Fair 33.0°F Fair [Forecast] :: Friday, March 19th, 2010

Robbins Report

To preserve and protect
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Wengler Home Maintenance
Having one company take care of your home's maintenance needs saves you time and money. We do lawn care, painting, carpentry, gutters, dump runs, window cleaning, and much more. (Dennis)
Newbury Street South Salon & Spa
An ideal place to escape! Our commitment is that our team of professionals will provide the highest level of service for hair, natural nails, facials, massage, waxing and more. Specials available. (Harwich)

County Art Caper - "It's a witch hunt" she mumbled

When a Pol wants to avoid a lie, they say, "to the best of my knowledge"
Before going into the heart of this story, I want to set the record straight.

by Peter Robbins

First of all, when I watched the Fox 25 news last night, and prior to Mary LeClair giving her interview, you could hear her unmistakable voice in the background saying. "It’s a witch hunt."

Click to see and hear the video
Mary LeClair is saying "to the best of my knowledge" a lot these days. Click on the image above to hear her on FOX-TV last night.
Then the newsreel continued into the story.

I know in my first article, I made a comment referring to Margaret Hamilton and Judy Garland. I was simply referring to the way I, as a writer, was being treated. "It’s a witch hunt" are your words Mary LeClair.

For that Mary, I think you owe George Bryant a sincere apology. His interest generated mine. He has been making inquiries since 1991, and he is finally getting the attention he deserves. I’m sure Mr. Bryant has had moments when he would like to make some sarcastic comments, but he is to much of a gentleman for that.

Additionally, comments were made to give the Fox News team the impression that nothing may have happened or that the paintings may have just been thrown away. That is an outright misrepresentation of the truth in my humble opinion. If the paintings were simply thrown away, why are some of them still here?

Mary, you forgot about the record 
mary_leclair_with_loot_246
The Standard-Times states that 12 had been delivered and more were on the way, but Mary can only find these today.
If it never happened, why is there record of them? The 1941 article in the New Bedford Standard-Times states that 12 paintings had been delivered and more were on the way. Are we to believe that Dr. Julius Kelley, the superintendent of the hospital at the time, or Barbara Landers, secretary at the institution were liars? I don’t think so. The Fox 25 report was done very well. The disturbing part was that the reporter was mislead in a way  that reinforces my opinion that Mr. Bryant is due an apology.

Fox News reported that the three painting shown in the 1941 article were all in the possession of the County Commissioners. This isn’t something a reporter would know. They would have had to have been told that.

So, that is not true. Now, it could be true if paintings were returned since my Monday viewing, or it could also be true if the painting is hanging on a commissioner's wall. The painting being held in Dr. Julius Kelley’s right hand in the Standard-Times photo is a John Whorf painting which is believed to be the Old Colonial Hall in Wellfleet. It is not in the county's possession today, so let's let the "spin stop here."

julius_kelleywellfleet_hall_530_01
The painting being held in Dr. Julius Kelley’s right hand in the Standard-Times photo is a John Whorf painting which is believed to be the Old Colonial Hall in Wellfleet. It is not in the county's possession today.
What have we learned to date? 
Having said all this, let's examine what we all should have learned. Do you remember the Assembly of Delegates meeting two weeks ago when Mr. Bryant was allowed to address the attending County Commissioners and the County Administrator about his concerns over the county artwork?  It was hard for some of the Assembly members to imagine that artwork would be missing.

After the official meeting, Mr. Ronald Bergstrom the Chatham Delegate said, "You know, Chatham has a lot of artwork, we really are going to have to do something to catalog or record it." He and Mr. Bryant were talking about the need for an art commission.

Let's all learn from this
I know most every town has valuable pieces of art. I can tell you this, only a few of our towns could go to a central location and pull an inventory and a documentation of what art they have. How many towns can show a photograph of what they have? How about condition, age, artist or value ?

Fifteen years ago an inquiry was made of the Orleans Selectmen about some panels painted by Vernon Smith, a famous Orleans artist. At that time they were in the basement of the old Orleans Selectman Building. I’m not picking on Orleans, but if I were a betting man, I bet they could still be there. If not, where are they?

Here is my point. These pieces of art are national treasures. They belong to all of us, the taxpayers. The people we put in charge of these treasures should be held accountable. Whether it is a town, county, city or state government, their performance should be judged and they should be held accountable for how these treasures are cared and accounted for.

I am certain of one thing, because of the reporting on CapeCodToday.com on this issue , if certain towns do not have an inventory documentation program in place, they will have soon. Maybe it wouldn’t be a bad idea for the towns to combine efforts with the county.

Got a News Tip? Email me here."It’s a Blog, It’s a Blog!"

Read the seven previous installments of the county art series:

26 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.

03/05/08 @ 8:20 pm
bob [Member] writes:
I saw the reoprt too and thought it was very one sided. Never existed? Why would well known and respected artists have their names on a list of people that donated art but really never did? Mr Bryant IS owed an apology not only from Ms. Leclair but also from Fox for not interviewing him for the peice. I hope they do a follow up soon for the other side. Maybe its something better suited for Mike Beaudet with fox undercover.
03/06/08 @ 6:31 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
I bet Mary is treating you like I treat my husband when he tries to convince me that he needs a motorcycle.... I just sort of tune him out and hope his interest is diverted somehow.

