Fair 47.0°F Fair [Forecast] :: Saturday, November 7th, 2009
Vacation Info Wedding Info Kids/Parents NEW! Pets

Cape Cod Murder

“Murder is not the crime of criminals, but that of law-abiding citizens.” - Emmanuel Teney
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Home Care Property Management Services Inc.
Offering professional cleaning services is just part of what we do. We provide home, office, post-construction and rental turnover cleanings. Visit our website for a full range of property management services. (Sandwich)
Meryl's Music and Arts Centers
We offer early childhood music and signing programs for Cape Cod families. Research shows that music education supports all learning! Locations in Sandwich, S. Yarmouth, Harwich, and Orleans. (Harwich)

The mysterious 12:03 a.m. phone call from state police

With jurors in the Worthington trial deadlocked and sequestered on the same day, it would come as no surprise for the case to end in a hung jury, followed by a retrial. And with a retrial, one of the holes in the prosecution's case to be patched is the mysterious phone call to Jeremy Frazier from the Yarmouth state police barracks at 12:03 a.m. on Saturday Jan. 4, 2002.

Defense attorney Robert George made frequent references to the call as part of a broad strategy of raising doubts about the state's case against accused killer Christopher McCowen. Frazier, when he testified, denied receiving any call from state police that night, nor that he had any relationship with police.

But jurors also heard testimony from Shawn Mulvey that he suspected Frazier of setting him up to be charged with selling drugs, as well as testimony from two police officers that McCowen told them Frazier was a drug dealer, a tip conveyed to police more than three years before McCowen was charged in Christa Worthington's murder.

While jurors wrestle with reasonable doubt as they head into a sixth day of deliberations, there's little doubt around Barnstable Superior Court that Frazier and the police had some type of relationship as of January 2002, and the alleged basis for this was illicit drugs.

Seen through this prism, the most plausible explanation for the 12:03 a.m. phone call to Frazier from state police becomes clear -- and it has nothing to do with Worthington's murder.

Recall, for example, the testimony of Tom Bilbo, the young man who hosted the party at his house in Eastham on the night of Friday, Jan. 2, 2002. Bilbo testified that he saw McCowen, Frazier, Mulvey and Chris Bearse arrive at the party sometime between 11 and 11:30 p.m. Shortly thereafter, a fight broke out, one indisputably involving Frazier and Mulvey.

Something else happens shortly thereafter -- the phone call at 12:03 a.m. to Frazier's cell phone from state police. This was established by attorney George obtaining copies of Frazier's phone records and entering them into evidence (George also sought to establish that Frazier tried to call state police 25 times on Jan. 4 and 5, but was less successful on that score).

What is known beyond dispute is that Frazier, drinking heavily that night, was looking for a specific person at the Bilbo party, and became embroiled in a fight soon after arriving between 11 and 11:30 p.m. --  and within an hour, someone at the Yarmouth state police barracks was calling Frazier.

Is it such a stretch that state police were calling Frazier in response to Frazier calling them to implicate the subject of his wrath as a drug dealer, real or imagined?

Recall also, if you will, the scenario outlined by George in his closing argument to the jury -- Worthington stabbed to death between 1 and 3 p.m. on Saturday, Jan. 4, with the killer fleeing in the large dark vehicle that catches the attention of Girard Smith. But if the person seen by Smith was Worthington's killer, the call to Frazier from the state police went out well over 12 hours before Worthington's death.

Just who was calling Frazier, and why, are two questions that a new trial might answer, as well as the identity of the motorist in the large dark vehicle.

14 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.

11/13/06 @ 11:00 pm
Monponsett [Member] writes:
I haven't been following the case much, but I'd trust your judgement if you decided to lay odds on Guilty vs. Innocent.
11/14/06 @ 7:31 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Thanks, capri, appreciate it. In response to your question, Monpo, the two most likely outcomes that I can see are jurors remaining deadlocked and the judge declaring a mistrial, followed by another trial, or scenario two where McCowen is found guilty of voluntary or involuntary manslaughter but not of the rape and burglary charges. Least likely scenarios appear to be for jury to find McCowen guilty of murder one, rape and burglary, or to acquit across the board.

The judge said that is order to sequester was not punitive in response to jurors saying earlier in day that they were deadlocked, but jurors may well have interpreted it as punitive. The sequestration order was not limited to one night, but for as long as necessary to reach a verdict. If three more jurors are dismissed because of family obligations they cannot meet due to sequestration, the jury would number less than a dozen, forcing Nickerson to declare a mistrial. This was the risk defense attorney George took in requesting the jury be sequestered.

I've noticed how difficult it is to get more than two or three people to agree on this case and getting a dozen to agree must be that much more difficult.
11/14/06 @ 9:07 am
Buzz [Member] writes:
Jack,

Interesting report. Tell me, is the blood print, fibers and any other possible DNA evidence preserved?

