Partly Cloudy 35°F Partly Cloudy [Forecast] ADVISORY! :: Thursday, January 8th, 2009
Vacation Info Wedding Info NEW! Kids & Parents

Boston Cod

Where oysters speak only to lobsters and lobsters speak only to cod!
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Cape Cod Homes & Land
Your online and print source for Cape-wide homes for sale and year-round rentals. Browse and search our listings online or order our free magazine. Distributed throughout the Cape. (Barnstable)
The Real Estate Company
For more than 25 years we have been one of the premier agencies on the Cape. Our Agents pride themselves in professional and personalized service. We are the agency with the knowledge of Cape Cod and technology that reaches the world. (Orleans)

Extinction Of The Middle Class

By Greg O’Brien, Codfish Press

Deep impact, as they say in the movies! Millions of years ago, scientists suspect, a giant meteor hit the earth, knocking the planet off its axis and wiping out much of life (as was known then). With far less hype, but perhaps with equal impact, historians in the future might record that the “trickle down theory” of the Reagan Administration—a policy of lowering taxes on high incomes and business activity—walloped the planet more than two decades ago and slowly brought about the extinction of the middle class. In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan initiated a new era of American economics by axing the top tax bracket on the theory that what’s good for business and the rich is good for the country. Or as Gordon Gekko, the Teldar Paper tycoon in “Wall Street” would put it: “Greed is right. Greed Works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.”

David Stockman, then Reagan’s budget director and once the essence of the evolutionary spirit (who happened to be indicted Monday on unrelated fraud charges), later termed trickle down economics “a Trojan Horse.” Stockman conceded that “when one stripped away the new rhetoric emphasizing across-the-board cuts, the supply-side theory was really new clothes for the unpopular doctrine of the old Republican orthodoxy.” And former House Speaker Jim Wright, a Democrat, asserted at the time that tax increases fell instead on low and middle-income individuals in the form of “user fees” and “revenue-enhancers.”

Earlier this month, economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman noted in a speech posted on the web that “the American economy went from having the world’s most dynamic middle class to being on the verge of a rich-poor state in only 30 years.” Krugman, reflecting on the widening gap in the U.S. between the rich and poor, and predicting the gap would expand, wrote several years ago in a New York Times Magazine piece, “Even my liberal friends tell me not to worry, that our system has great resilience, that the center will hold. I hope they’re right, but they may be looking in the rearview mirror. Our optimism about America, our belief that in the end our nation always finds its way, comes from a past—a past in which we were a middle-class society. But that was another country.”

Krugman’s friends were wrong. The breach between the rich and poor in New England, for example, has now grown at a faster pace than any region in the country, according to a newly released University of New Hampshire study, presaging similar trends in the Northeast and beyond with the loss of manufacturing jobs and the displacement of these jobs over seas. “The changes,” the report states,” are not simply the ‘rich getting richer,’ rather they reflect the hollowing out of the middle caused by significant changes in the nation’s economy.”

Wrote Krugman almost five years ago, “You might think that 1987, the year Tom Wolfe published his novel “The Bonfire of the Vanities” and Oliver Stone released his movie “Wall Street,” marked the high tide of America’s new money culture, But in 1987 the top 0.01 percent earned only about 40 percent of what they do today, and top executives less than a fifth as much. The America of “Wall Street” and “The Bonfires of the Vanities” was positively egalitarian compared with the country we live in today.”

Corporate profits and executive salaries in 2007 have hit new nosebleed highs, with CEO’s earning the equivalent of the gross national product of some third world nations. The “trickle down” seems to have slowed to a dribble at best; more likely the faucet has been shut off. 

And why not? “Greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge—has marked the upward surge of mankind,” as the spruce Gekko preached.

Looks like most of us won’t be making the trip. The middle class—an apparent dinosaur of society with its teachers, assembly line workers, fire fighters, police, nurses and the like—is fast on its way to extinction, and the lower class in slipping deeper into the abyss. This is one deep impact that could and should be avoided. Without a firm backbone, our society is spineless.
 

