Cape & Islands News
The ideal newspaper should be "irreverent, rash, feisty, and really care." - Jim BellowsCreative movement, story enactment, theater games, music, imagination journeys and more! The Dramafun Players create original musicals and perform for the public! We offer quality, individualized instruction in a nurturing environment year round. (Sandwich)
Sandwich Community School for Early Learning Open 7am-6pm Registering for Fall! Extended Day for Your Kids Grs K-6. New! Part-time Surroundcare for children in 1/2 day Kindergarten! (Sandwich)
Major victory for Cape Wind against Alliance, others
As energy costs hit all-time record highs
Barnstable Court rulings favor Cape Wind
By Walter Brooks
Cape Wind Associates won another round against a group funded largely by the fossil fuel industry in court Friday when Barnstable Superior Court Justice Robert J. Kane ruled that the State of Massachusetts' environmental review of the proposed wind farm on Nantucket Sound was legally correct.

"Until this moment, Senator, I think I never gauged your cruelty or your recklessness... You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?" - Joseph WelchThe Town of Barnstable, the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, and a group of residents had all challenged the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act certification which allowed Cape Wind to seek permits to build a wind farm in federal waters off Cape Cod and to bring the connecting cables ashore here. The judge's ruling may also have saved the Town of Barnstable some very hight court costs as it attempted to blocked the first offshore wind farm proposed in the U.S.
4 0f 5 motions granted
The Alliance and the others failed to convince Judge Kane that the state should have reviewed the entirety of the project and not just the cable that will run through state waters and deliver the electric power from wind turbines offshore to the grid.
In the lengthy ruling released Friday, Judge Kane allowed motions by the state and Cape Wind asking for dismissal of large parts of four of the lawsuit's five complaints, including the claim that Bowles' review of the project was "arbitrary and capricious." He denied a motion to dismiss the fifth complaint because there is an administrative appeal under way.
Heating a home will cost double this winter, another era recalled
The ruling in a Barnstable Court made Cape Wind's victory all the sweeter given the overwhelming support it received in the vast majority of the 40,000 comments submitted to the U.S. Dept. of the Interior in its recently completed study scheduled for implementation this Fall.
On Thursday Federal regulators warned that America appears to be heading into a period of "significantly higher power prices that will last for years."
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said that higher fuel costs and rising costs for the construction of new power plants are the two main forces that will drive prices higher.
"This ruling is further proof that this special interest group will not succeed. It is also an overwhelming victory for the vast majority of Massachusetts citizens who support Cape Wind." - Barbara Hill. The relentless opposition to America's first offshore energy project by a group of super-rich owners of shore front homes as news reports indicate the heating the average home here will nearly double this winter, from $3,000 to $6,000, and as the cost of driving to work doubles as well, received negative reactions from many on Cape Cod yesterday. Some asked "where will I find the extra $6,000 next year?"
One Hyannis woman who obviously recalled the Sen. Joe McCarthy-US Army hearing which ended the reign of the worst American demigogue of the 2oth Century by Massachusetts attorney Joseph Welch, when she used the latter's words applied to our own Senator and the Alliance, "Until this moment, Senator, I think I never gauged your cruelty or your recklessness... You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"
When asked to comment of the decision, Barbara Hill, Executive Director of the 9,000 member grassroots organization Clean Power Now, said, "This ruling is further proof that this special interest group will not succeed. It is also an overwhelming victory for the vast majority of Massachusetts citizens who support Cape Wind."
22 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.
When offered their own blog here by a Cape Cod Today editor two years ago, the "gang" said their leaders (back on the Mother Ship?)said "No go," apparently preferring a guerilla blog hit squad to reasonable conversations "on topic." It's just a lot of "noise" to mask any "signals."
Their tactic is to insert lengthy off-topic anti-wind snippets out of context and lace their posts with vituperative irrelevance to drive away opinions, pro or con, legitimizing these discussions. Peter Kenny is their current High Priest of Perfidy.
If you wish to comment, simply ignore them and "write through." They are harmless visitors from another planet wishing to raise Earth's CO2 levels to habituate our world to their species. Let 'em all "come on down." Welcome to Earth!
And are you equally unaware that when electricity enters the National Grid it goes like water in a garden hose to the nearest users?
Come on, either you are pulling our leg, stupid or one of the jackels described above.
Are you aware that gas will one day cost $10 a gallon, not the $5 it will reach later this year?
The world's leader in wind turbine manufacturing is backing away from costly offshore wind, and suggests we do the same.
'Vestas calls for greater focus on onshore wind'
"As new report warns that the cost of offshore wind farms will soar, leading turbine manufacturer urges politicians and media to turn attention to onshore wind"
Well stated, Capecodjon. The Princes of Wind, Oil, Gas and Coal are all one in the same multi-national corporate giants attempting to separate us from our wealth, in monetary and real estate terms.
Walter Brooks condition in offering a Blog opportunity to me as a Cape Wind opponent required me to state that I work for the Alliance. As this is untrue, I have no Blog.
