47.0°F Fair [Forecast]
:: Saturday, November 7th, 2009Samizdat
Samizdat ; "I myself create it, edit it, censor it, publish it, distribute it, and [may] get imprisoned for it." - Vladimir BukovskyPlease visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Health Plan Solutions
The new health care reform act affects EVERYONE who lives in MA. If you are an individual or a company, our job is to make sure that you comply with the law. Do you or your employees qualify for Commonwealth Care, or a Choice plans. Give us a call! (Barnstable)
The new health care reform act affects EVERYONE who lives in MA. If you are an individual or a company, our job is to make sure that you comply with the law. Do you or your employees qualify for Commonwealth Care, or a Choice plans. Give us a call! (Barnstable)
Viking Princess Nature Cruises
Sunset cruises, harbor sightseeing tours, special events, pirate fun and critter cruises, sailing daily from MacMillan Wharf, Provincetown. Make a memory! (Provincetown)
Sunset cruises, harbor sightseeing tours, special events, pirate fun and critter cruises, sailing daily from MacMillan Wharf, Provincetown. Make a memory! (Provincetown)
A Ghost Story
08/06/07 · 5:00 pm :: posted by Jeff
When The Other Man is District Attorney
By Jeff Blanchard
Cape and Islands District Attorney Michael O'Keefe has some explaining to do. And the sooner, the better.
There are persistent rumors of a private, personal relationship between DA O'Keefe and Dr. GryboskiIf not to you and me, he should at least tell the court, including his assistant district attorneys, about his history with Ann Gryboski, who is out on bail for allegedly killing her husband on Easter Sunday. Gryboski, a medical doctor until she relinquished her license in the wake of the murder, confessed to shooting her husband of 30 years, Patrick Lancaster, killing him with two bullets from a handgun. Her future is now in the hands of a Cape and Islands grand jury.
That's the rub. It should not be enough that there are persistent rumors of a private, personal relationship between O'Keefe and Gryboski, no matter the legal Lothario's reputation as enhanced by Maria Flook, author of Invisible Eden, a Story of Love and Murder on Cape Cod, about the Christa Worthington murder, including a passage in which O'Keefe drip-dries after an outdoor shower at his home.
It should not be enough that he is single since his divorce from one-time colleague and now judge Joan E. Lynch.
What is troubling to many observers, including several reporters who won't touch the story out of fear of the powerful DA, several Gryboski neighbors, and several others who know one or the other and wonder why the relationship has not been exposed, is that apparently it has not been worth exploring the fact that O'Keefe and Gryboski were neighbors for 10 years -- walking distance neighbors in a subdivision off Route 6A in Barnstable.
Further troubling to these people are the implications of such a cover-up.
If the DA doesn't have to pass the case to another jurisdiction, then he automatically complicates the application of justice just by staying mum on the subject until the subject is no longer relevant.
Gryboski and O'Keefe lived about 10 homes apartThe undeniable fact is that for several years, from 1994 when Ann Gryboski and Patrick Lancaster moved into their home on the corner of Braggs and Coach, until 2004 when O'Keefe sold his home on Palomino and moved to the Ridge Club in Sandwich, Gryboski and O'Keefe lived about 10 homes apart.
As his house was on a dead end street and hers is on a corner at the beginning of the road, O'Keefe at a minimum had to drive past her house in and out for about 10 years.
I asked him about this in a telephone interview on Friday.
In light of his comment to reporters who attended a post-murder press conference -- "There are some mitigating factors surrounding this event...[T]here was a dispute, obviously, between a husband and wife. It ended tragically as sometimes occurs." -- I asked whether he would expand on what he meant by mitigating circumstances.
He said, "Until the grand jury has completed its investigation, we will have no further comment."
In light of the fact that I am told O'Keefe had a pre-existing relationship with Gryboski, I asked, Did you know her beforehand?
And he said, "When the grand jury has completed its work, we'll have further comment, but not until that investigation has been completed."
Click.
Ordinarily, of course, that would be expected, as grand jury investigations are conducted in secret. But since it is O'Keefe's grand jury, the question should have been answered to the public's complete satisfaction before the grand jury makes another move, or how much credibility can the public put into the investigation?
If O'Keefe did not know Ann Gryboski, his longtime neighbor, then he should say so now and put the rumors to rest [see Hyannis News: "Did she have a lover?"]
If O'Keefe did have a pre-existing relationship with Dr. Gryboski, a relationship of any kind, then he should not be in charge of the grand jury empaneled to investigate the grisly murderOn the other hand, if O'Keefe did have a pre-existing relationship with Dr. Gryboski, a relationship of any kind, then he should not be in charge of the grand jury empaneled to investigate the grisly murder, in which Lancaster died from bullet wounds to his side and torso -- some say while lunging toward a battered woman who was acting in self-defense and in defense of her 20-something son, they being the only three in the house at noontime on Easter; and some say while he was in no position to pose a deadly threat in his condition, recovering from a hip operation or some such, armed perhaps with a walker.
Among the fascinating tidbits to emerge from the post-slaughter media onslaught was the handgun found near the dead man's body...as if...as if, what? He had a gun and was pointing it at them...Is that what that suggested? Or, did the good doctor drop it there while she tended to the batterer-spouse-victim-patient?
Everyone who wrote about it for the papers from Cape Cod to Boston translated those "mitigating factors" to mean Lancaster had beaten Gryboski; for evidence all one had to do was see the bruises all over her face.
Gryboski's defense became self-defense, and her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, echoed O'Keefe in suggesting that there was more to the shooting than meets the public eye.
Further troubling is the very notion that a district attorney can maintain his silence on a question as basic as: Did you know the woman who shot her husband?At this moment in time in the course of criminal justice in the commonwealth -- given the state of the medical examiner's office, rudderless and adrift, and the state of the state's crime lab, rudderless and adrift -- what the public does not need is another challenge to its confidence in the integrity of a criminal investigation, especially murder.
Further troubling is the very notion that a district attorney can maintain his silence on a question as basic as: Did you know the woman who shot her husband?
Michael O'Keefe would only reiterate that the matter is pending before his grand jury.
Meanwhile, it will be interesting to see how this case effects his chances for higher office. For several months, since Michael Sullivan was tapped to head the ATF (Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) O'Keefe's name has been near the top of the short list to become United States Attorney in Boston, as a Republican politician with a job and a strong working relationship with the Kennedys.
Who knows, though, maybe this helps his chances.
119 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.
08/06/07 @ 5:38 pm
bittersweet [Member] writes:
WOW!! This is troubling to say the least!! You know, I had someone say to me once, "How is it that a woman who admits to murder gets out on short bail, but a man who says he is innocent gets a 750 million dollar bail?" (Christopher McCowen) Now it makes more sense. And yet again, further enrages me with the implications...she's a possible "friend" of the DA, so she gets special treatment, while Christopher McCowen is black, poor, "worthless", so he gets the book thrown at him? And while we are on the subject of corruption, let's not forget the $10,000. that is un-accounted for in Truro, spent by the Truro PD. Thank you so much for writing this story, and CC today for posting it. we are ALL in trouble if we have a justice system that doesn't play fair!
[ Show all comments by this user ]
Buzz [Member] writes:
Christopher McCowen had a history of violence against women. Dr Gryboski had a history (did you see the pictures of her face?) of being the abused wife.
Is it really necessary that you make this a "race" issue?
Is it really necessary that you make this a "race" issue?
bittersweet [Member] writes:
It's a fairness issue! All people are to be treated equal! if she admitted to murder, should she not get 750 million bail as the other accused murderer? or how about since he pleaded innocent, he gets the same bail as her?
Do not put your personal opinions into this.....you have a case of two people accused of murder. One gets a light bail,although she admits to the killing. the other says he didn't do it, and yet gets slapped with 750 million bail.
Do not put your personal opinions into this.....you have a case of two people accused of murder. One gets a light bail,although she admits to the killing. the other says he didn't do it, and yet gets slapped with 750 million bail.
Buzz [Member] writes:
My personal opinion....huh?
The Judge has every right in all cases to determin bail. He/she decides based on the severity of the crime (McCowen was accused of a brutal murder and rape and had a history of domestic violence with restraining orders) the doctor on the other hand showed signs of being physically abused and was protecting her children.
Now tell me, why can't you see the difference? Do you think that the Dr is a threat to society?
The Judge has every right in all cases to determin bail. He/she decides based on the severity of the crime (McCowen was accused of a brutal murder and rape and had a history of domestic violence with restraining orders) the doctor on the other hand showed signs of being physically abused and was protecting her children.
Now tell me, why can't you see the difference? Do you think that the Dr is a threat to society?
bittersweet [Member] writes:
The restraining orders never mentioned physical violence from what I read. And isn't it strange to you that it never BECAME rape until they arrested him? Nor was it burglary until they arrested him. All of a sudden, they change the crime? Why would that be? Throw the book at him.
And the only person the Dr. was a threat to is gone. And if you read the posts on her article, you will see that I defended her totally. Self-defense is a right in this country....but so is innocent until proven guilty. And that bail said guilty, guilty, guilty. She admits to murder, and is let go. Fair?
And the only person the Dr. was a threat to is gone. And if you read the posts on her article, you will see that I defended her totally. Self-defense is a right in this country....but so is innocent until proven guilty. And that bail said guilty, guilty, guilty. She admits to murder, and is let go. Fair?
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Wow! What does it take to deal wih Humpty Dumpty DA? Is it front page news of his spending habits? (Which incidently when checked on shows a lot more than the paper reported)I know he is he Cape & Islands DA bu does this include spending campaign funds to the tune of $1000.00 in Kiihei HI? Check i out, Tommy Bahama Cafe,$230.00 for dinner with supporters 02/07/05, Wailea Golf Club
crusader [Member] writes:
Well, well, I wonder how everyone on fantasy island thinks about their wonderful DA now? Guess it's time to wake up from escapism--the intoxication of sunshine and saltwater. This is only the beginning---more heads to roll I'm sure. I wonder what Chief Thomas has got to say about the Truro police budget this evening at the Selectmen's meeting and if the selectwoman was able to provide some much needed counseling for the dear old chief. Those words said by my friend the lawyer who wanted Kevin Callahan to beat MO in 2002 --are burning in my ears today, "that guy is bad news, he and his buddies put innocents away in jail and get their good friends off." Looks like the buses are all lining up for all the bodies to be thrown under. I hate to say, "I told ya' so, Cape Cod", live & learn.
Jeff, I applaud you for your courage in writing this story. Be sure to duck when the sh*tstorm comes your way. Trust me, I've been there, it will arrive. Maybe you could sneak into the Truro Town Hall meeting tonight for a story?
Jeff, I applaud you for your courage in writing this story. Be sure to duck when the sh*tstorm comes your way. Trust me, I've been there, it will arrive. Maybe you could sneak into the Truro Town Hall meeting tonight for a story?
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
I agree crusader, hats off to Mr. Blanchard for his courage. Maybe now its time for the DA's invetigators to take a long hard look at the boss, or maybe its time for Mr. O'keefe to consider his future. How does that work? A grand jury investigation run by a party to the investigation? Huh! Martha "C" where you be?
crusader [Member] writes:
capewatchdog:
Maybe the political tides are finally changing and it's about time. I remember
some attorney's who were trying to get KC elected in 2002, hoping that MO didn't get elected. I didn't understand why until I spent 5 years living on the Cape and seeing for myself how this "ole boy network", more like rogues and punks work their deals in the back rooms.