54 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.

03/27/07 @ 4:12 pm
Opinionator [Member] writes:
These truths you discuss are why I vote Democrat, not Republican. Somehow I think the secrecy about how much people earn feeds into this abyss between haves and have nots. “What do you make?” is not a question you ask in polite society. If we make too little we are embarrassed and want to keep it a secret. If we make too much we are a little ashamed of ourselves. We also like to promote the image that we have material wealth because we earned it, because we are sharp and made some good decisions. There is irony and miscues in all this because most of us don’t mind driving around in $50,000 cars and living in million dollar houses.
03/27/07 @ 7:59 pm
capemom [Member] writes:
I disagree. People are not poor because other people are rich. The fact that a CEO gets paid $100 million has nothing to do with the ghetto or the homeless.

I think you need to define what middle class means.

I also think the big gap between the two in New England is due to: property values and the aging of the population. The old are rich, the young are poor by comparison.

But don't forget that millions of people come to this country to be poor, because being poor in America is better than being poor in Colombia.

What's the fastest-growing business on Cape Cod? Health care. So go to CCCC's and become a nurse, or a physical therapist.

Retrain. Adapt. So what if there aren't as many assembly line jobs? Would you want to work on one?

Your idyllic memory of overpaid union factory jobs, stay-at-home moms and apple pie is over. It had to be; it was unsustainable.

Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are going to bring back the Irish nirvana that Cod and Opinionator bemoan.
03/27/07 @ 10:38 pm
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Opinionator,

Agree. Reality is that it doesn't always take high intelligence to make a lot of money. It just has to be a passion.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/27/07 @ 10:51 pm
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Capemom,

Not sure where you are going with this. Perhaps I missed your point. Entirely possible that I did.

Middle class, as you note, is an elusive definition. But the fact is that we are headed to a two-class society, the rich and the poor. I'm not talking about a dead end street called Cape Cod; my concern is more global.

Any way you measure it, the middle of the income stream, once the majority in many countries worldwide, is fast slipping away.

That's undeniable, and that's a real problem.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/28/07 @ 12:15 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
I'm with you on this, capemom. The Reagan tax cut lamented by O'B was preceded by another 20 years earlier - initiated by JFK. Same thing happened after both - an economic boom.

"Walloped the planet more than two decades ago"? If by that he means policies that led to domestic prosperity and the demise of Soviet communism, perhaps we should pursue "wallop" policies more often.

The middle class is hardly extinct, as anyone struggling to find parking at the mall on any given weekend can attest. As extinctions go, it's among the most crowded in history.
03/28/07 @ 7:49 am
capemom [Member] writes:
It is true that there are more super-rich now than ever. Not just in America, but globally.

But in this country, what is now considered upper middle class used to be considered rich. What is now considered poor used to be considered lower middle class.

This is not the Depression, with millions unemployed, with no food stamps, no WIC, no ADC, no unemployment insurance, no Medicare or Medicaid, no worker's comp, no social security.

Nowadays, the truly poor are marginalized people such as illegal aliens (although most are working 3 jobs and doing quite alright) or the homeless who most often have addiction problems.

It is true that there are homeless families and this is a shame. But there really aren't that many of them as a percentage of the population.

The fact is, we are a nation that is fat and happy. 2/3 of our population is overweight, 17 pets die from poisoned food and it's a national scandal, the poor from other countries come here to be poor, poeple are living to be 104. What's the problem?
03/28/07 @ 8:53 am
Margot [Member] writes:
The top 1% of wage earners pay 38% of the taxes in the US. Is it fair to have a tax cut and exclude them? People with the bottom fifth of income saw their tax rate drop to 5.2% from 6.7%. Yet because lower and many middle-income families have been paying very little federal income tax in the first place, those in that bottom fifth of earnings received an average tax cut of only $250.

