Aaron Maloy's Blog

Should we vote for Sarah Peake or Don Howell?

Maybe we won't have to put up with another two years of "her"
The "Queen of Corruption" gets a Progressive GOP challenger

For her fellows gays, Sarah is a Goddess.  Don Howell is not a lesbian. He is a heterosexual married man.The "Queen of Corruption" will have a challenger after all.  It didn't come as a  surprise when former Harwich Selectman Don Howell announced that he is challenging Sarah Peake for the House seat in the fourth Barnstable  distric. 

Don Howell and Sarah Peake have a lot in common. They are both old;  a little too old to be running for such a position that should be held by someone with high  energy.  Both of them were selectmen for several years. Both of them are liberals.  Both of them have a special bond with Cynthia Stead (the ultra-liberal State Committee woman).  Both of them are staunchly in favor of abortion, gay marriage, and sometimes higher taxes.

No GOP lesbian patronage ring

But there are also a few  important differences.  Sarah Peake on several occasions has been exposed for rewarding her campaign donors and campaign workers with high-paying government jobs. Coincidentally, all of Peake's patronage recipients were old butch lesbians, just like her.  Unlike Peake, Don Howell hasn't formed a lesbian patronage ring.

Speaking of lesbians, Representative Peake is a lesbian, and she uses it for her advantage.  If you investigate where her vast political contributions comes from, you will find that she is very well liked and supported by three main constituencies: special interests, dopey  Ptown gay men, and old lesbians.  For her fellows gays, Sarah is a Goddess.  Don Howell is not a lesbian. He is  a heterosexual married man.  But, similar to Sarah's political strategy, he does use his heterosexuality to his political advantage (nothing wrong with that).  His major supporters are poor families from Harwich, unlike Peake's super wealthy gay business elite.

After old lesbians, hateful  middle aged gay men are definitely Sarah's next biggest constituency.  On her website you will see a picture of her singing the national anthem with Ptown selectman Austin Knight at a baseball game in Orleans.  They thought they could fool all the normal families by "appearing" normal and patriotic. Selectman Knight was one of Peake's biggest supporters and a top deputy on her campaign in 2004 and 2006.

Peake called Shirley Gomes as a "bitch"

While campaigning for her in 2004 he referred to Shirley Gomes as a "bitch," because she didn't support gay marriage. But why should he care about gay marriage? Knight was just busted for sexually harassing male town employees while using taxpayer-funded resources (town cars and more!).  He thought he could use his position as selectman to get young male town employees to entertain his unfulfilled sexual desires, just like his buddy Sarah Peake uses her political clout to reward the lesbians. But Selectman Knight took it a step too far. Unlike Peake,  Don Howell steers queer... I mean steers clear of wacky gays.

Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound and Sarah

Based on my own inside knowledge, this is how the Alliance was able to indirectly funnel money to Sarah Peake and influence her position. Speaking of Austin Knight. His ex-boyfriend was a Director for the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound. Based on my own inside knowledge, this is how the alliance was able to indirectly funnel money to Sarah Peake and influence her position.  Unlike Sarah Peake, Don Howell has a hard time raising special interest money because he isn't good at sleazy money laundering tactics like Sarah is.

Big money vs. big ideas

Sarah Peake comes from wealth, and I mean BIG MONEY. So does her lover. She has never had to struggle a day in her life.  Hence she is known in Ptown as being an A-Gay, a term that is used to describe Provincetown's gay ruling class.  The Ptown gentry LOVE her. And as she campaigns about how much she cares about the poor, her friends who own businesses in town pay their workers minimum wage and treat their workers worse than animals.  Several of Sarah's closest friends are known for humiliating their workers and sometimes not even paying them. 

She's a DINO* and he's a Liberal Republican

Unlike Sarah, Don Howell is a true "bleeding heart" liberal. While she gets ripped and parties with her rich elite friends, he is down in the trenches with the people that Sarah and her friends exploit. Sarah down deep is really an elitist Republican in Democrats' clothing. After all, she comes from a family of Republican elected officials. Lucky for her, they are far enough away in New York (where my family used to have clout in Democratic politics).  So the moonbat liberals will never find out.

I think that this race will definitely be an uphill battle for Howell. Sarah Peake is no dummy. She has spent years cultivating a very wealthy and powerful following. Howell, on the other hand thought that organizing and mobilizing the poor was the way to go. But this is Cape Cod, not a factory town in the midwest. The conservative working-class families who support Howell can be easily crushed by the financial muscle and influence of the Lower Cape's gentry liberals.

Two candidates and five months to decide

So who should we vote for? We have 2 candidates and 5 months to decide. One is a family man who took in and adopted foster children. The other is somebody who lied her way into office to promote her own personal interests and agenda. Howell works as a drivers education teacher and spends his free time  helping youth and families. Peake does the photo ops with regular people and children, then drives home to Ptown to resume her social life with bizarre and eccentric gay women. Somehow I think that voters attitudes could change. It's up to Howell to expose the incumbent Representative for who she really is.

