Fair 82.0°F Fair [Forecast] :: Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Media Watch

This is a journal of media matters for Cape Cod. It is dedicated to the memory of Justice William Brennan who said, "It is from the First Amendment that all our other Liberties flow."
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Spiral Cone Ice Cream and Soft Serve
We serve 28 delicious flavors of hard and soft-serve ice cream, plus CRUNCHICREME! A whole new way to enjoy candy and ice cream together! (Falmouth)
Sparkle Edge Cleaning
Not your average cleaning company! We listen to each and every client to understand their expectations and provide services with complete satisfaction guaranteed. Cleaning homes and businesses since 2004. Free estimates and fully insured. (Dennis)

Fella said, "Cheer up, things could be worse." He was right.

Why the newspaper industry is on "the slippery slope"

What's different about this recession for the hallowed inky trade?

By Walter Brooks, Editor, CapeCodTODAY.com

Nobody noticed it when the good times were rolling, but the business model upon which the daily newspaper business is based simply does not work any longer, and it hasn't worked for a couple decades.

Here's why.

Over the last half century, after every recession, the newspaper industry uniquely recovered all it had lost. After each past recession, classified, auto and real estate ads came back to the daily press.

That's why the Fidelity Investment Company bought a couple hundred of New England weeklies and a half dozen dailies starting in the 1990s, calling their group the Community Newspaper Company, which is now owned by GateHouse Media and has eight mastheads on Cape Cod and the Islands.

Newspapers were a business Fidelity assumed was guaranteed to bounce back, and many if not most newspapers made over 30 percent. But after the last recession in 2001-2003 it didn't bounce back, and since then those three major revenue streams have all moved to the Internet.

Worse, publishers didn't notice that since around 1950, the newspaper industry's revenues growth no longer matched the population growth of our country.

There were 76 million Americans in 1900 and 276 million in 1999, almost 200 million more citizens during the last century, but daily newspaper circulations has lost nearly 20 percent of its total in only the last 16 years while the population soared.

Here are the reasons newspapers died

Until 1930 there was one dominant media in America:  newspapers.

A business either advertised in the local newspaper or printed up posters to paste around his town on walls. Newspapers garnered 94 percent of all the money spent in America to reach consumers, and 84 percent of all Americans read a daily newspaper in that decade.

Today, three generations later, only 17 percent of Americans under the age of 40 read a daily newspaper, and the industry garners less than 15 percent of all ad dollars. That's an astronomic market share loss.

Enter radio, television and cable

The first new medium, Radio, was born in the 1920s, and by the 1930s had grown into several major networks which all offered news every hour. Some more consumers decided that even this modest news coverage was all they needed, and they too stopped reading a daily newspaper.

After World War II the same thing happened again when television became a part of every American's life. TV offered an hour of news every night, and another big chunk of newspaper readers and revenue fell away

Indifference, inertia & drift

The newspaper industry pretty much ignored these two new, upstart media, but cable television really hurt with its 24-hour news cycle by CNN and its ilk in the 1980s. Now Americans could get a half hour of news whenever they wanted it, and like radio and television, it was free.

Then came the Internet.

Newspapers realized that this new medium was sort of like what they did, so soon every newspaper had a Web site, and almost always it was one which was useless to and disdained by the audience they hoped to reach with the Web.

The newspapers used "shovelware": literally uploading or shoveling bits of the same news they hoped consumers would also either subscribe to or buy on a newsstand.

But why would they? Again, another huge chunk of the population stopped buying a usual daily newspaper because they could get much of the same news on the online version free.

Worse, most of the old men in suits at the top didn't "use the Web" themselves, and hadn't a clue as to whether the people they hired to create and run their newspaper sites were doing anything which people under 40 would be attracted to in this new medium.

But there is another more basic reason that newspapers are dinosaurs. To illustrate it, here are two model, the first of your average daily newspaper today.