So? They're not paying any taxes!

The liberal stance is always to punish the rich. I'm not wealthy, but I certainly believe in my potential to acheive any income level I desire. The literacy rate in this country is very high--the tools to succeed are there for everyone. We guarantee an education to EVERYONE for 13 years. Is it perfect? No. But our system has been perfect enough to catapult people out of poverty for two hundred years.

Statistics show most people in the US are doing better than their parents did.
Our standard of living is at an all time high.

Communism doesn't work. Education, passion and drive are still the standard bearers.
03/28/07 @ 9:20 am
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Jack,
You should get across the bridge more.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/28/07 @ 10:02 am
Matt [Member] writes:
The rich really are paying much less in taxes and have access to lawyers and tax consultants that show them how not to pay any taxes. By rich I mean millionaires and up. Right now it is more likely for a people living in poverty to get an IRS audit than it is for a multi-millionaire or a mulinational corporation. Right here in Massachusetts there are 1,100 corporations that each gross over 100 million dollars annually and pay the minimum tax of $456 according to our own Department of Revenue. Right here on Cape Cod I see a constant stream of people that get run over by the system and don't have the income to recover. Predatory mortgages, illnesses and hugh health bills or the cost of health insurance. All attributable to bad luck or a few bad decisions. 60% of people who work on Cape Cod work in retail trade or service industries where the average wage is $23,000 a year according to census data. Then look at the cities and the youths who have no family as we know it, education or hope.

The reason for this shift is complex. See next comment.
03/28/07 @ 10:11 am
Margot [Member] writes:
O'B: Can you please respond to the following:

The bottom 80% of wage earners pay just 22% of the federal income tax burden. Now, how in the world can anybody with a brain come forth and say, "I am against tax cuts for the rich. I'm only going to have a tax cut for the middle class." If you give a tax cut to people in the bottom 20%, you're not going to stimulate the economy,. They're not paying any taxes!

The only country where a well-publicized UN Report found the poor actually getting poorer is Nigeria. That nation's economy has shrunk and its poverty has skyrocketed. Was this due to too much laizez-faire capitalism? No! The problem is corruption and too little freedom. Even the limited amount of capitalism in China is trickling down to the people.

Your stance is that capitalism leads to corruption and that successful people are greedy. This country features the opportunity for ordinary, everyday people to do extraordinary things. And I'm telling you, it happens every day and if it didn't, the country wouldn't be what it is.
03/28/07 @ 10:20 am
Matt [Member] writes:
People should read "Perfectly Legal" by David Cay Johnston to find out how the people who have access to our U.S. legislators, have been able to distort the tax system. The reason they have access is because they can raise a lot of money for campaigns that all legislators must weather. The result is a tax system that no longer favors the poor and middle class but favors the rich.

Someone above mentioned that the rich pay 38% of the taxes and the poor don't pay enough to get much of a break. That's income tax which is still a progressive tax in US although much less so than it was before Reagan's era. What most of us neglect to mention is the Social Security tax. This is a flat tax that kills the poor and middle class. The tax disappears for incomes over $89,000 leaving most of the income of the super rich untaxed.

There are numerous studies that bear out the fact that the rich are getting richer at the expense of the middle and lower classes.

Read Johnston to find out how the alternative minimum tax is crippling the middle class.
03/28/07 @ 10:37 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
O'B is a frequent critic of what he considers soundbites, yet resorts to one without hesitation when a person who disagrees with him undermines his claims.

Those with genuine disdain for soundbite analysis would do well to read Margot's comments here.
03/28/07 @ 10:43 am
Matt [Member] writes:
During a time of war why should anyone get a tax cut? We are going to borrow a trillion dollars to pay for this war before its over and it is our children who will pay for it. Never in history have we had both a war and tax cuts at the same time.

Jack's comment about Kennedy refers to a time when the highest bracket paid well over 50% of their income in taxes to help pay for the World War II and Korea. It was still very hight after Kennedy's cut.