*Democrat In Name Only.

89 comments »

Hate Mail From Anti-American Gay Marriage Lobby Rank-In-File

Below is an email that I received from Anti-American Gay Marriage militants from Canada. I think this speaks for itself.

Re: You From: Kieran & Margaret Earles Sent: Fri 2/15/08 11:40 AM To: Aaron Maloy (staterepmaloy@hotmail.com)

Thank you for noticing.  My e-mail to you was a protest against your conservative stance.  How can you as a gay man align yourself with right-wing bigots?  You truly are a traitor, because when you support conservatism and bigotry you are stabbing the rest of us in the gay community right in the back!   You are nothing more than an Uncle Tom, and you should hang your head in shame.  The people at MassEquality and other human rights organizations are fighting for our, and your, human rights and freedoms.  How dare you slander them with malicious lies.    There, I've made myself known, and got your attention.  Be loyal to the community you belong to, and stay out of the pay of bigots.  A conservative is worse than a Klansman, because he pretends to love democracy.   I am just glad I live in a free country like Canada.  America is a racist and homophobic country.  

Thank you.  

Kieran Earles Newfoundland, Canada

Gotta love those liberal extremist Canadians who hate Americans.

11 comments »

Top Gay Marriage Lobbyists Busted for Raping Pre-Teen Boys

Earlier this week the  business and lobbying director of the gay rights machine MassEquality, also a Deval Patrick Aide, was busted in Florida for Raping a 15 year old boy while vacationing in Florida. Then today it was revealed that Provincetown Human Rights activist John Perry Ryan was arrested for engaging in child pornagraphy, also while on vacation. Carl Stanley McGee, now also one of Deval Patricks highest paid staffers, played a key role in defeating supporters of traditional families in the legislature and replacing them with candidates financed by MassEquality donors. He also used MassEqualities powerful "machine" to help Patrick win the Democratic primary and general election. Governor Patrick really appreciated this and rewarded him with a $150,000.00 a year job as an executive manager in his office.  The residents of this State should be appauled. But then again this is Massachusetts, where this kind of behavior seems to be acceptable. If you speak out against the sleazy wing of the gay community, it not very politically correct for the liberals (and the quick to sell out Republicans).

When I ran for State Representative in 2006 I begged to media and voters to be very cautious when blindly throwing their support behind candidates who were backed by gay "human rights" groups and special interest homosexual lobbyists like MassEquality. I refused their support for a reason. I knew that they were run and financed by a lot of sleazy perverted gay men.  If that offends you, go visit these perps in jail, because you probably shouldn't be lurking in public areas either.

I can't even count the amount of time that I was yelled at and called a self-hating homophobe because I refused to be bossed by MassEquality and other gay power brokers from Beacon Hill. I couldn't in good conscience allow myself to be corrupted by people who were turning being gay into a business and recruiting high school and college students to be their soldiers. My opponent Sarah Peake, and all those other legislators who sold out did, and many of them were very aware of the sleazy nature of those running the organization.

The day before my election last year I got a call from a college age phone banker from MassEquality. He told me that he was calling on behalf of a "pro-family equality organization" and that the fate of thousands of families depended on me voting for Sarah Peake in the election the next day. "Oh yeah" I replied. "Why is that?" I asked him. He told me that Sarah Peake's Republican opponent (me) would strip away people's rights and enshrine discrimination into the constitution. Basically he was using deceptive language from a script that he was reading from. In reality he was saying "Vote for Sarah Peake.  She let our pedophile Business Director help her raise $150,000.00 from rich gay men and she will do what we say."

I asked him how old he was. He told me that he was 18 and a freshman in college. Stunned by this I outed myself to him and told him  that I was that "Republican opponent" of Peake's. I also mentioned that I too was gay and had no desire to strip away people rights or enshrine discrimination into the constitution. He was speechless. "Don't let those people at MassEquality use you like that," I urged of  him. I let him know that I was also young, gay and naive at one point in my life too and that he should focus more on studying for his finals than being an agent of the power and money-hungry agenda of MassEquality's sleazy businessman. At this point he could no longer use his script and almost uttered a sincere apology to me. I, unlike Sarah Peake or the cronies at MassEquality, wasn't trying to use him for my political benefit, and he realized this.

This should send a very important message to voters in Massachusetts. In the upcoming legislative election those legislators who allowed this pedophile business director at MassEquality who was caught raping a 12 year old boy to raise money for their campaigns and help them get elected should be defeated. The two gay powerhouses who were recently busted while engaging in sexual behavior with pre-adolescent boys during their out of State vacations had no business influencing Massachusetts legislative elections. Both of them were the leading homosexual marriage advocates, and both of them ran smear campaigns against people with sane views on marriage like myself. THEY ARE THE VERY REASON WHY I TOOK THE POSITION THAT I DID IN 2006. I saw who was running the gay marriage agenda and said, "NO THANK YOU." My opponent Sarah Peake is on record attending MassEquality parties, begging them for more support and sending them a letter urging them expand, broaden and fortify their agenda here in Massachusetts. IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT FOR YOUR CHILDREN?

