had an ounce of integrity or character he wouldn't throw this out there to slap Delahunt in the face. If he had any sense of integrity or character he would be grateful for Delahunt's service, in any capacity. And excellent point about who verified Delahunt as a veteran. it's not like Delahunt printed out the ballots himself. Someone involved with the electoral process had to have verified he was a veteran and put it on the ballot.
10/26/06 @ 2:21 pm
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
Why don't we ask Josh Dunn about Mr. Beatty's integrity and character? You're all aware that he fired Josh Dunn and cancelled Josh's final paycheck right? Josh is a vetran of Iraq and served proudly and with distinguished honor. Beatty even bragged about Josh in his speech saluting veterans at Orleans Field. then he turns around and stabs this kid in the back. That's how Beatty treats veterans. I am ashamed of Beatty beyond the belief and though I am grateful for his service, his actions in this election are dispicable and he brings shame to the combat actions badge and the purple heart that he tries and throws in everyone faces. So Jeff, before you slander another candidate, make sure all the skeletons in your closet are out there as well. because I will surely let the world know. This story doesn't hurt Delahunt, it makes us all question your integrity and character. You are a vile, liar with no sense of community. And here on the cape we are all about community. Beatty just doesn't fit here.
10/26/06 @ 2:27 pm
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
And a message to CAPEMOM way up top of the comments: Shame on you lady. You know nothing of service and nothing of the military. Being in the service in any capacity is serving "for real" you dumb cow. If you were to say something like that in my presence I would spit in your face. You said it, "I know little about the military..." Exactly because if you did you would know how disrespectful a comment like that is to anyone who has ever served. Any type of service is "for real". Guys that drill and train one weekend a month, 2 weeks a year, like Delahunt did while serving, are over there right now fighting and DYING for you. So if you know little about something, KEEP YOUR GOD DAMN MOUTH SHUT!!!!
10/26/06 @ 4:10 pm
capemom [Member] writes:
ChathamBaseball: There are anger management classes at the Gosnold Treatment Facility in Falmouth--here's the link:

http://www.addictionresourceguide.com/listings/gosnold.html

You have drawn the wrong conclusion from my statement. I have great respect for military men and women and they all deserve our gratitude for giving their lives and service to preserve our freedom.

This freedom includes your and my right to free speech, so your calling me a dumb cow is fair game, but it does not include your right to spit in my face as you threatened to do.

You are tarnishing the image of the military, or of veterans, or whatever you are representing, with your profane, semi-psychotic rants.
10/26/06 @ 4:32 pm
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
You are tarnishing the image of Americans as a whole lady; by throwing your two cents into a conversation you have no intelligent business speaking to. Say whatever you want but don't insinuate that I need anger management classes or am tarnishing the military's image. It's called being passionate about something that I made a great sacrifice to be a part of. So exercise your right to free speech, but be prepared to hear the rebuttal to your ignorant comments. Speak to people about service when you yourself have served or have a very clear understanding of what the military is all about. When I was in Iraq I got shot in the face lady, in the face. Do you have any idea what that is like? Do you know what it like to have a scar on your face that makes children point at you as you walk down the street? That people make jokes about behind your back? And why did I go through that? For those children and those people that laugh at me. I may have scars but I still have the ability to stand up for what I believe in. If you can't handle it, don't make stupid comments on this blog.
10/27/06 @ 10:41 pm
Concerned Veteran [Member] writes:
Chatam Baseball: I'm pretty sure Josh Dunn resigned from Beatty's campaign because Beatty didn't pay hime the right amount of money to begin with. Word around town and in the newspapers was Beatty was embarrassed with Josh Dunn resigning from the campaign and thats how why Beatty became immature by canncelling his paychecks. I agree whole heartidly with everything you are saying but Josh is pretty popular with a lot of people and he's the type of person who would never have a reason to be fired from anything and he is very active with a lot of Cape Republicans.What Beatty did to him though was disgusting and should never have happened and people who give money to that campaign have contributed to scumbag actions towards a real Cap Cod Veteran.
10/30/06 @ 10:18 am
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
I have no idea if Dunn is bad mouthing Beatty, but wouldn't you bad mouth someone if they tried to steal from your earned livelyhood? Dunn did nothing wrong here, he just wanted to get paid and Beatty knew he was in the wrong and settled out of court because he was more concerned with huis image then anything else.

And this isn't about Beatty being a disabled vet. Does getting shot down in a helicopter all of a sudden qualify someone to represent others in congress? It certainly does not.

delahunt is a good man with a strong reputation here on the cape. Beatty has repeatedly tried to slander this man with no due course.

Beatty is trying to scare people into voting for him with terrorism. His tactics in this campaign have made hima terrorist himself. Scare others into doing what you want. We will not be frieghtened jeff and we will follow the man who has led us so well for the past decade into the future.
10/30/06 @ 1:35 pm
ChathamBaseball [Member] writes:
Someone actually tell me this isn't just a smear tactic orchestrated by Beatty. Why on earth is there a picture (that may or may not be Beatty) on this story pertaining to Delahunt's veterans status. This is a pathetic attempt to win some votes last minute. Beatty is not going to win this election. Bill Delahunt will win and we will be better off for it. We don't need a slanderous, liar in office, I can assure you, that's exactly what Jeff Beatty is.
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Herb's Guitar Suit
Protect your guitar's finish!. The Suit prevents dings, dents, scratches & gouges. Machine washable, engineer designed and made of high-quality microfibre. Protect your investment and order your Suit today! (Falmouth)
Patrissi Landscaping
Cape Cod residential landscaping, landscape construction, irrigation, stonework and outside lighting. (Harwich)
IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COMMENTORS & BLOGGERS: CapeCodToday now requires a one-time validation of your account email. When logging in or registering for the first time, you will be emailed a link to click that will validate your email and complete your login. The link in the email must be clicked in the same session when you are logged into the site for security purposes (i.e. retrieve the email right away and do not close your web browser).

This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.

Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 2,702 registered commenters!

CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!

Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).

Previous/Next posts in this blog

About This Blog

cctodaylogo_150 These stories about Cape Cod and Islands are written by our staff. You are invited to comment on any story. Your opinion will appear on our front page immediately, and it will be archived and available on this site at any time at no charge by using the search element of the top of every page.
Walter Brooks, Editor & Publisher
Maggie Kulbokas, Editor

- site sponsors -


CCT Blog Tools

Login to comment or manage your blog:

Username: 

Password:     

Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!

Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?

If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.

Blog Newsfeed

CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.

Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "Cape & Islands News" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.

RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3