I wonder how David Mugar, (owner of Star Market-Shaws chains, Cape Cod Mall, etc.) is feeling about a man he has been backing with campaign finance--not too good I'm sure.
Maybe the political tides are finally changing and it's about time. I remember
some attorney's who were trying to get KC elected in 2002, hoping that MO didn't get elected. I didn't understand why until I spent 5 years living on the Cape and seeing for myself how this "ole boy network", more like rogues and punks work their deals in the back rooms.
I wonder how David Mugar, (owner of Star Market-Shaws chains, Cape Cod Mall, etc.) is feeling about a man he has been backing with campaign finance--not too good I'm sure.
crusader [Member] writes:
I'm also wondering if this is true, did the DA use Ann G. for his political gains--or damage control. Her ties to Boston, guys like MO seem to use anyone they can to their advantage.
Shecky [Member] writes:
This rumor has been around every newsroom on Cape Cod for 3 months, and it took Blanchard to write about it. Even Hyannis News.com did a lengthy piece on it, and still the old media was afraid to ask the DA.
Chuck [Member] writes:
A simple answer to the question "Did you know the woman who shot her husband?" would have ended Blanchard's interview and the story probably wouldn't have been written.
Why didn't O'Keefe answer?
Why didn't O'Keefe answer?
Solon [Member] writes:
All this is just rumor and innuendo.
It's the kind of thing that's great for reading in the grocery line when you're waiting for some one to do a pricecheck on the 12,000 items belonging to the customer in front of you.
But is it fact? Or more to the point, is this journalism?
It's the kind of thing that's great for reading in the grocery line when you're waiting for some one to do a pricecheck on the 12,000 items belonging to the customer in front of you.
But is it fact? Or more to the point, is this journalism?
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
C'mon, Solon, O'Keefe is clearly guilty of being the former neighbor of a future murder victim.
Ted from Hyannis Port [Member] writes:
I wouldn't touch that one with a five foot pole, and neither would Dr. Gryboski.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Correction - make that O'Keefe guilty of being former neighbor of future murder suspect and alleged victim of murder.
CCToday [Member] writes:
Fellas and Girls, the journalist you are dissing was trained by Jimmy Breslin at New York Daily News, segued to The Cape Codder where he rose to Managing Editor during that newspaper's glory days and is a frequent paid columnist today in Rhode Island's largest daily the Providence Journal.
Jeff [Member] writes:
Just spell my name right.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Hey Jeff, what's this rumor I hear that you were in the house on the day of the shooting?
crusader [Member] writes:
Yeah, well revolving doors in the newsrooms at the Cape Cod newspapers. Seems to me you've got the good reporters who end up quitting because they aren't allowed to write the facts--then you've got the one's who just listen and nod at the editor's demands. I came across a post on a different site regarding the CW case and person in the know of town politics said, "well this reporter tried to do a story, and Chief Thomas immediately got on the phone to the editor to complain, and the story was then pulled."
There ya' go. Journalists are being censored--are we surprised?
Think about the circles of friends each kept, and how one of the best MD's can influence a politicians career--both ingrained into the fabric of community on Cape Cod. Doctors, lawyers , politicians....they all make things happen. Dr. G's dad was once a prominent doctor in Boston area, just as she was in Cambridge and later on Cape Cod. 3-4 thousand patients is nothing to sneeze at! I bet they feel her loss at the hospital.
"hey baby, can you help me out with this......"
There ya' go. Journalists are being censored--are we surprised?
Think about the circles of friends each kept, and how one of the best MD's can influence a politicians career--both ingrained into the fabric of community on Cape Cod. Doctors, lawyers , politicians....they all make things happen. Dr. G's dad was once a prominent doctor in Boston area, just as she was in Cambridge and later on Cape Cod. 3-4 thousand patients is nothing to sneeze at! I bet they feel her loss at the hospital.
"hey baby, can you help me out with this......"
crusader [Member] writes:
Have we forgotten how disgraceful it was for the DA to admit he made those statements about CW who was brutally murdered: "she was an equal opportunity player, would be with the butcher, baker, go after best friends husbands.......a real pig"......how dare he make those remarks about a victim he was suppose to be investigating her murder! This man is unprofessional and has no respect for women, that is clear by his actions and words. I guess once a rogue cop---always a rogue cop, DA or not a leopard doesn't change his spots. And I'm just wondering where he got all his information from? People throwing stones again and what about all the stones MF throws around? What a piece of work, the two of them. When I worked in that area, I thought someone had dropped me into the twighlight zone. I thought, "what kind of people are they, anyway?" What is this highschool antics?
Did this information make it's way through the LE grapevine or was it that writer, MF feeding it to him so she can protect her friends on Outer Cape?
___________________
I hope whoever is backing MO's campaign is going to re-examine their reasons for contributing dollars to someone who clearly should not be in office. I don't care how many years he's got in LE or as a prosecutor---he's lacking the credentials suited for this distinguished position of power and influence. There is a woman dead and an innocent man locked away because a DA wanted to further his career.
I wonder if he was the one, "CW was seeing a policitian who was very much married, just before her murder."......maybe she told him to hit the road......maybe it was someone with a second home on Cape Cod? There is more to the story. Disparaging a dead woman---sounds like the DA may have got rejected.
Did this information make it's way through the LE grapevine or was it that writer, MF feeding it to him so she can protect her friends on Outer Cape?
___________________
I hope whoever is backing MO's campaign is going to re-examine their reasons for contributing dollars to someone who clearly should not be in office. I don't care how many years he's got in LE or as a prosecutor---he's lacking the credentials suited for this distinguished position of power and influence. There is a woman dead and an innocent man locked away because a DA wanted to further his career.
I wonder if he was the one, "CW was seeing a policitian who was very much married, just before her murder."......maybe she told him to hit the road......maybe it was someone with a second home on Cape Cod? There is more to the story. Disparaging a dead woman---sounds like the DA may have got rejected.
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
When is the next press conference starring Humpty Dumpty O'Keefe? The edge of the wall must be getting shakey! All the kings horses and men are rallying round....I can only wonder what spin is going to be put on this one! Keep those campaign contributions coming for the unapposed DA! He may need it for more than dinners and golf with supporters. One can only hope. So what is King O'Keefes history with Dr. Ann ? More to follow........for sure.
crusader [Member] writes:
I can't help feel compassion and sympathy for Ann G.--first an abusive husband, now possibly the philandering DA in her life? Well, maybe there was a reason they became friends. We don't know the whole story and who is going to tell it? Won't be those candy-ass Cape reporters, we know that's for sure.
Gotta run, gonna be late for the chief's explanation at Truro Town Hall. I hope someone from this site can make the meeting, too. I wonder if he will show, and if he does, what he's got to say.
Maybe he and MO can be a tag team and show up together--each explaining their own stories. Seems like the dominos may be starting to drop....click,click,click
Gotta run, gonna be late for the chief's explanation at Truro Town Hall. I hope someone from this site can make the meeting, too. I wonder if he will show, and if he does, what he's got to say.
Maybe he and MO can be a tag team and show up together--each explaining their own stories. Seems like the dominos may be starting to drop....click,click,click
Buzz [Member] writes:
Hey Crusader,
It sounds like the DA and you have a lot in common. Both have compassion for the murderer. Funny how life takes interesting turns along the way.
It sounds like the DA and you have a lot in common. Both have compassion for the murderer. Funny how life takes interesting turns along the way.
i'm not anonymous [Member] writes:
I couldn't really make it all the way through this "story". Can someone tell me, are there any actual "facts" in the story? My impression is that this is a rumor and some guessing. Can someone please tell me I'm wrong? I hate to be a stickler, but please limit your response to actual facts, not innuendo. I like stories that give me who what where when. This gives me who and then a lot of guesses as far as I can tell.
crusader [Member] writes:
Well, if you didn't have so many journalists on Cape Cod lacking backbone--maybe you could find out whether this is true or not. I doubt JB is going to throw this story out there if it were false. What does he have to gain--plenty to lose, credibility for one thing. If O'Keefe declines to comment, it's an admission of guilt as many see it.
Didn't you know O'Keefe has his own "Iron Curtain"--nobody in and nobody out. Take no prisoners....except innocent black trash men, and some other patsy's so their friends avoid prosecution. Just check your court logs.
Buzz, don't put me in the same category with that %$%@#$@^%$#!^@#$ who calls himself a DA.
HELLO MARTHA, ANYBODY HOME AT THE AG's OFFICE? It seems you may have a little problem regarding the mess on the Cape. Maybe you should send someone else to go after those who stole millions from us off the Big Dig.
I'm not hearing anyone telling me this DA is such a great guy anymore. Suddenly no one's talking when they use to have so much to say.
Didn't you know O'Keefe has his own "Iron Curtain"--nobody in and nobody out. Take no prisoners....except innocent black trash men, and some other patsy's so their friends avoid prosecution. Just check your court logs.
Buzz, don't put me in the same category with that %$%@#$@^%$#!^@#$ who calls himself a DA.
HELLO MARTHA, ANYBODY HOME AT THE AG's OFFICE? It seems you may have a little problem regarding the mess on the Cape. Maybe you should send someone else to go after those who stole millions from us off the Big Dig.
I'm not hearing anyone telling me this DA is such a great guy anymore. Suddenly no one's talking when they use to have so much to say.
crusader [Member] writes:
A good friend of mine use to get unexpected visitors when he was campaigning for MO's opponent, cars would show up at his house late at night--as a form of harassment. Strange, I hear that from other's who have been involved in the CM case, along with some other subtle but very real forms of harassment.
And KC's campaign signs would be ripped up and thrown all around the roads during the election period. Sounds like a nice bunch of rogues to me. Any chance he's also taking campaign dollars from some people in low places as well as high? I don't know, starting to smell like low tide again.
Maybe the CC journalists should stick to stories about dancing fiddler crabs and seaweed. Afterall, anyone brave enough to write about this guy may jus need a couple of body guards to go up against this crowd. And that reminds me, how come that writer, MF got away with it? Well, now there's another story worth pursuing. Maybe he didn't mind being portrayed as the towel man afterall.
And KC's campaign signs would be ripped up and thrown all around the roads during the election period. Sounds like a nice bunch of rogues to me. Any chance he's also taking campaign dollars from some people in low places as well as high? I don't know, starting to smell like low tide again.
Maybe the CC journalists should stick to stories about dancing fiddler crabs and seaweed. Afterall, anyone brave enough to write about this guy may jus need a couple of body guards to go up against this crowd. And that reminds me, how come that writer, MF got away with it? Well, now there's another story worth pursuing. Maybe he didn't mind being portrayed as the towel man afterall.
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
Crusader gives honest, self-respecting nuts and loonies a bad name. Who is this "good friend" who was harassed by mysterious late-nite drive-by's? Was thgere a police report? License numbers? A log of days, dates and times? Did the car have O'Keefe stickers on it? And why do you persist in your professional judgement that an innocent man was convicted in the Worthington case? The convicted man's dna was found on the body and he admitted to "putting the boots to her." Nice guy!