42 comments »

Democrats Can't Fix This Republican Recession

We are in a recession. Thanks to Bush and an incompetent Congress the value of the American dollar is plunging, families are being toppled by shattering mortgages, people of all ages can't make ends meet, the cost of living is out of control, the stock market is crumbling and the list goes on. But don't look to the Democrats for our economic salvation.  This crisis is beyond partisan politics.

 The real reason why our economy has soured stems from one origin. Most of the  people who manage our economy have little to no business or economic experience. "Oh, but that doesn't matter. What matters is where they stand on the issues like health care, gay marriage, education and labor," say the Democratic machine liberals. "What matters is how well they can inspire hope," say the looney tooney liberals. Both are wrong. In the private sector when businesses compete what truly matters is the competence of the chief executive, not his or her own personal "feelings."

Consider an analogy using two multi-national businesses. Lets say that they both produce the same commodity. In order to stay in business one of these corporations must dominate the market, operate efficiently, keep costs low and motivate, train and retain high quality employees. Most importantly, the chief executive must not allow profits to to drop. These are all basic principles of business and economics. Moving up the corporate ladder is also  a principle of business economics. So it follows that the chief executive of the world's largest economy should have the substantial business and economic experience. Which business would survive, the one whose CEO was some  Republican career politician or Bill Gates?

We have seen the negative effects of career politicians on our nations economy. Many, if not most of the Republicans in the Republican dominated congress had zero business experience. George Bush had business experience, but he went out of business, prompting him to run for Governor of Texas. So it was only inevitable that we would end up in this recession. What else do you expect from an unqualifed congress and a president who's experience in the private sector demonstrates that he is not a competent manager? Instead all we have heard is "we must fight the terrorist enemy, lower taxes is better, we must secure our borders, blah, blah, blah."

Can you imagine selecting a random Republican congressman or even George Bush and making them the CEO of a fortune 500 company? Of course not.  That's why both the former and latter are unfit to be controlling the fate the largest business conglomerate in the world. And that's why both are responsible for laying the framework for our current recession. Thanks to the Democrats taking control of congress, it couldn't have come any quicker.

Amid swelling economic disaster partisan politics is not working for our country. Our next manager can't be some hillbilly (Huckabee), or drag queen (Guiliani), or poet (Obama), or lawyer (Clinton) career politician. This is a very serious time for our country. Voters seriously need to wake up from the day dreams evoked by the rhetoric of Rhapsodizers like McCain, Clinton, Obama, Huckabee, Edwards and other do-nothing politicians. Yes, they speak beautifully. I admit to having felt sympathy for Clinton when she cried, despite the odds of it being staged. I agree that Obama's stories about hope are inspirational and make you "feel good." I admire McCain for being a prisoner of war. But that is not a prerequisite of managing an enitity that determines not only the state of our economic health, but the economic prosperity of developing nations in the third world.

None of the leading candidates have the business skills that it takes to rescue us from this recession. Up until last month we did in fact have hope. It wasn't from Obama's beautiful words, but from Mitt Romney's record of building some of the largest international businesses and turning around both the Olympics and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. He was the only CEO in the pack. Now with his campaign smashed to pieces by the "feel good"rhetoric of do-nothings like McCain and Huckabee, we are left with only career politicians to choose from. This brings us back to the fortune 500 analogy. Do you think that Hillary or McCain or Huckabee or Obama have the business skills to propel the USA into economic prosperity during a time when corporate genius Presidents of other countries are preparing for a super competitive economic smackdown with the United States? The answer is no.

Unless a more qualified candidate enters the race we are doomed. As Senator of NY Hillary Clinton did nothing for her state. Same for McCain, Obama and Huckabee. In fact, several of these candidates exacerbated the social and economic welfare of their respective states. Now with the only candidate with success in the private and public sector gone, we must be unorthodox in recruiting our next leader. Our only hope lies in Michael Bloomberg, who has hinted at running for president over the past few weeks as an Independent.

Even more impressive than Romney, Bloomberg is a billionaire who, unlike Romney, wasn't born with a diamond-laced golden spoon in his mouth. That's exactly what we need right now. If Michael Bloomberg can go from a poor post-holocaust Jew to the 34th most wealthy billionaire in the world, and clean up the mess made by Rudy Guiliani in New York, he, and only he, has what it takes to reverse what has happened and what is happening to our country.