I think the real issue is the impact on the shrinking middle class. Just the fact that we need two people working in a family to maintain what our parents did with on wage earner is a detriment to society and the middle class.

How many kids have been raised in absentia of an adult compared to the boomer generation. And there is no longer an affordable college education for low to moderate income kids that qualify academicaly but don't have the money or family resources to go.
03/28/07 @ 10:45 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
I think- and I could be wrong- that OB is referring more to a concentration of wealth issue than a salary tax rate issue. He's looking to hammer the people who hold 60% of US wealth, not the ones who are already paying 38% of the taxes... even if they are the same people. He's also seeking to take the burden of paying 35%(making this number up) of US operating costs off the people who only hold 10% of the wealth (and can thus afford it least).

If that's not what OB meant... never mind.
03/28/07 @ 10:50 am
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Jack Coleman,

Fair criticism, Jack! I should have been more thoughtful. I was running off to handle a pressing family matter.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/28/07 @ 10:56 am
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Monponsett,
You're on target in many ways.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/28/07 @ 11:19 am
Margot [Member] writes:
O'B-

I take offense to that. Better to come to the table armed with facts--published and provable facts, than to throw blame around without any attempt to back up your claims.

I believe that we live in a country where each persom has access to the tools to acheive amazing things, where hard work, education, creativity and imagination are still the back bones of success. Rather than addressing that-and many of the other facts that I put forth in my threads--you choose to be derogatory. But I'm hardly surprised. It's hard to contest reality.

Your liberal leanings--that the rich are to blame for society's ills-have begun to wear thin on the American public.

My beliefs aren't soundbites, sir. They come from facing my own adversity in life and a willingness to find solutions to my own problems rather than looking to other people (or the Government) to solve them for me. I believe in the power of each person to do the same. If that's a spiffy sound bite, well, I'll take that as a compliment, then.
03/28/07 @ 11:38 am
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Margot,
I never said your beliefs were soundbytes, and haven't, in fact, responded yet to your earlier posts. I'm attending to a family matter at the moment, as noted above. Perhaps you're referring to a post from someone else on this.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/28/07 @ 4:50 pm
bittersweet [Member] writes:
Matt is right, and here's a fact: when I check my paycheck, the Social Security tax is more than the state and federal income tax COMBINED. I'm pretty sure that people from 0-$49,000 pay only the SS tax, from $49,000-$90,000 pay all three, and $90,000 and up pay the state and federal taxes only. So, you figure it out...who's getting screwed? Not the wealthy,who pay less a percentage of their incomes than everyone else! Definately the middle,who pay all three, and also the poor, as the SS tax is higher than the state and federal taxes combined. And let's not forget all those un-American corporations who set up shop over-seas and pay no taxes at all! While also making money hand over fist by selling us their products! The Robber Barons are alive and well in America, and I think it stinks! And it does affect everybody else. Someone has to make up for those taxes that the wealthy aren't paying!
03/28/07 @ 7:01 pm
capemom [Member] writes:
Taxing the rich more and more will lead to a disincentive to create wealth, which leads to fewer jobs being created, which leads to less income to be taxed.

What would our gevernment do with more tax revenue anyway? Create an efficiently run, universal health care system? No. It would probably blow more money on the Iraq quagmire.

The problem isn't that the rich aren't paying their share, it's that the goverment doesn't spend the money it has efficiently.
03/28/07 @ 8:17 pm
Tim [Member] writes:
You really banged the gong on this one, O'B...you have us all talking!

In his "The Triumph of Politics," David Stockman wrote that he originally had the naive thought that the Reagan Revolution would take off as the Federal budget deficits fade away. He's 1 for 2 from the three-point arc on that one. And therein lies the demise of the middle class. Someone has to pay for the attitude of government greed. Furthermore, who is the government? I think we all know the answer.