He may not have been alone...but he says he saw murder committed, offered the police an identification of the man he claims actually was the murder...and still you know he is innocent...innocent of what? How do you know this? Was every piece of evidence false? Every word of testimony false? What have you been smoking? I know, I know...you lived with Myles Standish (or was it King Phillip?) and Al Capone was your godfather and next door neighbor...but really...when you visit earth next have your oil checked. I think you'll find you are down at least a quart.
He may not have been alone...but he says he saw murder committed, offered the police an identification of the man he claims actually was the murder...and still you know he is innocent...innocent of what? How do you know this? Was every piece of evidence false? Every word of testimony false? What have you been smoking? I know, I know...you lived with Myles Standish (or was it King Phillip?) and Al Capone was your godfather and next door neighbor...but really...when you visit earth next have your oil checked. I think you'll find you are down at least a quart.
bittersweet [Member] writes:
Buzz, you have just one thing wrong.....she admitted to the murder, while he has all along proclaimed his innocence. Funny, that he's in prison, while she's a free woman. Of course, you don't see the wrongness and the hypocracy of it, but that's because, in my opinion, you had your mind made up all along. Before the trial even started. Innocent until proven guilty and proof beyond a reasonable doubt are supposed to be the standards of our justice system. And in my eyes they didn't even come close. But, now you say,"yeah, she killed him, but she had a good reason." Doesn't hurt if she has the DA for a friend though, does it? So, let me ask you...where's the justice? And btw, like someone said, the DA could have cleared this up immediately. It's only rumour and innuendo because he won't say. I have to qoute The Joker here, because it's so damn appropriate: "This town needs an enema!"
bittersweet [Member] writes:
Peter-
Everything that was supposedly said by Christopher McCowen came from the mouth of State Trooper Mason. Who did not record the interview. Who wrote it down 8 days later. Who was actively helping Welsh to secure his judgeship(we can assume this because he testified on his behalf in front of the panel). It was also Mason who somehow secured a cell phone call from an inmate in lock-up (HUH???) which resulted in juror #4 being thrown off the jury. And we know what happened next. As far as I'm concerned, nothing he said can be taken as truthful testimony....and apparently the jurors felt the same way! As they stated on Dateline. They said they convicted on the dna....but Christopher Mccowen said he had consensual sex with her. There was no other evidence, except the myriad of items they didn't bother to test;semen found on the outside of her leg, blue and white fibers in her genital area, a long 10-12 inch strand of hair, 3 separate dna samples under her nails, a footprint, a palm print...what the fuzz!!! No reasonable doubt? On what planet?
Everything that was supposedly said by Christopher McCowen came from the mouth of State Trooper Mason. Who did not record the interview. Who wrote it down 8 days later. Who was actively helping Welsh to secure his judgeship(we can assume this because he testified on his behalf in front of the panel). It was also Mason who somehow secured a cell phone call from an inmate in lock-up (HUH???) which resulted in juror #4 being thrown off the jury. And we know what happened next. As far as I'm concerned, nothing he said can be taken as truthful testimony....and apparently the jurors felt the same way! As they stated on Dateline. They said they convicted on the dna....but Christopher Mccowen said he had consensual sex with her. There was no other evidence, except the myriad of items they didn't bother to test;semen found on the outside of her leg, blue and white fibers in her genital area, a long 10-12 inch strand of hair, 3 separate dna samples under her nails, a footprint, a palm print...what the fuzz!!! No reasonable doubt? On what planet?
Buzz [Member] writes:
From the CC Times:
''I was not surprised to see that a bail was set as opposed to having her held without bail,” said David Frank, a reporter at Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. ''As a former prosecutor and as someone who has seen my share of bail arguments, this certainly doesn't appear to be outside the realm of what's reasonable.”
In Gryboski's case, the fact that she had no prior criminal record and had strong ties to the community were factors that worked in favor of her receiving bail. She had a thriving medical practice with 2,000 patients at Yarmouth Internists, a home in Barnstable Village that she and her husband owned since 1994, and two adult sons and a grandchild.
''I was not surprised to see that a bail was set as opposed to having her held without bail,” said David Frank, a reporter at Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. ''As a former prosecutor and as someone who has seen my share of bail arguments, this certainly doesn't appear to be outside the realm of what's reasonable.”
In Gryboski's case, the fact that she had no prior criminal record and had strong ties to the community were factors that worked in favor of her receiving bail. She had a thriving medical practice with 2,000 patients at Yarmouth Internists, a home in Barnstable Village that she and her husband owned since 1994, and two adult sons and a grandchild.
crusader [Member] writes:
Peter? Are you Peter Porky? With those nasty quills you use as darts? My, my so much angst. I'm not the crazy one--take a good look around, you may not be surprised at the looneys you got running the insane island asylum. CM had sex with CW--that's all that was proven. Maybe she enjoyed the black stud. Maybe it pissed a lot of LE off. No prints or other evidence at crime scene, but many of LE and firefighters. A local guy just down the road from CW said to me, "I will give my DNA when the Truro cops provide theirs first." Those calls to S.Yarmouth Barracks, DC not taking the stand, but having access to the evidence, and investigation when not assigned? Pleeeeeaaase! And wonder who's DNA was left at her house. You got corruption cover-up written all over this case!
bitter, I'm afraid an enema won't be enough for these rogues, more like a tidal wave in the shape of a female AG who needs to step in and do some heavy handed fixing. MARTHA, you got some much needed work to be done in this DA's office!!!
bitter, I'm afraid an enema won't be enough for these rogues, more like a tidal wave in the shape of a female AG who needs to step in and do some heavy handed fixing. MARTHA, you got some much needed work to be done in this DA's office!!!
Buzz [Member] writes:
bittersweet,
Regarding "you have just one thing wrong", I don't think I have anyting wrong, it's you that's confused.
McCowen may have "proclaimed his innocence" but he was found guilty in a court of law. I'm sure that Charles Manson, the Zodiac Killer and many other notorious killers have plead innocent, do you recommend we give them bail?
Regarding "you have just one thing wrong", I don't think I have anyting wrong, it's you that's confused.
McCowen may have "proclaimed his innocence" but he was found guilty in a court of law. I'm sure that Charles Manson, the Zodiac Killer and many other notorious killers have plead innocent, do you recommend we give them bail?
crusader [Member] writes:
And BTW, Peter, it's Governor Bradford, and I also have friends who live in the East side of Philly.
Buzz [Member] writes:
Crusader,
Reality check in isle 4. You accuse Peter of nasty quills and angst????? You've got to be kidding... no one can hold a candle to you when it comes to being "nasty". Don't you remember? You've denounced the entire Cape Cod population.
Reality check in isle 4. You accuse Peter of nasty quills and angst????? You've got to be kidding... no one can hold a candle to you when it comes to being "nasty". Don't you remember? You've denounced the entire Cape Cod population.
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Well after talking to a few locals, all I could get was "Follow the Money". I started with the Registry of Deeds in Barnstable. What an education! Take a look at what the stars of the story have been up to! Thats going to take some new research to be followed up on. The best and most fun was the OCPF Electronic Filing & Campaign Disclosure System. This will educate you not only on who some of he players are, but give detailed reports on contributions and expenditures, of every candidate. The totals are in from OCPF! Hang on, think about this the next time you go to Shaws. In a little over 2 years Our modest living DA O'Keefe spent over $15090.00 for lunch and dinners with supporters. (Don't Forget he ran unapposed) Ranging from Boston, to DC to Ca.,to Fl. and dropped $1000.00 in Hawaii,all listed as lunch or dinners with supporters. But was is as equally troubling is $11,259.50 dropped at the Ridge Club in Sandwich. (Accross the street from his abode) $800.00 for Shirts and balls(I guess balls)Grand Total $26,349. of your money.
bittersweet [Member] writes:
What good is a court of law when the court officers act unlawfully? (opinion)If this was your son, I doubt very much you would be ok with this whole shenanigan-laced,smoke-and-mirrors show. If a juror deciding your son's guilt or innocence thought he was "a scary guy", would that concern you?
if a juror deciding your son's guilt or innocence said."If a big black guy hit her like that, it would make those bruises", would you think, "What has big and black got to do with it?"Or,how's this one; remember that poster that was all over the Cape, proclaiming "Case Solved" BEFORE the trial even started? Any self-respecting father would be outraged and furious at the lack of justice for his son.And I feel the same way,simply as a human being. Jamie Floyd of court tv: "If I was on the jury, I could not find him guilty...not because I'm sure he didn't do it, but because I'm not sure that he did."
THAT is supposed to be our justice system. Oh, I forgot; A juror said, "what are the chances of them having sex?" That's it in a nut-shell!
if a juror deciding your son's guilt or innocence said."If a big black guy hit her like that, it would make those bruises", would you think, "What has big and black got to do with it?"Or,how's this one; remember that poster that was all over the Cape, proclaiming "Case Solved" BEFORE the trial even started? Any self-respecting father would be outraged and furious at the lack of justice for his son.And I feel the same way,simply as a human being. Jamie Floyd of court tv: "If I was on the jury, I could not find him guilty...not because I'm sure he didn't do it, but because I'm not sure that he did."
THAT is supposed to be our justice system. Oh, I forgot; A juror said, "what are the chances of them having sex?" That's it in a nut-shell!
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Hey Jeff, any comment on the persistent rumor that you were in the house on the day of the shooting? Your silence about this is troubling.
Crusader claims - "If O'Keefe declines to comment, it's an admission of guilt as many see it" - but when McCowen declined to testify during his trial, it had nothing to do with whether he was guilty, right?
Crusader claims - "If O'Keefe declines to comment, it's an admission of guilt as many see it" - but when McCowen declined to testify during his trial, it had nothing to do with whether he was guilty, right?
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Keep up those contributions to O'keefe. He will need it! The more you look the more fascinating it gets! The next site you really have to go to is Corporate Filings. But really, check them all. Its a great education and may make some people not only eat words, but crawl into thier little holes and wait for the fall-out. Happy surfing! Speaking of surfing I wonder if the DA tried his luck out with that when he was in Hawaii spending your campaign contributions. Just found out how to locate flight records. Might be a little costly, but the suspense is killing me. I wonder who may have made the trip to the Hula party with him? This is getting good, but as I am told also very dangerous. But you know, when your old, and are more concerned about making typo's and spelling errors between trips to the bathroom and looking for your glasses, its all good stuff! Jeff Blanchard keep up the good work. Was Jeff at the scene? What a stupid question? Careful Blanchard, sounds like a set up to me! Maybe time to check those connections, but leave that to me. Good Day!
crusader [Member] writes:
Maybe MO will be relocating to the sunshine state along with some of the rest of his rogues.
Jeff, there are lots of us behind you--keep up the good work. And, yes, do be careful with this crowd--lots of wolves in sheeps clothing.
"Commit a crime, and the earth is made of glass"---Ralph Waldo Emerson
Jeff, there are lots of us behind you--keep up the good work. And, yes, do be careful with this crowd--lots of wolves in sheeps clothing.
"Commit a crime, and the earth is made of glass"---Ralph Waldo Emerson
crusader [Member] writes:
BTW,
Does anyone know about a complaint made by Bob Kraft against O'Keefe? I wonder if it had to do with the way he uses campaign funds, but could be something else. Jeff, could you find out?
Looks like another campaign is looming just ahead---are some already beginning to worry if they will still have a job come next election?
Does anyone know about a complaint made by Bob Kraft against O'Keefe? I wonder if it had to do with the way he uses campaign funds, but could be something else. Jeff, could you find out?