The print newspaper model;

  • On Day One, a reporter is assigned to, and covers a story for the next day's edition.
  • By late afternoon, he or she has written the story, a photographer or artist has added photos or art, and it goes to a copy editor.
  • After editing, the story eventually gets to the production department which turns it into a printing plate and it goes to the press room.
  • The presses roll around midnight.
  • On Day Two, the thousands of bundled newspapers, with ad flyers and pre-prints collated into them, goes out on dozens or hundreds of trucks to carrier people waiting.
  • By 3 a.m.,  most  carriers have yesterday's news and start delivery (see drawing on right).
  • At 6 a.m., yesterday's news is thrown on my driveway.
  • Around 8 a.m., I pick it up and read news the same story I saw on CNN 18 hours ago and read updated online this morning along with everything else which happened since..

Here's the Web model for an Online Newssite:

  • On Day One, a reporter is assigned and covers a story with his own digital camera.
  • By late afternoon, he or she has written the story, photoshopped the photos, uploaded it himself on the online news site he works for, and than even adds a headline on the news site's homepage. That's what this 78 year old journalist did with this story.
  • I can read it 18 hours before it's in a printed newspaper.

The cost of doing it the Web way is a tiny fraction of the Old Media way, and no young and active consumers are reading the newspaper version anyway.

36 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.

02/06/09 @ 3:51 pm
Richard [Member] writes:
Yeah, Walter, but only the technology changes, not the content -not really:

Civil rights leaders are a pain in the neck
Can't hold a candle to Chang Kai Shek
How do I know? I read it in the Daily News

Ban the bombers are afraid of a fight
Peace hurts business and that ain't right
How do I know? I read it in the Daily News

Daily News, daily blues
Pick up a copy any time you choose
Seven little pennies in the newsboy's hand
And you ride right along to never, never land.

"Daily News"
Tom Paxton
02/06/09 @ 9:43 pm
darrellmaurina [Member] writes:
This is one of the best analyses I've seen yet of the problems with the print industry. I've posted a weblink here on the Pulaski County Web, the companion opinion site to the Pulaski County Daily News, the online newspaper I own and run.

http://pulaskicountyweb.com/smf/index.php?topic=14553.new#new

GateHouse Media seems to be an especially bad example of how to run print publications. Here in the midwest, GateHouse is shutting down another newspaper, the Derby Reporter in Kansas. The final publication date will be 2/17 and six people will lose their jobs as a result. They prevously cut from five to three days of print. What isn't being as widely reported is that the Derby Reporter newspaper got into trouble because their local county government got mad at them and pulled their legal notices, prompting a lawsuit threat by the newspaper against the county. Years ago, picking a fight with somebody who buys ink by the barrel was a political death sentence; now it seems to have killed the newspaper.

For details: http://pulaskicountyweb.com/smf/index.php?topic=14536.new#new
02/07/09 @ 7:56 am
Walter Brooks [Member] writes:
A New England daily newspaper publisher friend wrote me:

"Unfortunately, Walter, no one has figured out how to make any money from a news site on the web, and that includes you. Competent reporters and design staff cost money, and the dollars that web sites command for their ad messages don't cover it. I'm not arguing that large newspapers face a possibly terrible future, but that certainly doesn't mean that the current web business model is the answer."

My good friend obviously doesn't read CapeCodTODAY or count the ads on it because our online revenue was up 18% last year and we routinely have a half dozen stories each day which our local daily missed.

He also forgets that web expenses are a fraction of those for print which like the old airlines have huge "legacy costs" and the rates will grow with the traffic which in our case was up 34% in '08 vs. '07.

And as the old media dies their ad base will migrate to the web as it has already.