Tim
03/28/07 @ 9:47 pm
barbaradurkin [Member] writes:
Capemom, in answer to your question,

"What would our government do with more tax revenue anyway?

Give it to Jim Gordon, GE and the American Wind Energy Association.

Cape Wind would benefit by available tax sheltering, too.
03/28/07 @ 10:21 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
No, barbaradurkin, the government would be more likely to waste it.

Tim, did you happen to notice that the federal deficit has plunged over the last few years? This after three major tax cuts since Bush became president, and in the wake of 9/11, and while we are fighting two wars abroad and defending the homeland from Islamic fanatics. You'd be hearing plenty about the incredible shrinking deficit if the president's last name was Clinton or Obama.

Keep commenting, Margot, your intelligence and insights are refreshing.
03/28/07 @ 11:07 pm
barbaradurkin [Member] writes:
Jack, Cape Wind would be a waste of our tax dollars, ecosystem, wildlife, and the precious resource of Nantucket Sound.

I agree with your observation about Margot's refreshing insights and intelligence. As a member of a family who gives a greater percentage of our income to the government than we are allowed to retain, I welcome Margot's continued participation.
03/29/07 @ 12:32 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
Bush's deficit cut is a guy who lost $5000 at the track rejoicing because he found a quarter on the ground when he was walking home.

Even a revenue stream will bounce a little bit when dropped from the Great Depression heights George bungled a to in his first term.
03/29/07 @ 12:33 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
...bungled a surplus*
03/29/07 @ 6:26 am
Tim [Member] writes:
Good morning, Jack:

I respectfully disagree, and I'm drawing from statistics on the national debt as a percentage of gross domestic product as offered by whitehouse.gov. At the end of Clinton's second term. national debt was 50 percnet of GDP. Presently, national debt as a percentage of GDP is 68 percent. And, as a point of information, since WWII the only times this number increased were during the Reagan-Bush 41-Bush 43 years.

Tim
03/29/07 @ 8:52 am
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Tim,
You're on point. And yes, the column has "banged the gong," as you note. It's a subject worthy of great debate, regardless of your point of view on it. One thing is clear: most comprehend the significance of the middle class, as we all should.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/29/07 @ 1:28 pm
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Matt/Tim:

FYI: NYT reports today that the income gap is widening. "Income inequality grew significantly in 2005, with the top 1 percent of Americans — those with incomes that year of more than $348,000 — receiving their largest share of national income since 1928, analysis of newly released tax data shows," the story, available on line, reports.

"The new data also shows that the top 300,000 Americans collectively enjoyed almost as much income as the bottom 150 million Americans. Per person, the top group received 440 times as much as the average person in the bottom half earned, nearly doubling the gap from 1980."

For what it's worth...

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/30/07 @ 1:37 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Thanks, O'B, fair enough.

Monponsett, in lieu of absurd analogies you prefer to empirical fact, I'll rely on the latter - according to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal deficit for the current fiscal year will fall to $172 billion from a peak of $412 billion three years ago. This in the wake of 9/11 - and Katrina - while fighting two wars abroad and protecting us at home from a threat that Bush's critics allege doesn't exist. And these are just the dollar amounts - as a percentage of GDP, the deficit has shrunk even more. Hence, the puzzling dearth of mainstream media coverage. Were this happening under President Clinton or Obama, you'd be leading the chorus of praise. Alas, it's happening with the Anti-Christ at the helm.
03/30/07 @ 1:38 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
As for federal debt, Tim, agreed, more needs to be done. Since most of the debt is tied to entitlement spending, where do you suggest we start - reducing Social Security benefits or raising the payroll tax? How about doing away with that exorbitantly expensive - and bipartisan - Medicare prescription drug benefit? Sounds good to me.
03/30/07 @ 2:26 pm
Codfish Press [Member] writes:
Jack,
I know we don't always agree, but I do appreciate your articulate passion, knowledge and wit. You have a good touch.