Looks like another campaign is looming just ahead---are some already beginning to worry if they will still have a job come next election?
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Hey Crusader
Can you tell me anything about this guy Joe Buscone? He throws around money to the Cape Polls like nobodys business. No one wants to talk about him. This is getting addiciting. And who is Tom Hester. Would appreciate any info.
Can you tell me anything about this guy Joe Buscone? He throws around money to the Cape Polls like nobodys business. No one wants to talk about him. This is getting addiciting. And who is Tom Hester. Would appreciate any info.
crusader [Member] writes:
capewatchdog:
Have to get back about those names you ask. Could Buscone be tied in with Belloti and the mob lawyer, Joe Barillo who is also on the campaign contributors list? Tom Hester the MSP officer who was mentioned in the CM trial? Or a different Hester?
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=1014107&format=&page=2
"His list of campaign donors includes many high-powered movers and shakers, including former Hill Holliday ad honcho Jack Connors, mob lawyer Joe Balliro, former Attorney General Francis Bellotti and philanthropist David Mugar."
(I assume you saw that article already)
Have to get back about those names you ask. Could Buscone be tied in with Belloti and the mob lawyer, Joe Barillo who is also on the campaign contributors list? Tom Hester the MSP officer who was mentioned in the CM trial? Or a different Hester?
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=1014107&format=&page=2
"His list of campaign donors includes many high-powered movers and shakers, including former Hill Holliday ad honcho Jack Connors, mob lawyer Joe Balliro, former Attorney General Francis Bellotti and philanthropist David Mugar."
(I assume you saw that article already)
crusader [Member] writes:
Jeff,
I think you answered my question about "Kraft". I thought it was Bob, but it was a former employee of O'Keefe apparently who filed the complaint. Your previous blog read:
"It doesn't include his quickie marriage to and divorce from the metrosexual judge Joan Lynch, nor his firing of the butt-ugly Monica Kraft, who filed a claim against the office for something gender-related, no one remembers."
I think you answered my question about "Kraft". I thought it was Bob, but it was a former employee of O'Keefe apparently who filed the complaint. Your previous blog read:
"It doesn't include his quickie marriage to and divorce from the metrosexual judge Joan Lynch, nor his firing of the butt-ugly Monica Kraft, who filed a claim against the office for something gender-related, no one remembers."
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Ok, Thanks for your comments. Hester is SP and Buscone is a partner and now I understand the warning I got. Buscone is Northside marina ( In Dennis) and Hester is apparently a ranking officer in MSP, hence my previous warnings. (I was told both untouchable and to drop it) Historically when I'm told to drop it, it gets me going!!!! Anything you come up with is appreciated. Phone records would show some interesting calls to both parties. And thanks to some really strange internet providers you can get hose too!!! I may be in to deep. I'll check in tomorrow. I can tell you one thing! O'Keefe knows them all! The other thing I can tell you is this: If it were not for Jeff Blanchard ..........well we won't go there now. Thank you Jeff for being a great American......it may be bigger than all of us. It appears to have been going on for a long time and leads to the top of the pile!
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
You people are unbe;ievable. First of all anyone who has to ask who hester et al are knows nothing about cape Cod, its politics or its law enforcement. Second...what does the nature of Mike O'Keefe's campign contributions have to do with anything in this case where Crusader is coming very close to accusing him of unlawful behavior? The FACT is, kiddies...the only reason you know about who has contributed to O'Keefe and how much he has spent from his campaign funds and where and on what is precisely because he has truthfully and fully reported it all. Jeeeeezuz. Give me a break. Come up with some real news...some discoveries, some smoking guns...something new! Gossip is great as long as you see it for what it is: pointless and self-serving. If we were to cast a jaundiced eye on every politician's campaign finanves we would have a nearly empty state house and many other vacant elected positions. Let's try putting Crusader's life on the front page and seee how she responds...not the facts, just the inuendo and insinuations. And, no, I am not Porcupine.
crusader [Member] writes:
Try your harassment on someone who will shake and shiver. You must be one of MO's rogues. I've seen how the rogues use emotional blackmail on the innocent citizens who try and bring some justice to Cape Cod and an innocent blackman who doesn't deserve what he got.
Tell me why MO would say, "she would do her best friend's husbands, butcher, baker, an equal opportunity player, a pig".......this is no professional DA.
Why would he make such vile statements about a woman who was brutally murdered?
Was he jealous? Did he get rejected by Christa Worthington, maybe? huh?
They have already failed at trying to get me to stop blogging--the truth is already out, and I really didn't even have to try.
Tell me why MO would say, "she would do her best friend's husbands, butcher, baker, an equal opportunity player, a pig".......this is no professional DA.
Why would he make such vile statements about a woman who was brutally murdered?
Was he jealous? Did he get rejected by Christa Worthington, maybe? huh?
They have already failed at trying to get me to stop blogging--the truth is already out, and I really didn't even have to try.
magician [Member] writes:
Shouldnt This GUY Okeefe been thrown out of Court when he collaborated with the Writer Flook regarding Christa Worthingtons Life. You cant tell me he didnt get a peice of the pie from Her Book Profits. Where does The corruption End In Barnstables court. Instead of being reprimanded for Bad Behaviour , they are rewarded with Higher Positions of Power. Disgraceful if you ask me ? Who are the REAL CROOKS on Capecod. ? Those sitting in that Witch house they call a Court of LAW. What Law , The rules dont apply to these THUGS running a Court of LAW. MONEY certainly Talks.
crusader [Member] writes:
Who lined up CW's underwear all over her bed at the time of discovering her body? I wonder who at Hyannisnews.com is getting nailed for leaking the story out--someone said they have been talking about it for 3 months? Time to close down the shop and anybody else that dares speak about the towel man.
Interesting point Magician---my thoughts exactly. It seems MO wasn't really too upset at that self-serving writer otherwise she would have been tossed of the island. I wonder who else has profitted off her book--certainly wasn't TA who was in the process of sueing her, btw. That poor man has been through hell, too. I hope he got a settlement from the publisher. I think he was just another fall guy like CM. Tim if your reading this, my heart goes out to you, I hope you find some peace in all you've been through. Remember every dirty dog has it's day.
Interesting point Magician---my thoughts exactly. It seems MO wasn't really too upset at that self-serving writer otherwise she would have been tossed of the island. I wonder who else has profitted off her book--certainly wasn't TA who was in the process of sueing her, btw. That poor man has been through hell, too. I hope he got a settlement from the publisher. I think he was just another fall guy like CM. Tim if your reading this, my heart goes out to you, I hope you find some peace in all you've been through. Remember every dirty dog has it's day.
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Wonderful!
Peter, a smart person(or DA) never asks a question he or she doesn't already know the answer to, don't forget that. Sometimes a question is asked to solicit responces from people such as you....throw it out there and see what happens. I love how you lumped Hester et al and "Cape Politics or its Law Enforcement" in the same thought. Now you know why the question was asked. Your loyalty is obvious and there is nothing wrong with that. The problem is exactly what you stated. As far as a "jaundiced eye" on campaign funds, your exactly right. When the Office of Campaign Finance states Dinners and related epenses are a gray area they are right. Its the pols that abuse that slush fund from contributions that causes gas for the honest ones. 10X what others spend. Look past the end of your nose.... History repeats itself, why do these people give and continue to give? Research some public documents(court and others) and see who some of the contacts, friends, dinner buddies of some of the players are. It will open your eyes & your mind! Loyality is earned not paid for.
Peter, a smart person(or DA) never asks a question he or she doesn't already know the answer to, don't forget that. Sometimes a question is asked to solicit responces from people such as you....throw it out there and see what happens. I love how you lumped Hester et al and "Cape Politics or its Law Enforcement" in the same thought. Now you know why the question was asked. Your loyalty is obvious and there is nothing wrong with that. The problem is exactly what you stated. As far as a "jaundiced eye" on campaign funds, your exactly right. When the Office of Campaign Finance states Dinners and related epenses are a gray area they are right. Its the pols that abuse that slush fund from contributions that causes gas for the honest ones. 10X what others spend. Look past the end of your nose.... History repeats itself, why do these people give and continue to give? Research some public documents(court and others) and see who some of the contacts, friends, dinner buddies of some of the players are. It will open your eyes & your mind! Loyality is earned not paid for.
Buzz [Member] writes:
ALERT...ALERT....ALERT
Did someone open the barn door and let Tarquin back in????
Look at magicians entry above....check the spelling, it looks an awful lot like the dangerous Tarquin himself. Tarquin always spelled dont with no apostrophe.
Walter....help, Walter.....Tarquin's back.
Did someone open the barn door and let Tarquin back in????
Look at magicians entry above....check the spelling, it looks an awful lot like the dangerous Tarquin himself. Tarquin always spelled dont with no apostrophe.
Walter....help, Walter.....Tarquin's back.
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
Gee, I thought you guys knew all about this stuff. You know so much about everthing and everyone else:
Lining up Worthington's underwear on the bed, or anywhere else, has a specific purpose---sometimes people who commit this type of crime take trophies...such as articles of clothing...underwear. It would be a good investigative technique to line up the victims underwear and determine by color, count, style, etc....is anything missing? Gee....then if something matching one of the victim's remaining underwear items is found in someone else's possession...we might have a clue.In fact, this is pretty standard stuff for trained homicide investigators. Apparently it is not taught in Vicious Blog Methods 101.Idiots! Worthington travelled to Europe a good deal in her career and might just have had some underwear not commonly found in these parts...an even better clue. Match the labels, find the killer? IDIOTS!!
Lining up Worthington's underwear on the bed, or anywhere else, has a specific purpose---sometimes people who commit this type of crime take trophies...such as articles of clothing...underwear. It would be a good investigative technique to line up the victims underwear and determine by color, count, style, etc....is anything missing? Gee....then if something matching one of the victim's remaining underwear items is found in someone else's possession...we might have a clue.In fact, this is pretty standard stuff for trained homicide investigators. Apparently it is not taught in Vicious Blog Methods 101.Idiots! Worthington travelled to Europe a good deal in her career and might just have had some underwear not commonly found in these parts...an even better clue. Match the labels, find the killer? IDIOTS!!
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Was that a "click" I heard from Blanchard in response to my question regarding the rumor about him? Apparently he considers it beneath his dignity to respond. Kinda ironic when you think about it.
Buzz [Member] writes:
Jack,
Are you telling us that there is a question as to wether or not the author of this blog was actually in the house the day of the shooting?
Are you telling us that there is a question as to wether or not the author of this blog was actually in the house the day of the shooting?
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Yes, Buzz, there is a very persistent rumor about that making the rounds. A rumor that I initiated on this site yesterday. But as for starting a rumor or perpetuating one, what's the difference, right?