"If you build it they will come."
02/07/09 @ 8:04 am
Jonathan [Member] writes:
Keep at it, WB! He also failed to recognize that bandwidth is not like newsprint, no need to throw away surpluses, not nearly as much risk of overshooting demand. It's a virtual win-win!
02/07/09 @ 4:36 pm
bipr [Member] writes:
Of course your costs are low, Walter - you don't pay for most of your content ;-). Newspapers still have to pay reporters. I'm not saying stick with the old model - obviously it's a dinosaur. And while your publication maintains high quality standards, there are overall fewer quality controls when speed is the primary criterion for running a story. I'm concerned we may be throwing the baby of professional journalism out with the bathwater. The questions is how do we maintain the best (certainly never perfect, but at least ideals) of professional journalistic standards with the efficiency and marketability of online news -- and pay reporters for quality work?
02/07/09 @ 5:20 pm
Walter Brooks [Member] writes:
nipr, Thanks for the kind words. I would love to see newspapers stay exactly the way they are - I love 'em and read a couple every day.
The cold facts are that the business model does not work in a wired world and add to that they have already lost they audience of younger, active consumers.
It's not the web's fact.
It's the fault of the dead-headed old men who have ignored every chance to save their publications for fifty years, and the free enterprise system has a cruel but complete way of dealing with such business stupidity and lameness.
Online News Sites will develop the same way the newspaper pioneers of a century ago did by plowing every dime back into content. The original Hearsts and Pulitzers cared about their own communities too whereas the Wall Street owners of today's newspapers do not.
It's over, and we'd better get used to it.
02/07/09 @ 10:25 pm
think4urself [Member] writes:
From an advertiser's POV, I stopped using the CCT because I got a better response to a free classified ad on Craigs List than I was getting for a paid ad in the Times. From a consumers point POV, why pay money for the same news and commentary I get free on line?
However, there is still something I miss online which drives me to purchase a hard copy of the CCT - the ads, specials, & coupons particularly in the Sunday edition.
02/08/09 @ 8:40 am
Shecky [Member] writes:
As readership shrinks, further cuts will reduce local content, and readership will shrink again until the newspaper is so small no one will pay 50 cents for it and it will end. As the column above states, they're on the slippery slope and doomed.
02/08/09 @ 9:13 am
crusader [Member] writes:
On the green perspective-sticking to web-only-news venues saves trees and eliminates waste. Many news savvy visionaries are already on board. Maybe if the corporate paper giant allowed freedom of the press, more would have remained loyal readers. Now people have more varied choices with just a click away. You just can't beat it. The younger generations don't touch a newspaper. It takes too long to find articles and easily stored on their computers for easy reference. The internet has revolutionized how we acquire information--who could refuse it's arrival at warp speed?
02/08/09 @ 9:15 am
christy at christy's [Member] writes:
this piece is worthy of a Harvard Business School case study. One needs only to view the newspapers stacked up for sale in a c-store or newsstand. Reminds me of the old adage, "pile it high and watch it die".
02/08/09 @ 10:41 am
insubordinate [Member] writes:
All that's been said here about newspapers in general is true. The Cape Cod Times, however, has added a new twist to their demise. They've made a hypocritical decision to support the rich, selfish Cape Wind opponents and at the same time portray themselves as a supporter of renewable energy projects. This has spoiled the credibility of all their editorial efforts. I cancelled my subscription.
02/08/09 @ 11:02 am
bipr [Member] writes:
Walter, you misread me. I agree online is what's here and what will be for the next generation, and overall there are a lot of good things that come from it. On a national level, I hope the quality publications will rise to the top of the very mixed bag of what's out there. But there are (were?) some good ideals from the "old journalism," like fact-checking, having an editor give a second look at a piece before publication, and having a clear command of the English language, that I hope we can preserve. Sometimes these are sacrificed for speed and cheap content. You're doing a great job. I was referring to complexities in the global trend.
02/08/09 @ 12:35 pm
Walter Brooks [Member] writes:
bipr, you're right. I did. Thanks again for the kind words.
02/08/09 @ 3:31 pm
roger [Member] writes:
Walter--you've done a thoughtful, well researched piece on the demise of an institution. Someone sarcastically commented to me in the 1980's, that "Laziness has replaced incompetence as the hallmark of the journalist!" Harsh but with an element of truth:

1. print media scribblers have become cut-and-pasters, using other sources (Associated Press, etc.) to flesh out their stories. Papers are filled with syndicated stuff.

2. Beginning with Woodward and Bernstein in the early 1970s, the leading newspaper types began to tell us what to think, and how to think, and even if they were proven right, they shut out a large segment of their audience who disagreed with their "GOTCHA" stories.

3. The Internet killed the old media as quickly as i-Tunes wiped out the CD market. Instant gratification is the byword, and newspapers cannot offer that to their readers.