11 comments »

Ron Paul Disses Minorities, Kerry Healey Hisses at the Gays

Just as I was about to solidify my support for a Republican Presidential candidate, I was hit again with another bomb. After reading  the piles of dirt that was dug up on all the Republican frontrunners, I decided that this primary is not one to take serious, and hence resorted to voting for the candidate who has the most integrity, rather than chances of winning. Ron Paul, I thought, was a progressive Republican. Among many other progressive issues he is staunchly opposed to how the Iraq war is being managed, he supports real social services for women as opposed to just abortion and he is Physician. He even says that he supports equality for gays, just like all the other big tent liberal Republicans who think that the way to be elected to higher office is by pandering to liberals. Turns out Ron Paul should be branded with a swastika instead of a Republican label.

Before announcing his candidacy for President, Mr. Paul. as a US Rep,  maliciously joked about gay men being "limp wristed." I don't find these kinds of comments particulary offensive. There are plenty of annoying and overly floamboyant people in the gay community. But there is more. In a newsletter to his consituents he pleaded for Republicans to rally to gether to "bring back the closet....because homosexuals and the rest of society were better off with social pressure that forced them to hide their identity." In another newsletter he stated that "Homosexuals, if admitted, should be put in a special category and not allowed in close physical contact with heterosexuals." I thought that concentration camps went out of style 50+ years ago. And while Bush the 1st was in office he referred to the white house as "The Pink House" because Bush signed anti-hate crime legislation and "invited homosexual lobbyists to the white house for the ceremony."

So you can imagine how even more confused I was to read about Congressman Paul being one of only two Republican Presidential candidates to show up at brunch co-sponsored by, who else, but the biggest gay GOP lobbyist group, the Log Cabin Republicans. And guess who was there representing Mitt Romney? If you guessed Kerry Healey, you guessed right. Healey, apparently incensed by the millions of dollars that the gay GOP group spent on ads attacking Romney in Iowa and New Hampshire, gave one of their members "the hand." After meeting Healey a man attending the event told her that he was there with the Log Cabin Republicans. When he asked her if she knew of the group she said "I sure do," and immediately exited the room. I'm not taking sides on this one, but I think it's really funny. I wonder who would win in a fight, Kerry Healey or a "limp wristed" member of the gay Log Cabin Club.

Back to Ron Paul. Apparently the Congressman from Texas also in on record villifying Israel, often evoking anti-semetic rhetoric. Great, this digs the knife in even further for me. And of course what is a biggot without the race factor. In 1989 he predicted that "Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities" because "mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white 'haves.'" Then he talked about "The Coming Race War," in which he stated that "If you live in a major city, and can leave, do so. If not, but you can have a rural retreat, for investment and refuge, buy it." Then later in the 1990's he released wnother newsletter, "Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo. This is only the first skirmish in the race war of the 1990s," and told readers to combat it by saying "I've urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming." Several years later when referring to the aftermath of a baseball game he again tried to evoke racial division by stating that "blacks poured into the streets of Chicago in celebration. How to celebrate? How else? They broke the windows of stores to loot." Then he claimed that liberals "want to keep white America from taking action against black crime and welfare," and concluded that "Jury verdicts, basketball games, and even music are enough to set off black rage, it seems."

There is a lesson to be learned here. Don't trust many of these liberal "big tent" Republicans. They may appear to be liberal, progressive, "gay friendly," racially sensitive, smart and so on. But underneath their liberal veils are biggoted hate mongers looking to advanced their political careers. So, for now, I am leaning towards Mike Huckabee. He may be a  slovenly gormandizer who has achieved abdolutely nothing politically, or even privately for that matter, but I think that's the best we can do. Mitt's finished. The conservative base doesn't want a drag queen for President (Guiliani). We don't want a President who will die in office (McCain). And we definitely don't want a racist and anti-semetic liberal who wants to send gays to concentation camps (Paul). So I think we are going to have to settle on Huckabee. That is unless we find him toe-tapping in some highway or airport restroom. Cross your fingers!

4 comments »

More Hardcore Republican Playguys

 Many status quo quasi-Republicans have chided me for being outspoken about the Massachusetts Republican Party and the Republican National Committee. They say that because of my decision to lambaste the Republican Party that I have doomed my chances of ever running for office again. Isn't that great? This is their way of attempting to usurp freedom of speech and expression. But I am convinced that coercion and scare tactics no longer work to the advantage of Republicans. Neither does reckless sexual behavior. And as long as Republican officials continue to whore themselves around, I not only will continue to distance myself, but will speak my mind without fear of retribution.

Most of you by now are pretty well aware of the endless saga of Republican gay sex stings leading up to the Larry Craig exposure, but you probably are unaware of the 10 or 15 other busts that have occurred since then. With so many Republican officials being indicted for gay rape, prostitution, public sex and everything else it's almost become normal. So normal that the myriad of Republican gay sex busts that have occurred since the Craig incident have been too high in number to create a single media buzz.