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Someone forgot to take their meds today!
bittersweet [Member] writes:
I don't know a thing about the politics of Cape Cod, or the police procedures during a murder investigation, but I do know when I'm being sold a line of crap. I want one of you oh so wise ones to tell me what proof there is that Christopher McCowen murdered that woman. And NOT the so-called "confession", because even the jurors didn't buy that. All you have is his dna, found in her body because they had a sexual relationship/one time encounter. YOU say it's rape, but where is the proof? Fingerprints? Pretty basic, right? No, not there. Murder weapon? Nope. Motive? LAUGHABLE! As a very wise woman reasoned on another site...why drive 25 miles out of your way on a freezing cold night to get some 46 yr. old p***y when you could really have any woman you want? Close by. And being stoned and "out of it"? Now, THAT"S idiotic. But, if you are as smart as you appear, surely you know that there were plenty of other reasons and people that might have wanted her shut-up. But, these people seem to be too connected/protected to be seriously put to the fire. Stupid me, I think that's wrong!!~
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Are those quite willing to suspend the presumption of innocence and hang a noose around a man's neck capable of answering a fundamental question -- namely, is there any difference between starting a rumor and perpetuating one? -- or does such a question detract from the camaraderie of a lynch mob?
clamshelli [Visitor] writes:
Jack Coleman:
Are those willing to suspend reasonable doubt, in a court of law, and hang a noose around a man's neck capable of answering a fundamental question - namely, is there any difference between a court trial filled with lies and manipulation and cover-up by our own LE, and a lynch mob?
Your question is not only ridiculous, but if you really did start a rumor, just to prove a point, it is all quite juvenile.
Are those willing to suspend reasonable doubt, in a court of law, and hang a noose around a man's neck capable of answering a fundamental question - namely, is there any difference between a court trial filled with lies and manipulation and cover-up by our own LE, and a lynch mob?
Your question is not only ridiculous, but if you really did start a rumor, just to prove a point, it is all quite juvenile.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
If starting a rumor is "all quite juvenile," clamshelli, how would you characterize perpetuating one - at the more elevated level of adolescent?
clamshelli [Visitor] writes:
IMO, Rumors of any kind, dont help any situation. Anyone that participates in the "rumor game", to me, shows lack of credibility. To reduce yourself to that level of the "game", IMO, is just plain silly. Besides making yourself looks silly...what do you think you've accomplished by that? Do you have a personal agenda as well?
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Not an agenda, clamshelli, but an aversion -- to reckless impugning of reputations. Sounds like you may have the same aversion if you'd think for a minute before you type. Look again at the third paragraph of the story here and its reference to "persistent rumors of a private, personal relationship between O'Keefe and Gryboski."
Is this an exception to your stated belief that "rumors of any kind, dont help any situation"?
Is this an exception to your stated belief that "rumors of any kind, dont help any situation"?
clamshelli [Visitor] writes:
Nope, not an exception. If this whole story is a rumor, then I disregard it as well. My comment, was directed at YOU, for admitting that you purposely started a rumor, to prove a point. Again, IMO, you now lack credibility, and showed yourself to look very silly and childish. Thats all. I have no opinion regarding this story...YET. Until there is proof to it, I will disregard it as rumor. Did I answer your question?
clamshelli [Visitor] writes:
Listen Jack,
I honestly dont know who you are. Are you some kind of reporter or news writer? If you are, then all I can say is WOW. Like officers of the law, and priests..and the like, I hold a news reporter to a higher standard. Tell me if I understand this correctly: You admit to PURPOSELY making up a rumor and publishing it, JUST to make a point? Is this true? Really?? Again, WOW. What paper do you write for?- IF you do. Because if I am understanding it, this way, then your newspaper has just lost credibility - In my opinion.
I honestly dont know who you are. Are you some kind of reporter or news writer? If you are, then all I can say is WOW. Like officers of the law, and priests..and the like, I hold a news reporter to a higher standard. Tell me if I understand this correctly: You admit to PURPOSELY making up a rumor and publishing it, JUST to make a point? Is this true? Really?? Again, WOW. What paper do you write for?- IF you do. Because if I am understanding it, this way, then your newspaper has just lost credibility - In my opinion.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Yes, clamshelli, that is correct - I purposely made up a rumor and published it in a comment here, then acknowledged authorship a day later - to demonstrate the ease with which a rumor can start. Much as a reporter may trespass at a nuclear power plant or similarly sensitive site to demonstrate a troubling lack of security. Your outrage at my trespassing is duly noted.
Several comments and counting from you and still no answer to the question I asked -- is there a difference between starting a rumor and perpetuating one?
As for my background, enter my name in a search on this site and you'll find plenty to read.
Several comments and counting from you and still no answer to the question I asked -- is there a difference between starting a rumor and perpetuating one?
As for my background, enter my name in a search on this site and you'll find plenty to read.
bittersweet [Member] writes:
I think it's much worse to call a case "solved" before a trial has even commenced. That's a much more serious violation of a person's life than starting a rumor.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
bittersweet, who is claiming this case is "solved"?
bittersweet [Member] writes:
I'm talking about the "other" case, where "case solved" was proclaimed after they arrested Chris McCowen before they had even set a date for the trial. Didn't you see those posters?
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
I did see them. I thought you were referring to the Gryboski case.
clamshelli [Visitor] writes:
Jack:
Excuse me, but Im not accepting your poor analogy of a reporter "trespassing" to test security. Is that the best you can come up with? I will answer your ridiculous question. Any rumor, started OR perpetuated is irresponsible, ESPECIALLY by someone who supposedly writes the news. As I said, I hold news writers to a higher standard. I dont need to do a search as to who you are. Your "demonstrating" your point shows me exactly what you are all about. I now know all I need to know about you.
Excuse me, but Im not accepting your poor analogy of a reporter "trespassing" to test security. Is that the best you can come up with? I will answer your ridiculous question. Any rumor, started OR perpetuated is irresponsible, ESPECIALLY by someone who supposedly writes the news. As I said, I hold news writers to a higher standard. I dont need to do a search as to who you are. Your "demonstrating" your point shows me exactly what you are all about. I now know all I need to know about you.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Couldn't agree with you more, clamshelli, that starting or perpetuating a rumor is irresponsible. Thank you for confirming my point!
crusader [Member] writes:
Why not just admit you screwed up, Jack.
It was a simple question--so why didn't the DA answer it Jack? Either he knows Ann G. or he doesn't. Why wouldn't he just admit that he knows her, or not? Isn't he obligated to tell the public--especially if he is going to be presenting this case? And why would JB post this story on the site if there is no truth to it? I don't believe any credible would open themselves up to that ---do you? And we know JB's got the credentials told to us by the man in charge.
And what about MS's comments from the newest blog by JB?
You admit your comment about JB being in the house at the time of the murder was made up to prove a point---but what point did you make exactly?
That your word is not reliable?
It was a simple question--so why didn't the DA answer it Jack? Either he knows Ann G. or he doesn't. Why wouldn't he just admit that he knows her, or not? Isn't he obligated to tell the public--especially if he is going to be presenting this case? And why would JB post this story on the site if there is no truth to it? I don't believe any credible would open themselves up to that ---do you? And we know JB's got the credentials told to us by the man in charge.
And what about MS's comments from the newest blog by JB?
You admit your comment about JB being in the house at the time of the murder was made up to prove a point---but what point did you make exactly?
That your word is not reliable?
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Crusader, is your venom toward O'Keefe so great that you are oblivious to seeing the rationale for what I did? Clearly so.
Having been burned by Maria Flook, ya think O'Keefe might be less inclined to schmooze when a reporter comes calling with an alleged story based on rumor and a coincidence?
Having been burned by Maria Flook, ya think O'Keefe might be less inclined to schmooze when a reporter comes calling with an alleged story based on rumor and a coincidence?
bittersweet [Member] writes:
No one around here can say anything about repugning anyone's character, after what they did to Christopher McCowen. (piece of trash, piece of garbage-man) The only reason they think it's so wrong now, is because it's being said about someone they like. But they didn't care, or have any hesitation to do it to Chris. So, I geuss since we've been accused of being childish, here's something my mom used to say to me: "What's good for the goose is good for the gander" or this one: "Don't dish it out if you can't take it." You want us to treat people respectfully? Do the same.
crusader [Member] writes:
I'm not the snake in the grass here, Jack. No venom--would just like a paid official to do his job, answer questions asked of him. Isn't he a PUBLIC SERVANT, sworn to uphold the law, & protect the citizens of the commonwealth? So far, all I'm seeing is sheer arrogance & "I will do as I please", attitude. There are plenty of others who disagree with CM's verdict & the way MO handles himself. I don't stand alone, just not afraid to speak up when I question something as outrageous at that trial--now this. He refused to answer a simple question asked by JB about AG. Why? What gives him that right? He is not above the law.
Maria Flook is an irresponsible, self-serving writer, many know that's true, but it takes two to tango- O'Keefe should never have revealed pre-trial evidence, photographs or comments of CW to her for that book which helped to prejudice the case & victim--also served as a benefit to others involved.
The DA should have known better, Jack.
Getting involved with the writer was a big NO-NO & hurt his reputation.
Maria Flook is an irresponsible, self-serving writer, many know that's true, but it takes two to tango- O'Keefe should never have revealed pre-trial evidence, photographs or comments of CW to her for that book which helped to prejudice the case & victim--also served as a benefit to others involved.
The DA should have known better, Jack.
Getting involved with the writer was a big NO-NO & hurt his reputation.
crusader [Member] writes:
Yes, bittersweet -- and
"People who enjoy living within homes transparent should remember to never hurl large boulders"
"People who enjoy living within homes transparent should remember to never hurl large boulders"
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Sure, Crusader, no venom - your several thousand previous venonous comments about O'Keefe aside.
Let me see if I have this straight - O'Keefe is clearly guilty of something, anything by his refusal to dignify gossip from a blogger, but McCowen - whose DNA proves he was at the scene of Worthington's murder, who lied repeatedly to police about physical contact with Worthington, who had weekly access to her property, who knew Worthington was vulnerable as a single mother without a male in the house, who had five restraining orders from five different women, who'd served time in prison for a burglary conviction and who by his own admission to police "put the boots" to her and assaulted Worthington before someone else allegedly murdered her?
Only in your Alice-in-Wonderland worldview, Crusader.
Let me see if I have this straight - O'Keefe is clearly guilty of something, anything by his refusal to dignify gossip from a blogger, but McCowen - whose DNA proves he was at the scene of Worthington's murder, who lied repeatedly to police about physical contact with Worthington, who had weekly access to her property, who knew Worthington was vulnerable as a single mother without a male in the house, who had five restraining orders from five different women, who'd served time in prison for a burglary conviction and who by his own admission to police "put the boots" to her and assaulted Worthington before someone else allegedly murdered her?
Only in your Alice-in-Wonderland worldview, Crusader.
crusader [Member] writes:
........they might just create an unforeseen avalanche"
bittersweet [Member] writes:
That was NOT his own admission! Mason is the one who said that CM said that....and the jurors dicounted Mason's testimony! You cannot keep using it if you are going to agree with the juror's verdict.
Everything you are spouting is heresay! Did it ever occur to you that Ms. Worthington asked CM not to say anything about them sleeping together?...I mean, just look at the pictures from this web-site. The public celebrations...the pictures of the beach....everything....it's all white people!!!!! The only time you see a black person is in the crime section (from what I can see) He was the ONLY black person in the area at the time from what I observed working around there. She may not have wanted it known either.
But back to the heresay...nothing you said there is PROOF of murder!!! It's your personal opinion of the guy, that's all.
And btw, that blogger who O'Keefe is refusing to answer to is his constituent and, in fact, his employer. These public officials take our money to work for us, and they are accountable to us. Isn't that how it goes?