In the history of administrative law, governments are called upon to give equal representation to interested parties when cases of public policy arise. I argue that the monpolistic nature of power companies skews that balance, resulting in the companies being better represented than the average citizen. This imbalance also convinces me that the power companies really don't give a damn for the average citizen, thus the promise of wind farm benefits reverting back to the average citizen seems all to unlikely and hollow.
In a world where Exxon/Mobil appears before Congress to defend the consumer squeeze amid record profits, please forive me of being skeptical of the promises made.
I'm hoping you can help re: Cape Wind's cost of generated electricity.
Appendix F of the MMS DEIS prices Cape Winds output at $122/MWh. Recent Boston Business article by one George West (cross posted on the Alliance site) puts Cape Wind's output at about $150/MWh. So the Cape Wind output price is in the $122 to $150 range using 2007-ish pricing.
The recently released FERC report puts the 2008 forward price of electricity for the Mass Hub at $141/MWh.
These numbers seem to indicate that Cape Wind juice is only 6% more expensive than 2008 market rates. Assuming further price increases in coal/gas/etc., does this not then make Cape Wind juice increasing more attractive with each passing year?
Thank You
P.S. Re: your comments re: Vestas, I assume you got that from the same source as Mr. Kenney, correct? businessgreen.com?
Of course... this is coming from the girl who titles a lot of her entries about a rich Cape Cod housewife with Wu Tang Clan song luyrics, but I work more in mirth than CW or D'Alliance.
Welcome aboard Barbara..
It's been a long time and your insight is valuable..
There are those of us who question the overall validity and real savings of a Cape Wind project,never mind the aesthetics,but will be labeled such as members of the Alliance..
Any other point of view,or question, automatically enrolls one as a member..
welcome to pre-school 101..
I would then assume that any commenter in favor of CW is a paid member as well?
Add public subsidies, bonding, existing infrastructure and transmission upgrades, or operation and maintenance O&M costs that would eventually be borne by ratepayers and taxpayers.
Better still, don’t…
'Green goals hit by rise in offshore wind cost'
Fiona Harvey in London, Financial Times , 29 May 2008
“The construction of offshore wind farms is becoming more costly, creating further problems for the European Union in meeting its renewable energy target.”
'Offshore wind costs set to soar'
“29 May 2008 - The construction of offshore wind farms is becoming more costly, creating further problems for the European Union in meeting its renewable energy target, reports the Financial Times."
'Cost of offshore wind farms soaring'
“Higher prices for steel and copper are being blamed for the increasing unprofitability of offshore wind farms. A British firm that was going to build one now questions its viability. Stephen Beard reports from London.”
Thank you, Possee.
You're most welcome...
It is refreshing to read intelligent comments ..yay or nay
without the one sided drivle.
as stated a long time ago on B&W tv..
"The facts, mam, just the facts!"
keep up the comments!
I imagine, then, those not in favor of public land use by private interests would prefer nationalization of energy resources, as in done in many countries? If you're opposed to use of public lands by private companies, you surely are in the wrong country and place, for that practice is a century and a quarter old.
Onshore wind farms are nearly always more efficient than offshore farms, because they are closer to the distribution net. The major reason why people sought offshore sitings is because onshore they get extensive NIMBY opposition. Ditto sitings for refineries, the lack of which explains a lot about the price of gasoline, or even for oil and gas exploration.
See the push for offshore oil and gas derricks? How pretty would you think those would look near Nantucket Sound?
Since the environmentally concerned created a moratorium on drilling, refining,nuclear,etc on oil/energies companies since the early 70's..
well here we are now,dependent on foreign oil and all are screaming for alternative energy,after the fact..
The caribou run wild and free, fish and ocean wildlife are growing exponentially
around the oil rigs, no Chernobyls ever in the US, yet all of a sudden, they pay the price at the pump and cry..
be careful what you wish for..
Mr Rogers and WGBH can not save you from gas prices..
put down the spliff, get sober, and wake up to the real world..
The 60's are long over..
And wind power will not ever lower gas prices..
and electric cars..well ..do the math..
need electricity which is powered by coal..
what a quandry they are in now..ehh?
Construction costs are indeed rising. But you must be aware of the following...ANY type of power plant's construction costs are soaring. Coal, IGCC, nuclear, gas...all construction costs are soaring. This is not a unique or specific problem with wind technology.
For starters, see the FERC report at...
http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/06-19-08-cost-electric.pdf
See the "estimated Cost of New Generation" slide. Wind is actually on the lower end of the spectrum.
Possee...PHEVs and flex fueled vehicles (second gen biofuels) absolutely will reduce the need for petroleum. BUT...the juice to power the PHEVs must be generated from renewables, cleaner burning coal plants (IGCC), etc.
From your link:
“Wind power has no fuel costs, and so will generally operate when available. However, wind is a variable, weather-dependent resource. As a result, it will not make up a strong share of the Nation’s capacity needs over the next few years.”