4. Newspapers are complaining about their lot, and this makes them seem all the more pathetic, sadly. Papers might examine why books continue to flourish when the e- and audio book trade is also going strong in spite of the surge
02/09/09 @ 10:43 am
mark thomas onosko [Member] writes:
Let's face it, electronic media has taken a BIG bite out of our industry. Some call it progress. We compete daily against broadcast. Now there's one more competitor in the marketplace. We've all got to learn how to battle this media, just like the others who haven't gone away.
As for the IDIOTS that said that our industry is antiquated and wasteful, the next time you need a permanent record of something vital, go look and see if the memory in your computer will spit it out for you.
In the early '80s I watched a report on the PBS on "home computing" I responded in a radio interview that year that the state of newspapering would be changed forever by the advent of the home computer. Yes, I was grateful that I purchased my first Mac back then but was also aware that the industry would be changing. (I was told by my older brother to get rid of my exacto knives and tech pens while I could still get money for them). Ten or so years later the internet was in full swing.
Let's face it. It's all about revenue. Look at where newspaper stocks are valued against their revenue reports. It's sad, but the emphasis is more on the bottom line than excellence in reporting. Newsroom cuts are prompted by the fact that these positions are no producing revenue. It's sad but true. It's also survival.
After 30+ years in this business, my opinion is newspapers aren't dead. They're just wounded.
02/09/09 @ 10:50 am
Walter Brooks [Member] writes:
Mark, your points are well taken as far as they go.
However, increasingly daily newspapers are NOT a permanent record of anything. The so-called "newspaper of record" was doomed as soon as Wall Street owned the industry and forced the lay-offs of local reporters to make their demanded profit margin.
And what does it matter is a tree falls in the woods to make your daily newspaper if no one under 40 is reading it?
02/09/09 @ 11:11 am
crusader [Member] writes:
Mark Thomas,

Another contributing factor is the newspaper industry is restrained by lawyers.
Readers now have the ability to scan various on-line sources. The people become jaded when journalists were turned into speech writers. If we got the hard facts on the Iraq war, state of the economy, illegal wiretapping, destruction of our delicate ocean, land ecosystems and air pollution, etc., maybe Murdoch wouldn't be worried. A great paper allows a true journalist to write the truth, no matter the risk or cost. Anything less is not worth the ink. "The Insider", 1999 with Al Pacino and Russell Crowe going up against the tobacco industry. Where have the real journalists gone? Hopefully, Obama will allow open door policy to the press as promised. Censorship breeds mistrust. "All the Presidents Men". That's why we have blogs.
02/09/09 @ 11:18 am
jones [Member] writes:
I read CCToday and other Cape blogs along with the Cape Cod Times, The Register and the Voice. Their is a lot of competition between you all and that is very good for us all...but I sence a chip on your shoulder against the print media. In todays blog entry i can feel the glee you have in sticking it to the local papers. If the local papers went under, where would you get your news from? You have one full time reporter vs. hundreds. That one reporter could not cover what the local papers cover, be honest here! I enjoy reading your one or two daily blog entries, but I also enjoy reading the hundreds of daily stories and blog entries connected to the Cape Cod Times and other Cape papers and sites even more!!!
Instead of beating the drum for the demise of print media, get out there and cover more news on your site every day and forget about slamming print media all the time. If you were honest, you would admit that you need the Times, The register and all the others!
02/09/09 @ 1:04 pm
Jonathan [Member] writes:
Mr. Jones. Your points are well-taken to a certain extent, but I do agree with Walter's assessment as well, that no one under 40 is reading them, or very few.
I stopped getting the Times about 10 years ago and I only regret its absence slightly. You can get the same news, weather and commentary for free on the web, and who on earth is going to pay for costly print advertisments anymore?
Craigslist is free and far more effective. Where you pay by the word in a print ad, which limits your ability to fully describe anything you might be selling, you can get loads of space online, and as far as CL, you can post full-color pictures of your widget. Imagine what it would cost to put full-color pictures into your print ad?
02/09/09 @ 1:57 pm
jones [Member] writes:
Jonathan. If you look only at the business model of print media, you miss the point. Newspapers are important to a community because we need to know what the town budgets are and who is stealing your tax dollars or hiding the truth from you. Newspapers may not catch em' all but they are the"Fourth Estate." A power and force for good, to shed light on all the corruption and graft that lubricates our society. and if you think one or two reporters at a blog are going to take it's place, I got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you on Craigs List.
02/09/09 @ 2:38 pm
Jonathan [Member] writes:
Re:jones
I am trying to think your point through, of why the print media alegedly has so much more pull, is so much more responsive and has so much richer content than its internet counterparts.
I look at things case by case and make the judgements I see fit. Here are a few things I noticed recently.
The recent story about the Tribal election was covered by cctoday on the 8th. Cape Cod Times covered the same story a day later, today.
Cctoday actually has video for the story posted here. CCtimes does not.
cctoday shows a certain transparency by not only showing the day every article was posted,but also the time, down to the minute. Cape Cod Times does not.
jones, you cite town budget concerns. If you search this site you will find just such content. As far as corruption and contraversy, that's fair game here too. I disagree with the idea that internet news sites somehow lack the journalistic integrity and muckraking instinct of the old newspapermen.
02/09/09 @ 3:41 pm
jones [Member] writes:
Jonathan. A lot of content from this blog and others are gathered directly from the Cape papers, so my point stands, if the Cape newspapers are no longer there...the one or two reporters at CCToday could not cover what the papers cover. And, yes I do worry about where my taxes go. The Cape Cod Times lead the coverage on regionalization. That, I think will be the only solution to state cuts to local aid. Do we really need 50 town employees for each town, doing the same tasks?, when we could have one Cape agency to collect taxes and distribute that revenue to all the Cape towns. Do we need a separate Police, Fire and water department with millions of tax dollars in department overhead. Blogs and reporting websites like this are good in a supplementary way, but not in a lead role. And the last time I checked there was a lot more people 40 and older living on the Cape getting there news by reading a newspaper. And the trends into the future are that young people are leaving the Cape and Islands in droves for greener pastures and better job opportunities.
02/09/09 @ 6:10 pm
petapiperpickedapeck [Member] writes:
Prediction:

Within 5/10years the Times will be a weekly and their online version will be updated continually...

Then... What will happen to the Barnstable Patriot they bought a few years back?
02/09/09 @ 8:03 pm
piggie [Member] writes:
jones posts:
"A lot of content from this blog and others are gathered directly from the cape papers, so my point stands"

Let me get this right:
So most of us are sitting around our computers with stacks of old Cape Cod Times and "other cape papers" trying to come up with material to post??

I think not.

02/09/09 @ 8:07 pm
piggie [Member] writes:
By the way--

I like the illustration at the top
of this story. Don't lose that artist.
02/10/09 @ 7:22 am
Ned [Member] writes:
piggie brings up an ethical issue that I thought I'd Commented on before and now don't see. Where's that illustration from and who drew it? As I said it's in the style of my old pal Harry Pincus. Just Googled him, though... he seems to've left the biz in 2000... Anyway that ain't right not to identify the artist and original source of the illustration...
02/10/09 @ 8:05 am
jones [Member] writes:
More importantly, was the artist paid by CCToday or is he one of there many unpaid staffers?
02/10/09 @ 8:43 am
Jonathan [Member] writes:
I think the Times intentionally pares down its blogging content so as to maintain the impression that quality content is ONLY available from dyed in the wool journalists. If you look at their blogs they are mostly text, with precious few photos. One blog describes someone's journey across the nation. THERE ARE NO PICTURES! That seems weird to me, and further underscores the notion that we are talking apples and oranges.
I understand the allure of the newspaper, that visceral joy of handling fresh newsprint. I started many youthful days at dawn, cutting the bundles and slinging the canvas over my shoulder so I could deliver the news to my customers.
I remember how newspapers used to be. On Sundays the thing would be heavy as hell, full of useful coupons and timely information. Slowly the coupons became less useful and the information less timely.
Imagine the dilemma faced by the Times. One one hand its site needs to be on par with the competition. Conversely, it can't be so good that readers will see the printed form as useless.
02/10/09 @ 9:48 am
Ned [Member] writes:
Are you kidding? This illustration looks to be from the Wall Street Journal, Barron's or Kiplinger's. Somebody got real money for drawing this. And I can guarantee that it's copyrighted by one of the financial journals, maybe or maybe not in conjunction with the artist.
02/10/09 @ 10:33 am
piggie [Member] writes:
The illustration is now missing.
We have acquired the wrath of the gods.