Everything you are spouting is heresay! Did it ever occur to you that Ms. Worthington asked CM not to say anything about them sleeping together?...I mean, just look at the pictures from this web-site. The public celebrations...the pictures of the beach....everything....it's all white people!!!!! The only time you see a black person is in the crime section (from what I can see) He was the ONLY black person in the area at the time from what I observed working around there. She may not have wanted it known either.
But back to the heresay...nothing you said there is PROOF of murder!!! It's your personal opinion of the guy, that's all.
And btw, that blogger who O'Keefe is refusing to answer to is his constituent and, in fact, his employer. These public officials take our money to work for us, and they are accountable to us. Isn't that how it goes?
crusader [Member] writes:
Jack,
MO is set to present states evidence against AG --don't you think it is required he state he knows this woman personally? It's clearly a conflict of interest if true & case should be moved off Cape. Did you not sit next to me at the same trial or was that your imposter? Forget the bull --questionable testimony of MSP & witnesses who are known drug dealers some with lengthy rap sheets for assault & threatening with a deadly weapon on the lower Cape, who has an ex-Truro cop uncle, business owner with connections to MSP & also allegedly to the state house. NO motive & NO real evidence linking CM to the murder, Jack. Only consensual SEX. GS claimed to see the black van driver at the trial & told the local paper he knows the driver had no involvement in the murder--What? DM who was mentioned as JF's cell phone buddy, worked for MM (calls to SYP barracks)served 10 yrs. in Walpole for dismembering a body. What does that tell you? Allegedly LE had access to a lot more......
MO is set to present states evidence against AG --don't you think it is required he state he knows this woman personally? It's clearly a conflict of interest if true & case should be moved off Cape. Did you not sit next to me at the same trial or was that your imposter? Forget the bull --questionable testimony of MSP & witnesses who are known drug dealers some with lengthy rap sheets for assault & threatening with a deadly weapon on the lower Cape, who has an ex-Truro cop uncle, business owner with connections to MSP & also allegedly to the state house. NO motive & NO real evidence linking CM to the murder, Jack. Only consensual SEX. GS claimed to see the black van driver at the trial & told the local paper he knows the driver had no involvement in the murder--What? DM who was mentioned as JF's cell phone buddy, worked for MM (calls to SYP barracks)served 10 yrs. in Walpole for dismembering a body. What does that tell you? Allegedly LE had access to a lot more......
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Crusader, I think O'Keefe would be required to do far more than "state" to a blogger trolling for a story whether he had a, ah, "personal" relationship with Gryboski. I'm not a lawyer, but I think O'Keefe would be required to recuse himself as DA, just as he did when he was a witness to the shooting outside the courthouse last fall. That O'Keefe has not recused himself suggests to me he did not know Gryboski prior to the death of her husband.
Overheated gossip and the coincidence of Gryboski and O'Keefe previously living in the same neighborhood hardly constitute proof. Even another non-lawyer like you should know that.
Overheated gossip and the coincidence of Gryboski and O'Keefe previously living in the same neighborhood hardly constitute proof. Even another non-lawyer like you should know that.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Posted as requested by blogger Peter Porcupine -- "Porcupine had not visited Walter's Okefenokee for a while, but was alerted by his friend Mr. Coleman that his name was being bandied on a thread regarding the DA by Crusader and other lack-wits (Crusader - what DID happen to that prestigious job that Harvard was giving you, when you flounced off in a huff?).
"For the record, Porcupine no longer has an account to post on this site, nor will he have one in the future. Please regard this in the same spirit as those advertisements of old, which advised that a person was no longer responsible for the debts of another. Porcupine will not post or comment on this site, ever, and anyone claiming differently, with the exception of Mr. Coleman and his one-time notice, is a cad and a liar."
"For the record, Porcupine no longer has an account to post on this site, nor will he have one in the future. Please regard this in the same spirit as those advertisements of old, which advised that a person was no longer responsible for the debts of another. Porcupine will not post or comment on this site, ever, and anyone claiming differently, with the exception of Mr. Coleman and his one-time notice, is a cad and a liar."
crusader [Member] writes:
Jack,
So, you want to know where I work, is that it? I recall someone mentioning the town where a lawyer's summer place was too after the trial--another cheap shot. And considering the dubious behavior of some involved, it's best not to say where anyone works, lives, etc. That I have learned. I'm sure if we really want to start digging into people's personal lives as someone here on this board eluded to earlier, we could all come up with enough mud slinging to last a lifetime. Is that how you get people stop talking about the obvious truths? Threats as those 3 jurors have endured? And others who have information about the CM case that may shed some more light--yeah, I get it, it's only too painfully clear for those who have to live in a military state of silence and harassment if they cross the line. I tried to follow up with a local who had some interesting comments to share about LE--when I returned, the comment was, "can't say anything more, you know how it is to live in a small town." Yes, I do know. Enough said.
So, you want to know where I work, is that it? I recall someone mentioning the town where a lawyer's summer place was too after the trial--another cheap shot. And considering the dubious behavior of some involved, it's best not to say where anyone works, lives, etc. That I have learned. I'm sure if we really want to start digging into people's personal lives as someone here on this board eluded to earlier, we could all come up with enough mud slinging to last a lifetime. Is that how you get people stop talking about the obvious truths? Threats as those 3 jurors have endured? And others who have information about the CM case that may shed some more light--yeah, I get it, it's only too painfully clear for those who have to live in a military state of silence and harassment if they cross the line. I tried to follow up with a local who had some interesting comments to share about LE--when I returned, the comment was, "can't say anything more, you know how it is to live in a small town." Yes, I do know. Enough said.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Crusader, my lack of interest in where you work cannot be measured; I was conveying a comment from a friend. If you wish to take it up with him, you'll find his blog by googling Peter Porcupine.
bittersweet [Member] writes:
See that, now I thought someone had said that Peter Porcupine was a woman!! So, here's another old saying that probably would do us ALL some good: Believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear.
crusader [Member] writes:
Jack,
Why do you persist in such childish games? You think you can bother me with PP's remarks? Seems CC should be kissing ass to some academic institutions that suppliment jobs with grants for preservation and maintenance of your coastal habitat. And studying possibilties for your precious wind farm project.
I don't know, the issues seem to be racking up this week, all these blogs about MO; first his questionable campaign spending habits, AG being his neighbor, and now the Ptown incident.
Looks like he's up to his neck.
Why do you persist in such childish games? You think you can bother me with PP's remarks? Seems CC should be kissing ass to some academic institutions that suppliment jobs with grants for preservation and maintenance of your coastal habitat. And studying possibilties for your precious wind farm project.
I don't know, the issues seem to be racking up this week, all these blogs about MO; first his questionable campaign spending habits, AG being his neighbor, and now the Ptown incident.
Looks like he's up to his neck.
maverick [Member] writes:
Crusader...Love you but please give us a break and get a life.
Jack C. expresses his thoughts and opinions and is usually right on target.
You object to anyone left on Cape Cod. Your nemeses. Unless, of course, they were a drinking buddy of yours.
Please check your horoscope, look at the alignment of the stars and have a great night.
Jack C. expresses his thoughts and opinions and is usually right on target.
You object to anyone left on Cape Cod. Your nemeses. Unless, of course, they were a drinking buddy of yours.
Please check your horoscope, look at the alignment of the stars and have a great night.
crusader [Member] writes:
mav,
I see Jack is getting his old gang to rally around him. I have a life thanks, but will continue to fight for justice in the memory of CW and that trial. Walter allows me to write on this site because I've been here since 2004-why should I be silenced when many agree with me? They just choose to remain silent--it's all about self preservation. Why do you sway back and forth on this topic? You know I am right. It's time to clean house on Cape Cod, Mav. I will always have a place in my heart for the natural beauty of Cape Cod and some of its people, but you've got to get rid of those bad elements down there and you know what I'm talking about. Don't let Jack poison your mind. It's so easy to just blame it on strong women who speak out against violence. CW didn't have a chance against what she was dealing with, and now another woman's life is ruined, AG. We need better laws to protect women against violent men. I thought you had an open mind and compassionate heart.
I see Jack is getting his old gang to rally around him. I have a life thanks, but will continue to fight for justice in the memory of CW and that trial. Walter allows me to write on this site because I've been here since 2004-why should I be silenced when many agree with me? They just choose to remain silent--it's all about self preservation. Why do you sway back and forth on this topic? You know I am right. It's time to clean house on Cape Cod, Mav. I will always have a place in my heart for the natural beauty of Cape Cod and some of its people, but you've got to get rid of those bad elements down there and you know what I'm talking about. Don't let Jack poison your mind. It's so easy to just blame it on strong women who speak out against violence. CW didn't have a chance against what she was dealing with, and now another woman's life is ruined, AG. We need better laws to protect women against violent men. I thought you had an open mind and compassionate heart.
maverick [Member] writes:
Crusader..." I thought you had an open mind and compassionate heart ".
I do and thought the " black garbage man " was set up for the fall. And I have deep feelings for CW and her family.
Anyone who is violent with a woman or child in any way deserves the maximum.
I do not agree with Jack C. on many topics but he is entitled to his opinions as are you.
Wish you the best.
Jack
I do and thought the " black garbage man " was set up for the fall. And I have deep feelings for CW and her family.
Anyone who is violent with a woman or child in any way deserves the maximum.
I do not agree with Jack C. on many topics but he is entitled to his opinions as are you.
Wish you the best.
Jack
crusader [Member] writes:
mav,
I never said he wasn't entitled to his opinions. He is the one who is being unreasonable. You don't see me putting up negative posts about him that other's write (I know where a good one is hiding) that's not my style. I don't wish to resort to schoolyard bullying tactics--unless I am provoked. It's childish and couter-productive to this discussion. Your readers frown on it.
We are all entitled to our own opinions, as I am mine. There was plenty that came out in that trial to warrant an appeal/ and new trial.
I say BG should go for it--reel in those lines, batten down the hatches, full speed ahead, foot heavy on the throttle this time, break out the compass and set a course for the Island of Justice.
"Look out, what do you see"......."Not sure cap'tn.....
Looks like the S.S.M.O. ship maybe sinking and those who avoided the stand, some of those 10 witnesses may be jumping on the lifeboats"....
I never said he wasn't entitled to his opinions. He is the one who is being unreasonable. You don't see me putting up negative posts about him that other's write (I know where a good one is hiding) that's not my style. I don't wish to resort to schoolyard bullying tactics--unless I am provoked. It's childish and couter-productive to this discussion. Your readers frown on it.
We are all entitled to our own opinions, as I am mine. There was plenty that came out in that trial to warrant an appeal/ and new trial.
I say BG should go for it--reel in those lines, batten down the hatches, full speed ahead, foot heavy on the throttle this time, break out the compass and set a course for the Island of Justice.
"Look out, what do you see"......."Not sure cap'tn.....
Looks like the S.S.M.O. ship maybe sinking and those who avoided the stand, some of those 10 witnesses may be jumping on the lifeboats"....
maverick [Member] writes:
Crusader...I spend about five minutes a month on this blog during the summer.
I charter every day and don't have internet access on my boat at www.maverickchartersltd.com. Forgive me.
I agree with you regarding all the injustices on the Cape and think there should be a new trial. But, please do not hold your breath waiting for it.
Regards,
Jack
I charter every day and don't have internet access on my boat at www.maverickchartersltd.com. Forgive me.
I agree with you regarding all the injustices on the Cape and think there should be a new trial. But, please do not hold your breath waiting for it.
