Fair 44.0°F Fair [Forecast] :: Saturday, November 21st, 2009
Vacation Info Wedding Info Kids/Parents NEW! Pets

Op-Ed

A page where people can oppose the publishers
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Falmouth Academy
Summer Programs at Falmouth Academy for students of all ages and skill levels run through the summer, mostly one week in length. Spend some time this summer exploring the arts, sciences, music, languages, athletics and more. (Falmouth)
Curves of Cape Cod
Curves is a facility specially designed for women featuring a complete 30 minute workout. You can burn over 500 calories in one strength training workout! New 30 Day Diet Plan. Lose weight and keep it off! Five convenient Cape locations.

Dateline Bizarro World (no ZIP code)

That bizarrely spun news release from the Alliance
Stringing out their paychecks for another few months

By Chris Stimpson

Timing is everything, especially when the referee with the stopwatch is trying to rig the game for your team's benefit.  That and other apposite metaphors were on my mind as I observed the sequence of events surrounding the release of the recent DoD report that confirmed that the planned wind turbines would not interfere with the PAVE PAWS radar system.
It would be churlish of me to suggest that a certain politician would have alerted his supporters to the report contents ahead of time

It would be churlish of me to suggest that a certain politician closely involved with wind farm/radar issues (or his aide) would have alerted his supporters to the report contents ahead of its issuance.  Our elected representatives invariably act with such transparency and rectitude that questionable behavior of that sort would be unconscionable.  And yet, that bizarrely spun news release from the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound ("this further confirms that this is just a bad location for this project") seemed to hit the streets within moments of the DoD report being made public.  Even Cape Wind only learned about the report at the same time as the rest of us mere mortals.  Did the Alliance acquire a particularly speedy typewriter?

As a retired military aviator I am well aware that when aviation authorities establish a boundary it already has a significant margin of safety built inAs a retired military aviator I am well aware that when aviation authorities establish a boundary it already has a significant margin of safety built in, whether it's restricted airspace established for air combat training or missile firing, a minimum fuel reserve for flight planning, or an aircraft's final approach speed before touchdown.  When we calculated the minimum safe altitude for a flight we would take the highest object within thirty miles, add 10% for map error, throw in another 1500 feet for altimeter error, then round the whole thing up to the next hundred feet for good luck.  So if we were anywhere near 6288' Mt. Washington, for example, we'd have had to have flown at 8500' just to stay legal, never mind alive.  And traditionally, a ‘buffer' zone is an extra layer of airspace wrapped around restricted airspace to allow for the kind of aviator who checks wind direction by sticking a wet finger out of the cockpit window at 200 mph.  

So when the DoD establishes a ‘buffer' zone of 25 kilometers around PAVE PAWS, it doesn't mean that a turbine hub within smooching distance of the periphery of the zone will allow unreconstructed Soviets to launch ICBMs at us undetected.  And if said turbines are 2.5 kilometers outside the periphery, not to mention 2,600 feet below the main radar beam, they really don't qualify as ‘too close for comfort'.  If Mr. Vinick of the Alliance really feels that, he must have an extraordinarily low comfort threshold.

With all this said, I know that a lot of people were upset about the timing of the Alliance release and the amazing level of expertise on radar issues that it contained (far more advanced, apparently, than that of the Defense Missile Agency experts).  For me, however, that word ‘bizarre' that I used in the second paragraph kept bobbing up like untreated excrement in Nantucket Sound.  Finally, I realized why.
bizarro_200
In Bizarro World  ANYTHING can be spun upside-down

Do you recall the 'Bizarro World' episodes in the Superman comics from many years ago?  This was a world in which everything was upside down, worked backwards, and made no sense.  Black was white, good was bad, hard work was frowned upon and laziness was rewarded.  A nice place to visit, but you wouldn't want to live there.  And it occurred to me that, since the Alliance had interpreted a report that categorically absolved the wind farm from threatening PAVE PAWS as having done exactly the opposite, the Alliance has finally relocated to Bizarro World, a place where anything - ANYTHING - can be spun upside-down.