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:J9h9W_sUsWIJ:www.capecodtoday.com/blogs/index.php/2009/02/06/fella-said-cheer-up-things-could-be-wors%3Fblog%3D14+mark+your+points+are+well+taken+as+far+as+they+go&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-a
02/10/09 @ 10:44 am
CCToday [Member] writes:
The topic is the condition of today's daily press.
Please try to keep the focus there because we welcome your comments on the very important issue of the survival of America's printed press.
We would welcome anyone's letter to the Editor on supplementary subjects. - The Editors
02/10/09 @ 11:12 am
jones [Member] writes:
Jonathan, are you one of the volunteers, and/or cheerleaders at CCToday? If you go through CCToday content on a daily basis, it's a Herald story, a story from the Globe, reworked content the local newspapers, one CCToday story from the one paid (?) staffer James Kinsella and a few blog entries from unpaid volunteers. The lawsuit that almost changed the free-and-loose bogosphere, Gatehouse vs. the New York Times will eventually take place with other media houses. The Times paid off Gatehouse because they knew they were wrong for stealing content. When this gets settled in the courts and blogs can no longer borrow content...what will happen to CCToday? Those penny ads can only pay for so many staffers.
02/10/09 @ 11:32 am
piggie [Member] writes:
As time goes on, this site will get more
hits, will be able to charge more for ads and hire more staff if needed.
Like the increase in internet usage,
I can foresee this happening.
I'm not worried about CCToday, PROVIDED
that they do not deviate from their
editorial course.





02/10/09 @ 12:14 pm
possee [Member] writes:
jones

The worlds most hit website is all feeds
no editorials..just headlines and links
I believe CC2day will survive just fine and is the most accessible site, easy to navigate, quick to link, etc etc.
Plus we are all given a point of view to express, within gudelines, and that is the most important feature!
No fairness doctrine imposed...

possee
02/10/09 @ 2:05 pm
Walter Brooks [Member] writes:
While the only three things which will last forever are death, taxes and herpes, I hope our dear readers take solace in the fact that we live here too, unlike the owners of most other media left standing.
In fact, my wife's family goes back to Edward Bangs, one of the original settlers here in the mid-1600s.
02/11/09 @ 1:56 pm
roger [Member] writes:
This Republic will survive with a smaller print media, but the blogosphere will continue to be a confusing, biased, and incoherent place, to which millions will flock hourly, as they look for guidance (or what passes for it) in the world of bytes and headlines. And so it goes, as Kurt V. might have said, and did.
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Aging In Place Cape Cod
A group made up of local professionals committed to helping our seniors stay in the home they love. Check our website for upcoming seminar dates, times, and locations. (Barnstable)
Printex
Quality ink and toner at a super savings! A local green company that offers excellent customer service, personal service, and free delivery to your home or office. Contact us today to see how much you can SAVE! (Dennis)
IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COMMENTORS & BLOGGERS: CapeCodToday now requires a one-time validation of your account email. When logging in or registering for the first time, you will be emailed a link to click that will validate your email and complete your login. The link in the email must be clicked in the same session when you are logged into the site for security purposes (i.e. retrieve the email right away and do not close your web browser).

This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.

Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 4,881 registered commenters!

CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!

Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).

Previous/Next posts in this blog

About This Blog

hat135Up-starts, up-smarts, other cranks & dilettantes adorn a media scene once renown for excellence, so this journal will attempt to point out the more obvious foibles and triumphs of the local press to our gentle readers and fellow Cape Codders.

- site sponsors -


CCT Blog Tools

Login to comment or manage your blog:

Username: 

Password:     

Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!

Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?

If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.

Blog Newsfeed

CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.

Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "Media Watch" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.

RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3