Even if you're losing the fight decisively, you can still win if you absorb enough punishment that your foe just wears him/herself out eventually. Once they exhaust themselves, you pounce on them.

It's basically called Attrition, and you can read about examples of it in either the Vietnam War or Ali/Foreman.

It all comes down to greater Will.
03/06/08 @ 6:46 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Mr. Robbins, is it true you were fired by the county in the early 1990s and, if so, don't you think you have an obligation to inform the readers of that?
03/06/08 @ 8:12 am
Peter Robbins [Member] writes:
Jack,
I was so hoping someday I could talk more about the 1990's ! Yes, this writer was involved with a legal battle with the former sheriff which was very well publicized. Serving at his will, I was terminated, went through a legal process, reinstated and then chose to retire. This involved many political people and entities. I think you had better check back with Mary first If you want to go here! I would love the opportunity to start a series on that caper! Unfortunately, it would bring up issues involving some people that are no longer with us.
03/06/08 @ 8:35 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Lucky you, Mr. Robbins, here's your chance to talk "more" about it. When you say you "went through a legal process," I take that to mean you challenged your dismissal, correct?
03/06/08 @ 10:46 am
Opinionator [Member] writes:
I vaguely remember the CCT writing the name Peter Robbins in that mess years ago. Uh oh...do we have an axe being grinded here?
03/06/08 @ 11:05 am
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
To one and all

You are damn right PR challenged his dismissal...what seems to have been left out here is that he won! I was a witness to that entire process, including attending the final hearing of the county retirement board when all of the charges against PR were dismissed save one...just enough to hang him. As is typical of our county government they did not use a strong enough rope. Are we supposed to say that PR does not have the right to investigate this unbelievable breach of the public trust?

As for Mary...she volunteered for office, ran hard to get into office and can fairly be said to have volunteered. Boo Hoo does not do it, Mary...straight answers and competent management would be far better.

Throughout the entire fraudulent lynching he experienced at Mary's hands Peter Robbins remained a gentleman and a professional. He and his family paid a high price in many ways for what Mary and others did to him...he was the scapegoat for the very nonsense that we see continues today "On the Hill."

I admire his dignity and his good nature.So should we all. To hell with Mary.
03/06/08 @ 11:12 am
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
And by the way...if Peter Robbins is conducting a witch hunt, I think he has found his prey...what does that make Mary?

Thousands of dollars, perhaps tens of thousands of dollars of county owned property missing with no satisfactory accounting and all Mary can do is --- NOTHING.

I am going to search to see if I can find the episode of The Great Gadfly I did on Peter Robbins' situation. If I find it I will post on GOOGLE VIDEO with an explanatory trailer...Mary can then be a global dunce.

In October of 1994 I attended the annual symposium of the International Homicide Investigators Association in Reno, Nevada. Peter Robbins was on the board of directors along with the likes of Dr. henry lee, Terry Green of the FBI behavioral science unit and a few notables in the world of super cops. I watched as he was greeted with warmth and respect by national homicide unit directors from Europe, homicide and major crimes cops and officers from all over the U. S. and Canad and Mexico. then I watched Mary LeClair try to destroy him and his reputation back home. Something ain't right.
03/06/08 @ 11:27 am
Opinionator [Member] writes:
To Jack: You seem to have opened a Pandora's box. PR has the right to be an investigator of stolen art, but the axe he no doubt has to grind cannot help but compromise his credibility, no matter how many defenders of him or of ML come forward.
03/06/08 @ 11:36 am
mjsmom [Member] writes:
We don't discuss local politics. Any politics. Dicey. Go for it. We're just starving and want to eat at the Pearl.
03/06/08 @ 11:40 am
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
What "axe" do we suppose George Bryant is grinding?
03/06/08 @ 12:49 pm
bob [Member] writes:
If what he's reporting on is based on his insight and opinions, then yes his credibility is an issue. But if he is using facts that others have brought forward now for some time like Bryant, then he is reporting fact and his credibility is of no issue.
03/06/08 @ 1:06 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Peter writes - "all of the charges against PR were dismissed save one" - and it's that "save one" that makes all the difference. Whereupon Mr. Robbins, having been fired, promptly chooses to "retire."

Thanks for clarifying that, Peter, much appreciated, especially seeing how the person in question has suddenly developed laryngitis after having been so garrulous.
03/06/08 @ 1:56 pm
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
Jack

You are almost correct: Peter Robbins appealed his dismissal to the state and when folks on the other side of the table saw what was coming their way they decided to clear his sheet and the sheriff reinstated him.

It was not until he was fully reinstated to his job that peter Robbins retired...and I believe he did so without quotation marks around the word. the fact is, for those interested in facts, that PR could have remained in the sheriff's department, but for obvious reasons chose not to. Did he sue? No. Did he launch a public campaign to discredit those who treated him so poorly? No. He simply sucked it up like the mature person he was (and remains) and took his retirement...at a much lower level than if he had been allowed to complete his career without the political back-shooting.