O'B.
Codfish Press
03/30/07 @ 10:29 pm
Monponsett [Member] writes:
If you want to credit a man for halving the debt he created, knock yourself out. I wish I was your accountant.

To turn your point back at you, I can imagine that you'd be singing a whole different tune if some dimwit Demo prez butchered a surplus that a GOP 2 termer left him/her... especially if the GOP had to build that surplus out of the debt the dimwit's father left after his war-filled term.

If Bush can a turn a surplus out of this, I'd be happy to praise him. However, I doubt that even you think he can do that.

If my facts about Bush creating a deficit from a surplus are wrong, correct me. If they aren't, don't try that GOP spin bullshi* on me. Even my children see through it.
03/30/07 @ 10:29 pm
Monponsett [Member] writes:
Set the clock now, and wait for Jack to question my patriotism.
03/31/07 @ 7:55 am
Tim [Member] writes:
Jack, I frankly don't know where I'd cut to balance the behemoth. I'm such a softy. However, in PJ O'Rourke's "Parliament of Whores," he tell us how he'd do it. I know he writes satire, but with regard to his budget analysis, I think he's serious about most of it.

Thank you for allowing me to be part of this "brawl."

Tim
03/31/07 @ 7:59 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
PJO, although I love some of his work, is a lot like the Joe Perry of satire... once he calmed down, he lost his fastball. "Peace Kills" was unreadable.
03/31/07 @ 8:00 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
"This is not a book to be tossed aside lightly... it should be thrown with great force."
03/31/07 @ 10:01 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
On that we can agree, O'B, thanks ;)

" ... for halving the debt he created .." Monponsett? Wow, you really are unhinged when it comes to Bush. Think any of the 300-million rest of us played a role in building up the debt, to say nothing of the destructive miscreants in al-Qaeda?

Given your odd and overcompensatory inclination to boast of your vast wealth, how about doing your part to reduce the debt by repaying the government the amount you've received from the expanded child tax credit, which has risen several hundred dollars annually under Bush. The benefit to you must be in the thousands by now.

Consider it your chance to demonstrate something, anything, in the way of noblesse oblige, mon petite ami.
03/31/07 @ 10:21 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Same here, Tim, not sure where I'd cut. "Parliament of Whores" was a great book but Monponsett could be right about O'Rourke. It occurred to me after reading her comment that I haven't read him nearly as much recently as I used to.
03/31/07 @ 10:26 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
Sure. I'll pay back the child credit after the oil companies pay back the stash they made off 9-11. Sound fair?

Call me crazy all you want, Jack... if it makes you feel better about not being able to defend Bush's record with the budget. You look a little crazy yourself. You may one day be the last American left praising that clown after two failed wars and the ravishing of our economy.

Think any of us 300 million had a role in building up the surplus Bush squandered? For the sake of your cute children, I hope your wife handles the Coleman family finances.
03/31/07 @ 10:29 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
"Holidays In Hell" = great book.

"Give War A Chance" = OK

"The CEO Of The Sofa" = Insipid
03/31/07 @ 10:35 am
Monponsett [Member] writes:
Keep in mind when I goof on PJ... I'm still waiting for the second not-mine comment in my Idol entry. PJ can lugh at me all the way to the bank.
03/31/07 @ 10:45 am
Buzz [Member] writes:
Try this one: "In Defense of Elitism" by Henry
03/31/07 @ 11:25 am
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
For those unfamiliar with Monpospeak, allow me to translate - no, she's not willing to do her part to help reduce a national debt she so readily condemns, and one she so readily benefits from. This from a person who has prospered during the Bush years but is unwilling to pay more in taxes, a trait she condemns when shown by others.

Not too late, Monponsett, couple of weeks to go before April 15. With two children, the child tax credit is worth $2,000 to you this year; with three it comes to $3,000. Here's your chance to demonstrate character rather than knee-jerk disparagement. Unless you'd rather continue pointing the finger at convenient boogeymen like Big Oil, Cheney, black helicopters, etc.