In the relatively short amount of time since the Craig scandal the leader of the National Federation of Young Republicans was busted for raping  teenage males while they were sleeping at a convention, a Wisconsin Republican leader was charged with enticing and touching a male delinquent youth who had run away from lock up, a Republican legislative leader from Florida was arrested for offering 20 dollars for sex in a highway bathroom, a Louisiana GOP Senate candidate was arrested for attempting to hire rent boys (male prostitutes), a Republican lawmaker from Washington was busted for engaging in unprotected sex with make prostitutes, a the head of a state GOP was arrested for molesting underage boys.........gosh, I can't even list them all. This doesn't even include the 15 or 20 other stings that occurred in the years preceding the Craig and Foley scandal.

Interestingly enough the media has downplayed most of these incidents, with the exception of the Larry Craig and Mark Foley sexcapade. Most of the information obtained for citing these examples actually came from international newspapers. That should be of no surprise. The American media is nearly saturated with super-liberal "there is no right and wrong" sympathizers of sexual deviancy. But the conservative media in other countries isn't, and they have made it known to the world that the American government, more specifically the Republican Party, is full of sexually compulsive lying hypocrites.

So for those rank-in-file Republicans who threaten me and others for speaking from our heart about the need for a serious overhaul in the Republican Party, keep kissing the ass of the Party of perverts like Larry Craig, Mark Foley, Glenn Murphy, Bob Allen, Jim West, Ed Schrock and she-males like LesbiAnn Coulter. See where it gets you! This new Republican Party has morphed into one big gay sex orgy from state capitols to Capitol Hill. Telling people that it's not appropriate to speak publicly about such unacceptable and vile behavior is like telling someone who witnesses rape to keep silent and be loyal to the rapist perpetrator. What good does that do? Too many Republican Party thugs have perpetrated countless sexual crimes against public moral, and unless we do something to change what is going on (sex crimes by Republican officials continue to be exposed roughly every 2-3 weeks) conservative will continue to leave the party, and yes, vote for Democrats.

 

 

 

21 comments »

We're Headed for Disaster!

Oh, no.  Oh, no! This is very bad. Iowa voters have selected the two candidates with virtually no foreign policy experience and absolutely zero management experience in the private sector. Bush, the worst President in the history on the USA, at least had managed large corporations and had measurable success as Governor of Texas. But these two birds, Obama and Huckabee, have achieved absolutely nothing in their political careers and have never worked in management for a company. And this is who we to manage the largest entity in the world? If you think Bush sucks, get ready for a new era.

Obama and Huckabee distinguished themselves using one or two divisive issues throughout their campaigns, but really, they are ideological twins. Both of them are career politicians. That means that the only real jobs that they have held have been in the public sector, mostly as politicians. So they have absolutely no idea of the stress, anxiety and accountability that is associated with owning or running a business. More importantly, they lack the appropriate management skills that are developed though commercial management. Neither of them possesses this extremely important qualification. So, how will they be able to manage the world's largest economy?

Secondly, Obama and Huckabee both love to victimize themselves, and others, and exploit it for personal and finacial gain. Obama wrote a book about his poor upbringing and being bi-racial, Huckabee wrote a book about losing over 100 lbs (much of which he has gained back, 3 or 4 times).  Both books were designed to emotionalize readers while lionizing the authors, and both biographies were "coincidentally"  released before announcing their candidacies. In these books inspirational words like "hope" and "faith" are used to  brand the candidates with a sensationalized image. How many time have you heard Obama use the word "hope?'' No other candidates have sensationalized voters by using victimhood as much as Huckabee and Obama, nor have any other candidates used such baseless and empty rhetoric.

Thirdly, Barack and Huckabee also like to do a lot of pretending and pandering. Barack, like Huckabee, pretends that he is a lot of things. At one event he talks to Muslims about his Muslim roots. At another event he takes on a gangster accent when taking to southern black Baptist churches and permits gay bashing. At another event he talks pretty and sophisticated with the wealthy United Church of Christ's congregation. At the gay lobbyist events and forums he fags himself up so much that you would think the was the biggest Queen in the race. But that title goes to Judy.....I mean Rudy Guiliani. Huckabee is just as slick. When talking to the unemployed Republican voters in Iowa he blames illegal immigrants for taking their jobs. But in Arkansas, a sanctuary state for illegals, he was revered by all the  top deputies at the illegal immigration militia's "aka" immigrant reform coalitions because he was so "well versed and knowledgeable of their issues." Though we may not be able to read through all the lies and fabrication, we do know for sure that both candidates are very willing to be lenient with immigration if it is to their own political advantage.