And that's fine with me, because now it's clear that they're just going through the motions, stringing out their paychecks for another few months.  They have never had a moral basis for their existence, and now the world knows they have no intellectual foundation either.  

Perhaps, Cliff, since you lost this one, I can help you with your next thrust.  How about suggesting that turbines cause cancer in rats?  Or that they'll interfere with space shuttles making emergency landings?  Perhaps you can come up with something that gives us even more amusement than this one did, but I really doubt it.  

 

9 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.

06/23/07 @ 9:48 am
Solon [Member] writes:
Chris,

You will be sorely missed. You are truly a voice of reason on a subject where the biggest spin does not emanate from the turbines.

The opponents of the wind farm are not only grasping at last straws right now, but they're grasping for their last paychecks.

The paymasters of the Alliance will soon realize they've only succeeded in making themselves look like fools. I've been getting comments from as far away as the West Coast and from Germany asking what's wrong with the anti-wind farm folks on Cape Cod?

It appears they have spent millions preaching to an increasingly smaller choir while the rest of the world laughs.
06/24/07 @ 7:17 pm
barbaradurkin [Member] writes:
“Radar interference is no longer a theory, but a demonstrated threat confirmed by DOD that Cape Wind must acknowledge. It is now time for Cape Wind to find a more suitable site for this project.”

Thank you, Cliff, for your excellent work!

Flemming Nissen head of development at West Danish generation company ELSAM (one of Denmark’s largest energy utilities):

“Increased development of wind turbines does not reduce Danish CO2 emissions”

Neils Gram of the Danish Federation of Industries:

“In green terms windmills are a mistake and economically they make no sense…”

Jytte Kaad Jensen, chief economist for Eltra, Denmark’s biggest electricity distributor:

“In just a few years we’ve gone from some to the cheapest electricity in Europe to some of the most costly.”

Aase Madsen, an MP who chairs energy policy in the Danish Parliament, is emphatic:

“For our industry it has been a terribly expensive disaster.”
06/25/07 @ 10:28 am
Solon [Member] writes:
Barbara, Barbara, Barbara,

Just look at your negative quotes! They all come (if they are real at all) from representatives (or their lackeys) of the fossil fuel industry. Just like with your buddies here on Cape Cod!

I've been to Denmark, Barbara, have you? I've talked to reps from the electrical generation industry, had dinner with officials from local and national government and from the national tourist bureau, and have not seen or heard of ONE of the people you've "quoted" nor of their "opinions." (They must certainly be very important and respected in Denmark.)

Go to Denmark, Barbara, investigate for yourself. Don't allow yourself to be deluded any longer. In the meanwhile, to borrow a term from O'Reilly, lay off the Kool-Aid.
06/25/07 @ 3:53 pm
barbaradurkin [Member] writes:
Cape Wind Kool-Aid antidotes:

Henning Rasmussen, Danish engineer:

“When the wind arrives on or two hours later than forecast, we get nothing and we have to ask our neighbors to rescue us.”

Gundolf Dany, chief engineer at Aachen:

“Until we invent a way of storing huge amounts of electricity, wind energy can never be relevant to our future.”

Sir Martin Holdgate, former chairman of the British Renewable Energy Advisory Group:

“The trouble with wind farms is that they have a huge spatial footprint for a piddling little bit of electricity..."

Richard Courtney:

Reviewer for the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

“Wind farms are "environmentally damaging money wasters whose large scale use increases power demand. The New Age dream of a world operated by wind farms will remain a dream because the laws of physics do not allow it in an industrialized world. If wind power were economic then oil tankers would be sailing ships."
06/25/07 @ 9:51 pm
neil good [Member] writes:
Solon, you say above, “I've talked to reps from the electrical generation industry…”

Maybe you should have talked less and listened more while you were in Denmark Solon. The Copenhagen Post ran this story on the first day of January.