Regards,
Jack
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Hey there, Maverick, thanks for the compliment. How's the fishing?
crusader [Member] writes:
Okay Mav,
Your advice well taken and thanks for saying your peace. Be careful of those chopping waters out at sea, and may the sun always shine on you, wherever you may sail.
Warm wishes,
Crusader
p.s. Mav, gotta keep up with the times staying online via the portal of cyberspace. I sold my boat on ebay and it only took 2 weeks. That's where everybody is nowadays---for work or personal---buying and selling online is the way-to-go. Craigslist and ebay are the new consumer tools of the future.
Your advice well taken and thanks for saying your peace. Be careful of those chopping waters out at sea, and may the sun always shine on you, wherever you may sail.
Warm wishes,
Crusader
p.s. Mav, gotta keep up with the times staying online via the portal of cyberspace. I sold my boat on ebay and it only took 2 weeks. That's where everybody is nowadays---for work or personal---buying and selling online is the way-to-go. Craigslist and ebay are the new consumer tools of the future.
magician [Member] writes:
Great article Blanchard, we need more reporting of such quality. I was Trying to explain Today to a Social Worker How Chris McGowan was Indicted By Jeremy Frasier at The Grand JURY, all the WHILE Carrying Dave Murphys cell Phone. NOW Explain to me How a Murderer Dave Murphy never got mentioned at the Trial and Only served 9 years in PRISON ? and this Man was working in Eastham with Jeremey Frasier ????? and His cell Phone was part of the Crime.
bittersweet [Member] writes:
Yeah...it boggles the mind,doesn't it?
Jeff [Member] writes:
I gotta tell ya, Magic, the Worthington murder has always been a mind-bender to me...the nutty neighbor, the spatty constable, the perpetual ejaculator who sits atop our law enforcement pyramid, the kook from NYC who slaughtered that woman and fled to Tenn., it was tough to see the truth from here at home in my jammies, especially with no local newspapers worth slipping under my aging dog. But when Michael D. O'Keefe, the Cape and Islands District Attorney who lives in a gated golf community, told me through his unrequited publicist that Christa was a slut and a bad mother to boot, I stopped caring. Nuf said?
I've been stung by a narc in O'Keefe's employ, and I'd rather not bring them back into my orbit.
I've been stung by a narc in O'Keefe's employ, and I'd rather not bring them back into my orbit.
Jeff [Member] writes:
On the other hand, if the question is, did CM kill CW? What LE failed to consider before they settled on this as the way to go is: pinning murders on down-and-out men of color is so yesterday. If I were a betting man? The cop's kin did it, because narcs have neither a conscience nor a worry.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Are you forgetting, Jeff - CM was a narc too. And perpetual ejaculators aren't solely situated atop the law enforcement pyramid. They've also been known to work as trash haulers on the Outer Cape.
Jeff [Member] writes:
Oh, Jack. We are all human, right? The question is, are we better off tossing out the trashman with the trash, or digging for the truth until it hurts. I would feel much better with CM caged forever IF one could believe ANYTHING law enforcement around here says; if I could trust the lab, an acknowledged disaster, if I could trust the medical examiner, who is out of a job, if I could trust the DA, a master manipulator, if I could trust the state cops, a uniformed group of drug dealers with immunity, if I could trust the local cops, the first rung on the testilying ladder, if I could trust the government, which is waging war on two perpetual clocks, if I could trust the defense counsel, whose heart can be found at the bank, if I could trust the judge, who did not get to where he is today by taking on the establishment, and if someone could convince me that CM had so many willing partners he could afford to dispose of one as well-situated as CW, a beautiful, intelligent and loving woman whose life was extinguished by something subhuman, or several of them.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
A well-composed but flawed litany. Defense attorney Bob George has stayed with the case on a pro bono basis after the conviction; it doesn't appear to me that his motives are entirely crass. In contrast to many defense attorneys who read from the script, George seems to genuinely believe in McCowen's innocence.
As for Judge Nickerson, he went out of his way to be fair to the defendant and handle the trial judiciously. The only time McCowen spoke was after he was convicted and he thanked Nickerson for treating him respectfully.
I'd have more respect for the skepticism of critics of this case when it comes to claims of police misconduct if they can cite a single example of same. Mason and Burke had nothing to do with problems at the crime lab, and a three-year plus gap between murder and McCowen's arrest hardly seems like a rush to railroad. The cops first spoke to McCowen in person within two months of the murder, and were aware of his color and occupation. Three years would pass before he was charged.
As for Judge Nickerson, he went out of his way to be fair to the defendant and handle the trial judiciously. The only time McCowen spoke was after he was convicted and he thanked Nickerson for treating him respectfully.
I'd have more respect for the skepticism of critics of this case when it comes to claims of police misconduct if they can cite a single example of same. Mason and Burke had nothing to do with problems at the crime lab, and a three-year plus gap between murder and McCowen's arrest hardly seems like a rush to railroad. The cops first spoke to McCowen in person within two months of the murder, and were aware of his color and occupation. Three years would pass before he was charged.
crusader [Member] writes:
Jeff, well said. Jack, you still don't get it.
I use to think our justice system had few flaws, & most cops were good guys, especially MSP-- this case changed my mind of that illusion.
When my friend (well known def.atty) drowned off the coast of Nantucket last summer, right before the trial, I was plagued with even more skepticism. He was worried about some shady characters, he told a mutual friend. I called his office afterwards to inquire of the circumstances leading to his death. His personal assistant told me she was upset with the newspapers because they listed the cause of the drowning, as a heart attack which was incorrect. His last case was against a bad cop. He never did finish the case, because he ended up dead. Needless to say, the cop's case got dropped. My friend was very active in the democratic party. The family had a private service. Maybe this was just one bad accident and coincidence. Maybe not. How will we ever know? If his assistant said "not a heart attack"-why was it printed? I've lost faith in this system.
I use to think our justice system had few flaws, & most cops were good guys, especially MSP-- this case changed my mind of that illusion.
When my friend (well known def.atty) drowned off the coast of Nantucket last summer, right before the trial, I was plagued with even more skepticism. He was worried about some shady characters, he told a mutual friend. I called his office afterwards to inquire of the circumstances leading to his death. His personal assistant told me she was upset with the newspapers because they listed the cause of the drowning, as a heart attack which was incorrect. His last case was against a bad cop. He never did finish the case, because he ended up dead. Needless to say, the cop's case got dropped. My friend was very active in the democratic party. The family had a private service. Maybe this was just one bad accident and coincidence. Maybe not. How will we ever know? If his assistant said "not a heart attack"-why was it printed? I've lost faith in this system.
crusader [Member] writes:
So, my next question is---
"Is it easier to get rid of people on Cape Cod?"
The fact that the paper listed Cape Cod and Islands District Attorney's Office as who was appointed to investigate the cause of my friend's death, didn't make me feel all warm and fuzzy.
Especially, on the heels of CW's murder.
"Is it easier to get rid of people on Cape Cod?"
The fact that the paper listed Cape Cod and Islands District Attorney's Office as who was appointed to investigate the cause of my friend's death, didn't make me feel all warm and fuzzy.
Especially, on the heels of CW's murder.
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
"Why was it printed?" Crusader, ever cross your mind it was an honest mistake by a reporter acting in good faith? Take a look at any newspaper on any given day and you'll usually find corrections for just that type of error. Not every mistake is evidence of evil intent.
The presumption of innocence also applies to police and public officials, not just trash haulers with criminal records. If, that is, you believe in equal justice.
The presumption of innocence also applies to police and public officials, not just trash haulers with criminal records. If, that is, you believe in equal justice.
crusader [Member] writes:
Jack,
The reporter was specifically told that he did not suffer a heart attack. All I'm implying is maybe it was allowed to be written so the story would go away--not cast a shadow of foul play being the cause. This cop brought lap top dancers to his class, was suspected of payroll tampering and subject to lose his job, pension, maybe even jail time---but nothing was done to this guy. Why?
Naive people like yourself can continue to pretend that anyone who works in an official capacity under the cloak of LE--are good just because they play the part--some are "untouchables"--just like John Gotti, wearing teflon, the badge brings power, some will abuse that power. That is the grim reality of our justice system. Believe it or not. I've seen it up close and personal more than one occasion--from one neighbor, another- high ranking officer & prison guards at Billerica Correctional Facility. The stories are true--and the common denominator is the same--ABUSE OF POWER.
The reporter was specifically told that he did not suffer a heart attack. All I'm implying is maybe it was allowed to be written so the story would go away--not cast a shadow of foul play being the cause. This cop brought lap top dancers to his class, was suspected of payroll tampering and subject to lose his job, pension, maybe even jail time---but nothing was done to this guy. Why?
Naive people like yourself can continue to pretend that anyone who works in an official capacity under the cloak of LE--are good just because they play the part--some are "untouchables"--just like John Gotti, wearing teflon, the badge brings power, some will abuse that power. That is the grim reality of our justice system. Believe it or not. I've seen it up close and personal more than one occasion--from one neighbor, another- high ranking officer & prison guards at Billerica Correctional Facility. The stories are true--and the common denominator is the same--ABUSE OF POWER.
Buzz [Member] writes:
crusader,
When your done solving the CW murder, there's another injusitce in your own backyard.
You know, Eddie and his family still think he's innocent... get on it Sherlock!
“On July 23, 1995, Ryan Downing returned to his home after hanging out with a few of his friends that evening. When he entered his Somerville house, Ryan found his mother, Janet, lying in a pool of blood on the dining room floor. According to reports, Edward O'Brien claimed that he was attacked by two men at knifepoint behind the Somerville police department.”
When your done solving the CW murder, there's another injusitce in your own backyard.
You know, Eddie and his family still think he's innocent... get on it Sherlock!
“On July 23, 1995, Ryan Downing returned to his home after hanging out with a few of his friends that evening. When he entered his Somerville house, Ryan found his mother, Janet, lying in a pool of blood on the dining room floor. According to reports, Edward O'Brien claimed that he was attacked by two men at knifepoint behind the Somerville police department.”
crusader [Member] writes:
Buzz,
But seems like Cape Cod is turning up more & more dead bodies.....Linda Silva, Christa Worthington (who were known to have been with same cop, both were last seen at Gov. Bradford just before going bye-bye) my friend the lawyer, AG's hubby, the 24 year-old suicide by kayak....women in the dunes, some we probably don't even know about, what of those 8 herion OD's in Ptown years ago? I'd like to know what happened to my friend? I don't believe it was a drowning accident. He had 2 pools at his home. People are afraid to speak out about bad cops.
http://ledger.southofboston.com/articles/2006/07/19/news/news03.txt
What's with the laptop dancers at the Massasoit College? Are these guys into soliciting prostitution as well as other criminal activity?
And they send CM to prison. I bet there are plenty of LE that belong in jail instead of innocent black trashmen.
I hope one day CW's death is avenged & justice is done.
Cape Cod is supposed to be a crime free paradise--IS IT NOT?
But seems like Cape Cod is turning up more & more dead bodies.....Linda Silva, Christa Worthington (who were known to have been with same cop, both were last seen at Gov. Bradford just before going bye-bye) my friend the lawyer, AG's hubby, the 24 year-old suicide by kayak....women in the dunes, some we probably don't even know about, what of those 8 herion OD's in Ptown years ago? I'd like to know what happened to my friend? I don't believe it was a drowning accident. He had 2 pools at his home. People are afraid to speak out about bad cops.
http://ledger.southofboston.com/articles/2006/07/19/news/news03.txt
What's with the laptop dancers at the Massasoit College? Are these guys into soliciting prostitution as well as other criminal activity?