This election is the ultimate indicator of the mentality that has permeated the minds of an overwhelming number of Americans. We shouldn't elect our leaders based on how good they make us feel, as voting based on emotion is nothing more than irrational. Just 2 weeks ago the world's most educated country, South Korea, with the highest average IQ, test scores, number of scientists and engineers, and professional degrees just elected the most conservative President of all the industrialized nations. Korean President-elect Lee Myung-Bak is the perfect example of what a qualified candidates is. He grew up in extreme poverty during the Korean war, earned his way into Korea's top university, worked his way up the corporate ladder to become the CEO of Hyundai Construction and made Seoul one of the most affluent and ecnomically competitive cities in the world as mayor. The superior intellectual aptitude of South Korea's average voter enabled a victory for an economic champion.

So with the dumming down of American voters comes Presidents like Bush, and now even worse, Obama or Huckabee, while  other countries are electing more formidable and skilled leaders. What does this mean? Let's think about it. Americans are becoming fatter, increasingly more dependent on psychiatric prescriptions and services, lazier and with student test scores plummeting, dummer. So many of our fellow citizens have become so dumb, lazy, crazy and victimized that they vote based on emotion, whatever makes them feel good. Well, Obama and Huckabee sure are good at making the flakey, fat and over-medicated "victims" feel good. But it won't feel good in the years to come when we are economically leveled by smarter and more competitive countries. If Huckabee or Obama go on to win the next wave of primaries, kiss America as you know it goodbye and ring in the new era of China, South Korea, Japan, Russia, Qatar, UAE, and other rapidly growing economies. Both Obama and Huckabee have zero business or economic experience. The leaders of the aforementioned nations do. We are putting ourselves out of business.

46 comments »

Tested: Sarah Peake's Report Card

It's now been a year since Provincetown Representative Sarah Peake bought and smeared her way into the State Legislature. Below is what I believe is a fair and accurate grading of her first year in office.

Peake rymes with sneak. Some people think that Peake is pronounced "Pea-kee." Pea-kee rymes with sneaky. It was only a matter of months after buying and smearing her way into the State Legislature that Sarah Peake was engaging in good old boy politics.  Steven Desroches, a young reporter for the Cape Codder, carried out an in depth journalistic investigation of the Representatives behind-the-scenes deal-making and debauched maneuverings.  The article outlined how she rewarded people who donated to her campaign with high-paying jobs in government. Additionally, Sarah's ultra-wealthy campaign manager, Ann McGuire, was indicted for not paying over half a million dollars in taxes on her exlcusive PTown properties. Yeah, Ms. "Affordbale Housing" had someone who took affordable housing, condoized it into gentry housing,and made millions in profits at the expense of poor families as her campaign manager.  Because of incidents like these  Sarah get's a D in ethics.

Peake also rymes with week. Every year thousands of lesbians flock to Provincetown to celebrate an event called Womyn's Week, or "Dyke Week" as many of them call it, that is orchestrated by Sarah and her lover.  But these women aren't very womenly. In fact, it makes me wonders why they even call it "Womyn's Week." In reality I would estimate that well over 90 percent of the attendees are soft, lite or hardcore butches, at least at the chapstick lesbian level (with bull dyke being at the top). Straight girly girls RUN when they see the Womyn's Week woMEN. So when it comes to promoting REAL feminism and female empowerment, Sarah get's a D because she was successful in raising money from them for her campaign, unethical as it may be (exploiting feminism for political/financial gain). However, encouraging women to model themselves after men is not feminism, it's a cross mutation between lesbianism and transgenderism.

Peake also rymes with chic, and no, I won't even go there. But I will say that our current Representative,  who frequently dresses in men's clothing and sported a studly crew cut (probably to impress all the Women's Week  gals) prior to running for State Rep, seems like an anomoly in one of the most Republican regions of New England, the Lower Cape. In this subject Sarah earns a D, because she did wear lipstick once for a debate (there were many old ladies and some Republicans present), however miserable she looked. Actually, I am going to adjust that to a D-. I believe I speak for the majority of the  Cape Codder's subscribers in saying that waking up  to an oversized photo of Peake locking lips with her 56 year-old lesbian lover on the front pages of the paper  is, well,  naseating.  Gross man, GROSS!

Peake also rymes with squeak. During her campaign she talked endlessly about how she was going to solve the housing crises. In her newspaper columns, mailings to voters, radio ads, debates, interviews and speeches, she told everyone "housing is my linchpin issue." She spent about $150,00.00 telling people that housing was her linchpin issue.  For those of you who don't know what a linchpin is, it is a pin that binds a wheel to an axle for support and stability. Unfortunately for Sarah that wheel is becoming very squeeky, especially after yesterday's Cape Cod Times editorial in the Cape Cod Times titled "A Failing Grade." Under the leadership of Sarah Peake the number of affordable units created was 10 times lower than it should have been, with over a third of the units only  available to the elderly. What can I say, I warned voters in my radio ads about what happened when Sarah and her rich elitist gay friends promoted gentrification Provincetown by saying "Is this what you want coming to your town." I never expected that it would come so soon. I agree with the Cape Cod Times.  Sarah, along with her close friends and campaign worker machine people who work at the affordable housing programs on the Cape, get an F.  Of course there will be no affordable housing when the management of Cape housing organizations use their resources to promote their friends' political campaigns, just like when Sarah's best friend, and a manger at a Lower Cape housing organization, used her management status to smear opponents of Peake (including yours truly) to her subordinates and some of the organizations low-income tenants. You can't get lower than this, so Peake's grade remains at an F.