Paris, France (May 28, 2008) – Supply chain bottlenecks and the resulting increases in capital costs for offshore wind power could create new challenges for Europe’s target of generating 20 percent of its energy from renewable resources by 2020, according to a new report by Cambridge Energy Research Associates, an IHS Inc. company:
“The rapid push to increase capacity will put the industry’s nascent supply chain under pressure and lead to higher capital costs. Offshore wind capital costs will increase not only due to increases in raw materials and engineering costs, as for other energy industries, but also due to specific additional pinch points in the supply chain. One of the major factors in the rise of costs is the lack of a sufficient number of purpose-built installation vessels to install the turbines, resulting in less efficient and more costly options being used.”
Who needs an electric car?
I'm not losing sleep or skin. Even in Massachusetts there are folks who have the foresight to see things can't continue as they are. This apparently does not include Cape Cod, however, whether it concerns oil fired power plants, nuclear, or shutting down the railway link to Hyannis when the area depends upon tourism and gasoline is heading towards $10/gallon.
Online shop for weathervanes, cupolas, finials, bird feeders, copper fire pits, and other quality copper accessories for the home and garden. We feature many beautiful nautical theme weathervanes that can be used as both interior & exterior decorations (Hyannis)
We hope you don't need glass but if you do call us, the auto glass specialists, a local family owned company. Servicing autos, vintage cars, commercial vehicles and equipment in SE Mass. with 4 convenient locations and mobile service to keep you mobile.
This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.
Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 3,358 registered commenters!
CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!
Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).
Previous/Next posts in this blog
About This Blog
These stories about Cape Cod and Islands are written by our staff. You are invited to comment on any story. Your opinion will appear on our front page immediately, and it will be archived and available on this site at any time at no charge by using the search element of the top of every page.
►Walter Brooks, Editor & Publisher
►Maggie Kulbokas, Editor
Recent Comments
- The fact of the matter is that al-qaeda etal ought
1 min ago - bitters bud OB is receiving the same treatment her nemesis
13 mins ago - Why, so glad you asked!!!
He's also the progenitor of the
48 mins ago - At this point:
"And here's another thing Uncle ronnie did as
5 hrs, 7 mins ago - Sure you don't want to add anything more?
5 hrs, 16 mins ago
CCT Blog List
- Newest Blog Posts
- Newest Comments
- EXTRA...
- Cape Cod History
- Entering Falmouth
- Long Bridge Runner
- Bill Snowden's Blog
- Police and Fire News
- Cape & Islands News
- Latimer on Law
- Entering Bourne
- Cape Yoga
- Wellfleet Bay Sanctuary
- The Ballyard
- The Poet's Perspective
- Cape Cod Rock Hopper
- Editorial
- Media Watch
- Mr. Mom I am not
- Politicalendar
- Cheap Eats
- Rep. Jeff Perry in His Own Words
- The Belly Check
- Conservative's Conscience
- Mahler's Music Notes
- Historic Harwich
- Off-the-Shelf
- Ned Sonntag
- Literary Pop
- Boston Bureau
- Frugal Internet Marketing
- Cape Native
- Sea Street
- Rog's Gallery
- State of Cape Cod
- Town Notes
- Solon Economou
- Cape Cod Barrister
- Cape Eyes
- CapeCodToday Arts Calendar
- One Day at a Time
- Cape Cod Tracker
- DIY Marketing
- Trail Hound
- Letters to the Editor
- Project I.E.P.
- Op-Ed
- Through a Washashore's Eyes
- Travel Tales
- CapeCodToday Featured Event
- Off Cape
- Bismore Park
- My day
- The Natural
- Buckley's Blog
- Eastham Windmill
- Washington Window
- Seufert's Scenes
- Massachusetts Paranormal Institute
- Cape Cod Pets
- Reflections on a Quarter-life Crisis
- Myrbie & Dax
Archives
- November 2009 (27)
- October 2009 (25)
- September 2009 (35)
- August 2009 (31)
- July 2009 (35)
- June 2009 (40)
- May 2009 (42)
- April 2009 (50)
- March 2009 (49)
- February 2009 (48)
- January 2009 (61)
- December 2008 (60)
- November 2008 (53)
- October 2008 (54)
- September 2008 (45)
- August 2008 (36)
- July 2008 (18)
- June 2008 (22)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (37)
- February 2008 (32)
- January 2008 (50)
- December 2007 (34)
- November 2007 (29)
- October 2007 (41)
- September 2007 (48)
- August 2007 (45)
- July 2007 (50)
- June 2007 (49)
- May 2007 (41)
- April 2007 (41)
- March 2007 (37)
- February 2007 (30)
- January 2007 (49)
- December 2006 (54)
- November 2006 (77)
- October 2006 (68)
- September 2006 (67)
- August 2006 (78)
- July 2006 (67)
- June 2006 (89)
- May 2006 (73)
- April 2006 (82)
- March 2006 (104)
- February 2006 (112)
- January 2006 (106)
Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!
Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?
If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.
I regret the demonization of Wind Farm opposition, and it is DISTRUST of the energy commpanies that spurs my opposition. It's funny when supporters accuse the opposition of being bought and paid for by energy companies, yet the energy companies would directly benifit from the wind farms, with no guarantee of kicking back the savings.
Ths issue is too complex to go profiling the supporters and naysayers of wind farms. In fairness I'll avoid generalizing about the supporters. Thanks!