And they send CM to prison. I bet there are plenty of LE that belong in jail instead of innocent black trashmen.
I hope one day CW's death is avenged & justice is done.
Cape Cod is supposed to be a crime free paradise--IS IT NOT?
Buzz [Member] writes:
Of course you don't believe it was an accident, you believe in conspiracy theories.
Do you think your friend went for a swim and members of LE's dive team were under water waiting for him and pulled him under to make it look like an accident?
The article says that friends brought him to shore... did they see any bubbles from scuba tanks????
How do you live your life thinking that everyone's out to get you?
Do you think your friend went for a swim and members of LE's dive team were under water waiting for him and pulled him under to make it look like an accident?
The article says that friends brought him to shore... did they see any bubbles from scuba tanks????
How do you live your life thinking that everyone's out to get you?
News-Hen [Member] writes:
crusader, when will you be visiting the cape again?
Perhaps you can contribute to the pile.
Perhaps you can contribute to the pile.
Buzz [Member] writes:
Another thing. Cape Cod is NOT suppose to be a "crime free paradise" it never was and will never be.
I've lived and worked on the Cape long enough to know that it's no different from anywhere else.
I've worked in the news business and have seen a guy beaten, wrapped in a rug and dumped in the woods, a woman shoot her boyfriend and his lover and set the house on fire, a young boy brutally stabbed 70 times and left to die (by the way, a garbage man killed him) several domestic murders, a woman in PTown who had her hands cut off and they still don't know who she is, a caretaker in Osterville (never solved), a carpenter in Sandwich shoot and kill a young man..... on and on.
We are no different than Somerville, why don't you get that?
I've lived and worked on the Cape long enough to know that it's no different from anywhere else.
I've worked in the news business and have seen a guy beaten, wrapped in a rug and dumped in the woods, a woman shoot her boyfriend and his lover and set the house on fire, a young boy brutally stabbed 70 times and left to die (by the way, a garbage man killed him) several domestic murders, a woman in PTown who had her hands cut off and they still don't know who she is, a caretaker in Osterville (never solved), a carpenter in Sandwich shoot and kill a young man..... on and on.
We are no different than Somerville, why don't you get that?
crusader [Member] writes:
Buzz,
I'm talking about suspicious activities by your boys in blue that you refuse to look at and it should be treated no differently where it happens--Somerville, Boston, Quincy, Cape Cod, etc. There is a bad element in LE and it needs to be rooted out, otherwise I only see two things that will continue to erode our society:
Bad cops getting away with illegal activities and loss of public confidence in LE.
Some in LE believing they can get away with just about anything--from lap top dancers in a classroom, mishandling of department funds, illegal drug activities, even murder.
At least I have THE BALLS TO SAY what I believe to be true.
When our own FBI agent's can become corrupt (Connolly) who is the public suppose to trust? And Connolly soon found out just how expendable he was too, didn't he.
I'm talking about suspicious activities by your boys in blue that you refuse to look at and it should be treated no differently where it happens--Somerville, Boston, Quincy, Cape Cod, etc. There is a bad element in LE and it needs to be rooted out, otherwise I only see two things that will continue to erode our society:
Bad cops getting away with illegal activities and loss of public confidence in LE.
Some in LE believing they can get away with just about anything--from lap top dancers in a classroom, mishandling of department funds, illegal drug activities, even murder.
At least I have THE BALLS TO SAY what I believe to be true.
When our own FBI agent's can become corrupt (Connolly) who is the public suppose to trust? And Connolly soon found out just how expendable he was too, didn't he.
crusader [Member] writes:
Maybe if that story about the hot tub incident came out, people wouldn't believe CW was so bad afterall. So many interesting stories about bad LE from one of your own---I wish that woman came out to tell her story, but I can understand why she wouldn't.
Ringo, you better bring an army.
Ringo, you better bring an army.
bittersweet [Member] writes:
Peter-- You stated so perfectly (except for George's part) what so many people know, and so many other's won't even consider....until maybe it happens to them. And maybe by then it will be too late to do anything about it.
And I really wish Coleman could talk about this without throwing in some nasty crack about Chris. Which by the way, all have to do with his past, not the case at hand. Sending a man to prison for life should involve nothing less than a preponderance of the evidence and no possible iota of doubt.
All he and other's like him can say is "yeah, but Chris is a bad guy, so he must have done it." And that's how so many are around here are. Minds like a steel trap, and unwilling to see anything other than their own OPINION. That's not enought to throw away another human beings life. And they are throwing away Christa and her daughter too,by letting the real killer/killers walk!
And I really wish Coleman could talk about this without throwing in some nasty crack about Chris. Which by the way, all have to do with his past, not the case at hand. Sending a man to prison for life should involve nothing less than a preponderance of the evidence and no possible iota of doubt.
All he and other's like him can say is "yeah, but Chris is a bad guy, so he must have done it." And that's how so many are around here are. Minds like a steel trap, and unwilling to see anything other than their own OPINION. That's not enought to throw away another human beings life. And they are throwing away Christa and her daughter too,by letting the real killer/killers walk!
magician [Member] writes:
Great reporting Jeff. and very courageous too !
donovanatee [Member] writes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tK1O5NzUOiI
disenchanted [Member] writes:
And, isn't Judge Joan Lynch (sitting in Barnstable District Court) the ex-wife of DA O'Keefe??? Does anyone else think this stinks too? Nepotism at its best - or worst. She's a former ADA with over 70 appeals filed against her. Compare that with judges sitting in Barnstable far longer than she has.
This 'justice' system is a joke.
This 'justice' system is a joke.
crusader [Member] writes:
disenchanted,
Yes, and the good ex-wife defended the towel wearing DA against floozy flook...what a place. I'm afraid your outnumbered by the mobsquad and writer who helped covered it all up. They just made more drama to deflect the real story. All eyes on them and not the case.
Can you explain what you mean about 70 appeals--with regard to what type of sentencing? Guess she's helping her ex rack up those convictions. Maybe he too will be bucking for an ATF job someday.
And we worry about petty theives running around. It's certain people in power we must fear. They need to be exposed before they do more damage.
Yes, and the good ex-wife defended the towel wearing DA against floozy flook...what a place. I'm afraid your outnumbered by the mobsquad and writer who helped covered it all up. They just made more drama to deflect the real story. All eyes on them and not the case.
Can you explain what you mean about 70 appeals--with regard to what type of sentencing? Guess she's helping her ex rack up those convictions. Maybe he too will be bucking for an ATF job someday.
And we worry about petty theives running around. It's certain people in power we must fear. They need to be exposed before they do more damage.
disenchanted [Member] writes:
crusader,
Regarding judge's appeal record, check out the public site at http://www.ma-appellatecourts.org/search. Search by judge's name to find history of appeals on any judge.
It's more frightening than sad that power-hungry judges and D.A's find more (self) importance in accumulating convictions than administering 'justice'.
Regarding judge's appeal record, check out the public site at http://www.ma-appellatecourts.org/search. Search by judge's name to find history of appeals on any judge.
It's more frightening than sad that power-hungry judges and D.A's find more (self) importance in accumulating convictions than administering 'justice'.
bittersweet [Member] writes:
We can have justice whenever those who have not been injured
by injustice are as outraged by it as those who have been.
--Solon (594 B.C.) (no relation to the one on this blog)
by injustice are as outraged by it as those who have been.
--Solon (594 B.C.) (no relation to the one on this blog)
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Whitten Landscaping
Landscaping, construction, irrigation and maintenance. A reliable and dependable company that takes pride in its work and reputation. Over 20 years on Cape Cod! (Yarmouth)
Landscaping, construction, irrigation and maintenance. A reliable and dependable company that takes pride in its work and reputation. Over 20 years on Cape Cod! (Yarmouth)
Neagle & Associates
Making your business fun by making it work, Barry Neagle is a business and executive coach who can help your business with sales leadership and business planning. (Barnstable)
Making your business fun by making it work, Barry Neagle is a business and executive coach who can help your business with sales leadership and business planning. (Barnstable)
IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COMMENTORS & BLOGGERS: CapeCodToday now requires a one-time validation of your
account email. When logging in or registering for the first time, you will be emailed a link to click that will validate your
email and complete your login. The link in the email must be clicked in the same session when you are logged into the site for security purposes
(i.e. retrieve the email right away and do not close your web browser).
This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.
This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.
Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 3,189 registered commenters!
CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!
Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).
Previous/Next posts in this blog
About This Blog
Samizdat (Russian: самиздат) was the clandestine copying and distribution of government-suppressed literature or other media in Soviet-bloc countries. Copies were made a few at a time, and those who received a copy would be expected to make more copies. This was often done by handwriting or typing. (Credit; wikipedia)
Jeff Blanchard is a freelance writer who lives in Brewster. This blog is an archive of his past work.
Recent Comments
- Possee,
Who are the invited guests,and where can we meet??I am
1 min ago - Hey, Possee
Read the freaking bill, if you know how to
1 min ago - maverick, and invited guests..
Ok..m it happen!
Pick a central point for
11 mins ago -
"You may even cure yourself of cancer in the process".--
O
27 mins ago - Also Buzz regarding doctors and hospitals if reimbursement rates go
29 mins ago
- site sponsors -
CCT Blog List
Blogs with posts in the past 60 days are listed here in order of newest posts. For a list of all blogs, visit Blogs A to Z
- Newest Blog Posts
- Newest Comments
- Entering Bourne
- Entering Falmouth
- Cape Cod History
- Long Bridge Runner
- One Day at a Time
- EXTRA...
- Cape & Islands News
- DIY Marketing
- The Ballyard
- Sea Street
- Mr. Mom I am not
- The Poet's Perspective
- Cape Cod Barrister
- Media Watch
- Police and Fire News
- Latimer on Law
- Bill Snowden's Blog
- Wellfleet Bay Sanctuary
- Trail Hound
- Conservative's Conscience
- Letters to the Editor
- Cape Cod Rock Hopper
- Project I.E.P.
- Cape Cod Tracker
- Ned Sonntag
- Op-Ed
- Editorial
- Mahler's Music Notes
- Through a Washashore's Eyes
- Rep. Jeff Perry in His Own Words
- Off-the-Shelf
- Bismore Park
- Politicalendar
- CapeCodToday Arts Calendar
- Town Notes
- Cape Native
- Travel Tales
- Cape Eyes
- CapeCodToday Featured Event
- Off Cape
- Rog's Gallery
- The Belly Check
- Literary Pop
- Cape Yoga
- Historic Harwich
- My day
- The Natural
- Buckley's Blog
- Eastham Windmill
- Frugal Internet Marketing
- Washington Window
- Seufert's Scenes
- Massachusetts Paranormal Institute
- Cape Cod Pets
- Reflections on a Quarter-life Crisis
- Myrbie & Dax
- Cape Politics
- Gosnold
Archives
- April 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (8)
- January 2008 (11)
- December 2007 (4)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (6)
- August 2007 (4)
- July 2007 (1)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2005 (1)
- September 2005 (1)
Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!
Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?
If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.
Blog Newsfeed
CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.
Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "Samizdat" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.