Peake also rymes with bleak, the only word I know that can describe the future of the "have not's" on Cape Cod, who have been ignored by a representative who serves only the agenda of her special-interest financers, literally leaving them out in the cold this winter.

10 comments »

Liberal Stormtroopers

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.

Martin Niemöller

More than half a century after they killed 6 million Jews, gypsies, disabled people and homosexuals, their number of victims has grown to nearly 50 million. During their dominance in the middle part of the 20th century they developed a way to create a master race by exterminating those who they believed were inferior. The vehicle by which this was administered was a socialistic campaign that, to many, seemed altruistic and progressive.  In reality it was merely a stage in a liberal campaign to wreak terror on the weak and oppressed.

In 1973 , Sarah Weddington, a young ambitious Texan fresh out of law school, with the help of those with vested interests in the abortion industry, conned a young and impoverished  pregnant mother into being the plaintiff in a law suit that was guaranteed to be expedited to the Supreme court. The issue at hand was whether or not it was in violation of the US constitution for the young woman, who used the alias Jane Roe, to terminate her pregancy.

Where else, but in Texas, would a group of white elites seek to legalize a system that acted as population control for blacks, hispanics and poor families by scamming a downtrodden pregnant woman . After winning the case that made abortion legal in all 50 states, Weddington and her accomplices told the sea of reporters that this was a step in the right direction for women's rights. Their framing it as a "women's rights" issue  sugarcoated the truth behind their blood thirsty judicial agenda, eugenics (killing off racial minorities), and created a multi-billion dollar industry off of the decades of increased promiscuity and high demand for abortions that followed. Weddington immediately capitalized on her success and became a Democratic politician.

The woman who set the precedent for Weddington and her agenda is lionized by today's feminists and liberals. Her name is Margaret Sanger, and she hated poor people, especially blacks and other minorities. She hated them so much that she founded the American Birth Control League, which has since been re-named to Planned Parenthood, an organizations who's official mission statement outlined a need to keep blacks, hispanics and poor women from reproducing.

 As a frequent writer for popular socialist publications, Sanger relentlessly delivered bombastic harangues, often to racist and anti-Jew audiences, about the need to annihilate those who she alleged were genetically inferior. "No more black babies," was a key theme in her racial supremacy through abortion campaign that she emphasized repeatedly in many of her oratories. So when she made frequent speeches to groups like the Women's Auxilary of the Ku Klux Klan and spoke to the Nazi's in Germany, she was very, very well-recieved. They accepted her doctrine of race hygeine, a concept that she developed with the help of Charles Darwin (natural selection theory) Francis Galton (Eugenics theory) and other instruments aimed at eradicating blacks and those who weren't in the majority, as truth.

Fast forward to the early 1990's. A young 26 year old Tammy Bruce becomes the youngest person ever elected to the largest chapter of the National Organization of Women, an extremely influential  abortion rights  organization. Following her stint as the President of NOW, Bruce bursted into the spotlight with three  consecutive New York Times bestsellers and weekly appearances on FOX NEWS conservative talk shows. She also hosts the Tammy Bruce Show, which is syndicated in the reddest of the conservative radio markets. What makes bruce so popular is her uniqueness. She is militantly pro-abortion, lesbian, anti-Arab, anti-immigrants and during the OJ Simpson trial when she was the President of NOW, she was even called a racist by many in the media and within the black community. Following the Ann Coulter's "faggot" comment, Bruce was quick to capitalize on Coulter's demise and bump her out of the spotlight. She is now FOX's #1 female commentator. Though a Democrat, she is loved by the "big tent" Republicans because she is lesbian, pro-abortion, anti-arabs, anti-immigrant, etc and defines herself as a "classic liberal."

In case you haven't spent years of academics reasearch on this topic, I am referring to liberals. While most rank-in-file liberals are unconscious of the fact that they are agents of a demonic and blood-thristy agenda, those sociaist like Margaret Sanger and Sarah Weddington who inject  lies into the minds of lost souls, it is they who are agents of the devil. As mentioned in Proverbs 1:7, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction." And fools are easily decieved by the "looks good, feels good," doctrine of liberal stormtroopers like those previously mentioned.