I guess what I'm asking is the questionable potential evidence that Atty George introduced available in the case of a new trial>
11/14/06 @ 9:11 am
Buzz [Member] writes:
Jack,

If a mistrial is declared, does McCowen go free until the next trial?
11/14/06 @ 10:26 am
wolfram [Member] writes:
Wow, this just got a bit deeper. On Court TV right now, Juror #4 is the girlfriend of Kyle Hicks the man arrested on Sunday in the Falmouth shooting. She is also the mother of his baby. The attorneys are now arguing how this will affect the outcome of McCowen's trial.
11/14/06 @ 10:28 am
wolfram [Member] writes:
Juror #4--dismissed! An alternate will now take over...
11/14/06 @ 10:20 pm
crusader [Member] writes:
And, just maybe if this case was tried off Cape, in Boston, there wouldn't be this "freakshow", going on.....media interference, conflicts with a juror and the arrest of her boyfriend, the judge making mistakes on certain motions, and yes, the fact that possibly they could have found a more intelligent jury off Cape as noted on the Eric Williams blog today by someone other than myself......sorry to say......I told you so......I predict a hung jury or NG....there's got to be more than one who favors the 'not guilty' vote.....trust me, it won't be that easy to get a conviction now.....there is way too much 'reasonable doubt'....

Attorney George has done an outstanding job......wish I could say the same for the prosecution.....I saw Welsh as weak, less informed, less prepared---out mastered and out maneuvered....George was doing a hot Tango to Welsh's ineffective Tennessee Waltz.

I say McCowen walks ......and the next trial will bring the real killer(s) and conspirators to justice....maybe we will even get to see those 10 witnesses take the stand, who have much to hide......
11/14/06 @ 10:34 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Crusader..."I say McCowen walks ......and the next trial will bring the real killer(s) and conspirators to justice....maybe we will even get to see those 10 witnesses take the stand, who have much to hide......"

I hope so and would love to know who the 10 witnesses are. This could get very interesting.
11/14/06 @ 11:04 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
In response to KMA's questions -- I would expect the forensic evidence to be preserved in this case, as with any murder case, but I can't say for certain that happened here.

As to whether McCowen goes free in the event of a mistrial, no, he'd remain in custody as if this trial was never held, according to what I'm hearing around the courthouse. And a second trial could be many months away, if not longer away.

In response to Crusader -- my impression is that the trial it is not nearly the freakshow you allege. There's a huge difference between how it is being shown on TV via Court TV and the reality of the trial day to day at the courthouse. What the judge is doing with here could well set the standard for other jurists in handling high-profile cases with strong emotions on both sides. Could you elaborate on the mistakes you claim Nickerson has made?
11/14/06 @ 11:31 pm
crusader [Member] writes:
Jack,

The mistakes the judge made were based on what I heard from Att. George's responses....in the courtroom on days I attended the trial.. or watched it on Court TV.......his almost going over Nickerson's head....in some instances...based on his unfair decisions...

because I have not been following as closely as you have, Jack, I honestly cannot remember......lets just say that as much as I grew to appreciate & almost like this judge, his behavior with respect to the expert witnesses & his rulings (in favor of the prosecution) seemed to show some bias....that's just my opinion of course......

I remember Att. George's bewilderment with some of the judge's decisions.......and what did it really matter about juror #4 anyway? This case has been so highly publicized, I can't imagine that any one of those jurors could avoid any outside influences. The damage is done. They have to just use their own judgement as best they can, but maybe they just can't do it......I think fear of the cops is an element..

I would like to see this over, once and for all.....enough already......
11/14/06 @ 11:33 pm
crusader [Member] writes:
And Jack,

So many times, I thought I would see Attorney George break into the famous Al Pacino line from "Dog Day Afternoon".......

"No judge....you're out of order.....this entire case is out of order.....everything is out of order".......
11/14/06 @ 11:36 pm
crusader [Member] writes:
Mav,

I know at least 6 or more.....but not going to say.....hopefully Alan D. and some new "dream team" will be on the next round......
11/15/06 @ 12:04 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Crusader, George is not in a position to "go over Nickerson's head," nor is Welsh for that matter; that would be up to an appeals court to decide. And I think you will have a hard time convincing many people on either side of this case that Nickerson is not well-acquainted with the law.

That Pacino flick was "And Justice For All," by the way, not "Dog Day Afternoon."
05/07/07 @ 12:57 pm
babyschon [Member] writes:
hello, I read in crimelibrary about this tragedy I'm so sorry, so sorry for what happened to the small Ava and of course to Christa.

Please, all the articles are not to easy for me to understand.

What are the facts right now?

Thank you very much
Babyschon/Europe
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Emily Michael Too
We believe that everyone should have an opportunity to escape, even just for an hour to gather your thoughts. Our philosophy is that the body and mind are as one. Take a moment to rejuvenate your mind as well as your body. (Dennis)
Community Care Resource Group
An organization of caring professionals who provide a wide range of services to seniors on Cape Cod. Our mission is to connect with one another, collaborate on ideas and provide information and referrals for seniors in our community. (Dennis)
IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COMMENTORS & BLOGGERS: CapeCodToday now requires a one-time validation of your account email. When logging in or registering for the first time, you will be emailed a link to click that will validate your email and complete your login. The link in the email must be clicked in the same session when you are logged into the site for security purposes (i.e. retrieve the email right away and do not close your web browser).

This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.

Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 3,189 registered commenters!

CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!

Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).

Previous/Next posts in this blog

About This Blog

murdercapecodChristopher McCowen is being tried for the brutal murder of fashion writer Christa Worthington. This blog aggregates the news about the trial and offer readers the opportunity to give their opinions.

- site sponsors -


CCT Blog Tools

Login to comment or manage your blog:

Username: 

Password:     

Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!

Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?

If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.

Blog Newsfeed

CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.

Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "Cape Cod Murder" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.

RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3