“ENERGY GIANTS SAY WIND POWER IS HOT AIR”

“The country's energy companies are not convinced that wind power is the way of the future. Management at Denmark's energy companies, DONG Energy and Vattenfall, do not subscribe to the current mindset that wind energy will be especially prominent in the future, reported national public broadcaster DR. The companies believe that coal-powered electricity will still be the largest supplier of the nation's energy, despite the trend toward environmentally friendly sources. 'Wind energy can't solve the energy problem in the near future because it's too unstable and possibly too expensive,' said Anders Eldrup, chief executive of Dong Energy [Denmark’s largest energy company].
06/26/07 @ 7:25 am
barbaradurkin [Member] writes:
Professor David Bellamy:

"Huge amounts of tax payers money for scant environmental and electrical benefit make them a scam. Wind-farms are inefficient, destroy the landscape and far more could be achieved through energy efficiency. If you lagged the roofs of 500 homes it would have the effect of putting up one turbine. They can only work 30% of the time at very best, in Denmark it is only 17%. We have to keep other stations running, spinning in reserve, inefficiently pouring out carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide. These turbines are 22 storeys high put on hills where everyone can see them. They kill bats and birds and need 1,000 tonnes of concrete as well as a road infrastructure. It beggars belief that some environmental groups can say they are 'green'."
06/26/07 @ 7:58 am
bittersweet [Member] writes:
Can we talk to some normal, every-day Demnarkians and see what they think?
06/26/07 @ 8:30 am
neil good [Member] writes:
“Danes Go Cold on Wind Farms”

Nov. 1 2006

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1613772006

“The nation that leads the world in wind-farm development is going cool on the environmentally friendly source of power. Since the boom year of 2000, when as many as 748 turbines were erected, the number being built in Denmark has steadily fallen. So far this year, only six new wind turbines have been put up. While many countries around the world are clamouring to buy Danish wind turbines, Denmark’s government is finding it difficult to convince its own population to accept an increase in the domestic use of the green technology. Describing turbines as “poorly located, noisy and unsightly”, a number of local authorities, backed by grass-roots campaigners, are rejecting plans for new wind farms.“
06/27/07 @ 9:09 am
barbaradurkin [Member] writes:
"In other words, in spite of wind turbines producing a quantity of power equivalent to more than 20 per cent of its domestic consumption, very little of this power is actually consumed in west Denmark. I have calculated that in 2003, more than 80 per cent of wind output was exported, leaving west Denmark to consume about 4 per cent of its power from its enormous capacity of wind turbines.
There is an added irony here. The Danish consumer pays the highest tariffs for electricity in Europe. Much of these are hypothecated for the support of windmill owners. However, the wind power is sold on the spot market at rates that are much lower.
Thus there is a direct transfer of wealth from Danish consumers to consumers in Sweden, Norway and Germany, every time 1kWh of electricity is sold in this way. During 2003, this net transfer of wealth amounted to more than £100m – or £40 per inhabitant."
Hugh Sharman
DK-9370 Hals
Denmark
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Agro Dolce
Specializing in serving authentic regional Italian food featuring fresh ingredients and innovative presentation. The vibrant, casual, yet upscale atmosphere make it perfect for dining with family, friends, or perhaps a bit more romantic... Mangia! (Brewster)
McCarthy Design Studio
Laurie McCarthy creates custom portraits, capturing your pets personality for a lifetime of memories. Gift Certificates are the perfect present for any pet owner! (Barnstable)
IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COMMENTORS & BLOGGERS: CapeCodToday now requires a one-time validation of your account email. When logging in or registering for the first time, you will be emailed a link to click that will validate your email and complete your login. The link in the email must be clicked in the same session when you are logged into the site for security purposes (i.e. retrieve the email right away and do not close your web browser).

This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.

Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 3,356 registered commenters!

CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!

Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).

Previous/Next posts in this blog

About This Blog

oped3An op-ed is a piece of writing, expressing an opinion. The name originated from the tradition of newspapers placing each columns on the page opposite to the editorial page. Thus the term "op-ed" is simply a combination of "opposite" and "editorial." The difference with this one, however, is that you can reply immediately by commenting below.
Walter Brooks, Editor & Publisher
Maggie Kulbokas, Editor

- site sponsors -


CCT Blog Tools

Login to comment or manage your blog:

Username: 

Password:     

Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!

Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?

If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.

Blog Newsfeed

CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.

Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "Op-Ed" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.

RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3