But underneath the lies and deceptions of the liberals is truth, and I guarantee you, it is there. Rewind back to Weddington's 1972 landmark Roe V. Wade case. Remember that low-income woman, Jane Roe, who Weddington and the liberal abortionists used as their plaintiff? In recent years she confessed to making a deal with Weddington and the other liberals who exploited her pregancy for their own evil ambitions. Everything she had said under the auspices of Weddington and the liberals was a lie. He real name is Norma McCorvey and she has since joined a black church in the south, and in doing so, has discovered the truth, which for years, was hidden under layers of alluring liberal lies.

When it comes to liberal stormtroopers, Democrat and Republican are terms that no longer matter. There are good Democrats and their are liberal Democrats. There are good Republicans, and their are "inclusive" and "big tent" Republicans. Just like the nazi stormtroopers where exiled from German rule, so should those liberal stormtroopers, who, like the gestapo, have infiltrated their way into the highest ranks of our government. Contrary to the liberal belief that the masses are too "genetically and intellectually inferior" to have voting power (like on gay marriage), we are a Democracy, and I can only hope that in days to come there will be a true Democratic revolution.

38 comments »

Fat Lazy Americans, Hard-working Christian Illegals

How many times have we heard the Republican Presidential candidates scapegoat undocumented workers for their own selfish political gain? Enough. And enough IS enough. When watching clips from candidate town hall meetings and debates you are likely to see undereducated rednecks and young college graduates asking the candidates questions like "What will you do to stop the illegal immigrant terrorists," (as if they go hand in hand) "What is your plan to send all 13 million illegals back to where they came from," etc, etc. What do they both have in common? Joblessness.

If you visit some of the towns in our agrarian states you might notice  lines of ethnic minorities standing on street corners. They are called day laborers, and they stand outside, often in freezing weather, hoping that a local farm or family business is in need of their temporary labor. For them, being offered the chance to work hard all day in the outdoors to earn 5 or 6 dollars per hour is seen as a golden opportunity. At the end of the day they are able to see the tangible  fruits of their labor and productivity.  With a sense of temporary relief they are  able to feed themselves and their families.

If you visit the homes of many families in the USA these days, it is very common to see 20-something year old's living at home, often  unemployed or underemployed.  Many of them have collge degrees, but are still unable to find work that is suitable to their expectations.  So, rather than being smart enough to work toward getting a good job, they blame their loser status on illegal immigrants. Their parents are just as bad. Not wanting to accept their inferior parenting skills, they direct the blame at illegal immigrants for their children not being able to find work after college.

Our Presidential candidates are more than willing to legitimize this myth as a way of giving Americans a false sense of hope. If you are an unemployed reject or the parent of one, hearing a politician tell you that it's not your fault can make you feel very good and even victimized. But these are not traditional American values, and they certainly are not the qualities of a leader. A real leader would be a gadfly and reinforce a stronger work ethic into the minds of the American people.

Who do these millionaire gentry politicians think they are that they can just use the misfortunes of impoverished people to galvanize American citizens into voting for them? While I acknowledge that illegal immigration has destroyed our public school systems and has dried up a lot of public welfare funds that are needed for many of our own struggling families, I do have a lot more respect for "illegals" than I do for some of the lazy fat asses that actually are citizens of this country. In fact, I want hard-working people to be citizens of this country, more so than those who think they are too good for hard work.

Now, with record numbers of both legal and  illegal immigrants returning to their countries of origin, it seems almost inappropriate for politicians to hype those who are easily fooled. With poor student test scores and low productivity, the last thing this country needs are advantageous politicians further dumbing down Americans and demonizing those who are willing to actually work hard.

So the next time you see an ethnic minority who "talks funny," try to appreciate her drive to succeed, her ability to labor under brutal conditions and her appreciation for the opportunity to work hard that has been shunned and foolishly undervalued by today's young generation of American citizens.  What gives these politicians who were born with silver spoons in their mouthes the right to vilify these workers? Then again, if you have never labored a day in your life and experienced the fear of not being able to feed your baby, such ignorance is understandable.

Finally, and most importantly, a high percentage of immigrant workers are family oriented and attend church regularly. Ask McCain, Guiliani, Thompson and the others when the last time was that they attended a church service. Then ask them if they know of any bibles scriptures that relate to their everyday struggles, another reason why I have more respect for illegals than I do for our scapegoating politicians.

Illegal immigration in the USA is a problem. However, contrary to the false doctrine that is spewed out of the mouth of politicians, unemployable college grads and rednecks, the problem isn't the illegal immigrants as human beings.  They are mostly residents of other countries who, prior to coming to America, lacked the education to understand concepts like  "legal immigration," and "illegal immigration." But, unlike the plethora of people who consider themselves educated here in America, they do understand the concept of work. And it is work that made America what it is, or was: a prosperous country full of opportunity. Now, we are a country that is breeding a population of failures, and thanks to the liberals, we victimize ourselves and blame others for our misfortune. This self-destructing of America is the fault of nobody but ourselves, and with the immigrants fleeing our country in droves, it not only confirms our decline, but deprives us of the hard work and values that made America what it once was.

 

28 comments »