When he retired his dismissal had been rescinded. The one charge that had been "saved" was gone. It was nonsense to begin with. I believe I made this clear in the original comment, but for those of you who insist...there it is again. He was cleared and reinstated. Period.
03/06/08 @ 2:03 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Jack C...wrong again my friend.

Maybe you are just on the wrong side of history.

Or that "dismissal" brings up bad memories.

Either way I still like you. I think.
03/06/08 @ 2:12 pm
capewatchdog [Member] writes:
Jack, Jack, Jack, get back on the meds! Did you miss your session this week?
03/06/08 @ 2:20 pm
mjsmom [Member] writes:
He's busy running marathons. Try it. The cramps might kill you.
03/06/08 @ 3:52 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Thanks again for clarifying, Peter, seeing how Mr. Robbins remains at a loss for words. Just out of curiosity, don't you think a more balanced approach to this inquiry would have included *both* county commissioners elected in the early 1990s - rather than just one?
03/06/08 @ 4:12 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Jack C... " Thanks again for clarifying "? Hello!!!

Jack, you just can't admit you were wrong. I think your upset that Peter is not only a few miles but light years ahead of you.

Stick to the history chronicles. You are on the right side there and I enjoy them.
03/06/08 @ 4:18 pm
mjsmom [Member] writes:
Aware of the boot, we not only want the bench and the calendar--check out falmouth's--and the scooters for the pd, we also want to invest some bucks into CCToday.
maverick, laugh.
03/06/08 @ 4:19 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Thanks for clarifying that you remain a twisted coot, maverick. Stick to running your charter boat, but try to spend less time in the sun.
03/06/08 @ 4:57 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Jack C...what is a "twisted coot"?

Bin fishing all my life and never heard of that lure.

Speaking of twisted who was right? You or Peter? Takes a big man to say he was wrong.
03/06/08 @ 5:26 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
That it does, maverick, which explains why you never do it. My problem is the opposite, being more than willing to challenge my own beliefs. Do the words "Chelsea power plant" ring a bell? How about "dredging"?

Your sniping here has nothing to do with the issue at hand and everything to do with Cape Wind. Takes a big man to admit that, which is why you won't.
03/06/08 @ 6:31 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Jack C...I appreciate your posts regarding the "Chelsea power plant" and "dredging".

If I am proven wrong regarding the siting of Cape Wind I will be the first to admit it.

Have I been wrong in my life? Yes. I married my first wife. Not her fault, mine. But I have four great children one of whom was an Olympic athlete four times over.

Please help me. When you post or comment about Cape Wind it is paid journalism. When I comment it is sniping.

I think my comments have everything to do with the issue at hand. And they are not paid for. Just from the heart my friend.
03/06/08 @ 7:22 pm
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
Hey Jack

Mary was the one who sat in on the Robbins Lynching, as a voting member of the retirement association board. That is why she was the one singled out for mention here. Ask a simple question...get a simple answer.
03/06/08 @ 7:34 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
And mine are from the heart too, maverick, which you would understand if you actually appreciated what I wrote about the Chelsea plant and dredging.

Any reason you have such difficulty believing that those in favor of the wind farm aren't motivated by greed or other base motives? In contrast to this recurring, nay, Ahabesque insistence on your part, I have no trouble believing that you, Cliff Carroll, Audra Parker, Sue Nickerson, etc., are motivated by your beliefs - period.

Why the stingy unwillingness on your part to extend the same benefit of a doubt to those with the gall to disagree with you?
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Your Tickets Now
Huge Selection of Sporting, Concert, Theater Tickets & More! Great Seats & Great Prices. Shop securely online!
Stove Place II
Wide selection of gas and wood-burning stoves, fireplace inserts, mantles, accessories and BBQ grills. The owner, Larry Carbonneau, supervises the entire installation of stoves, chimneys, plumbing and electrical components to ensure your satisfaction. (Harwich)
IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COMMENTORS & BLOGGERS: CapeCodToday now requires a one-time validation of your account email. When logging in or registering for the first time, you will be emailed a link to click that will validate your email and complete your login. The link in the email must be clicked in the same session when you are logged into the site for security purposes (i.e. retrieve the email right away and do not close your web browser).

This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.

Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 5,034 registered commenters!

CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!

Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).

Previous/Next posts in this blog

About This Blog

psr140_191Peter Robbins has spent 25 years in law enforcement, and has testified in many jurisdictions as an expert witness in the forensic field as well as traveling the world lecturing on physical evidence and pioneering new training programs.

He is Past president and co-founder of the International Homicide Investigators Association, Peter has received many awards and recognitions for his accomplishments in the forensic and law enforcement training fields and for initiatives in Multi-Agency Cooperative Efforts.

A native Cape Codder of many generations, avid photographer, licensed captain and family man, Peter and his wife have a private investigative and consulting business. He can be reached by email here

- site sponsors -


CCT Blog Tools

Login to comment or manage your blog:

Username: 

Password:     

Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!

Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?

If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.

Blog Newsfeed

CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.

Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "Robbins Report" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.

RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3