Warning - making a sacrifice like this may require tapering off the wine and bong hits, at least temporarily. Do hope you were sitting down for that.
03/31/07 @ 12:41 pm
Monponsett [Member] writes:
I made my money in the very end of the Clinton years,/beginning of Bush II... though I've accrued interest during Chimp Boy's reign of error. I was at my poorest during the end of Bush I/beginning of Clinton.

I'd be a hypocrite if I was bitching about concentration of wealth. While I'm not rich/rich, I've concentrated quite a bit in my hands.

Realistically... I wouldn't be opposed to paying a much higher tax rate because I'm wealthier than 99% of my countrymen, even those risking their ass in Iraq. Doing so would make me a hypocrite of the lowest sort.

Let's see Romney jump up at the GOP Convention espousing a tax-the-rich strategy. Rove'll probably dig up those four other wives Mitt is stashing.

Am I going to write a check to Bush II, as Jack seems to be asking? May as well pound holes into the bottom of a leaking ship, to let the water drain out.
03/31/07 @ 1:12 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
It wouldn't be writing a check to Bush II, Monponsett, as you claim I'm suggesting, which I'm not. It would be you, someone "wealthier than 99 percent" of your countrymen, showing a willingness to forgo a tax credit initiated by Bush and one that you've benefitted from to the tune of thousands of dollars. This would, however, entail likely conflict between your avowed and actual beliefs, and for nothing more than that vague abstraction, the common good.

You can even stipulate on your tax return, if you were inclined to make this marginal sacrifice, that the extra amount you're willing to pay goes directly toward reducing the national debt. Many hundreds of similarly inclined liberals do this every year in our vast nation.

Given your keen suspicion of all things Dubya, you may want to send Monopoly money - that'll fool him!
03/31/07 @ 2:19 pm
Monponsett [Member] writes:
Unless I have to work some judo to get the credit, I'm probably already forgoeing it.. I let my sister do my taxes, and she's very, very blonde.

Now get out of here, for God's Sake!! King Kong Bundy has been spotted in Sandwich!
03/31/07 @ 4:03 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Whoever the hell that is. And I just spotted someone's uncle.
03/31/07 @ 4:06 pm
bittersweet [Member] writes:
Did it ever occur to our fearless leaders that maybe for once, they could cut from the top instead of always always always cutting from the bottom? As Reaguns said back when he "privatized" everything for the benefit of his bizness buds: "We're cutting their allowance" That was his attitude towards his fellow Americans....oh sorry, not his Americans,the riff-raff I mean. Lucky for him that when he got Altzheimer's disease, he got top care compliments of all of us. Many of his poorer brothers ended up homeless in the streets thanks to him.So, how about taking back the tax cuts for the top 1%? And how about making corporations pay their fair share? And how about ending 0ff-shore banking for the elite few? (Saudi Arabia, for crying out loud! Don't they sponsor terrorism??) And the no-bid highway robbery that is going on in Iraq? And the myriad other ways that money gets allotted to the top. Leave the bottom earners/destitute/dis-abled alone for a while. People always say this is a Judeo-Christian nation...well, prove it!
03/31/07 @ 4:13 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Close your eyes, breathe deeply and keep thinking of the happy place, bittersweet
03/31/07 @ 5:17 pm
bittersweet [Member] writes:
This is my happy place. My beautiful country. And it should be that way for everybody. I mean, isn't there enough to go around? Why lionize greed?
03/31/07 @ 11:16 pm
Ted from Hyannis Port [Member] writes:
"U can't touch my riches/// even if you had MC Hammer and those .357 witches."
04/01/07 @ 12:02 am
Carl B. Freeman [Member] writes:
This latest white house has shown, more than any in my lifetime, that money helps to write the laws to favor those with money. Every time that happens, the people who do the living, working, & dying in our communities are shorted a little bit more.

As the wealth concentrates into the upper 1% more & more we slide deeper into plantation working condtions.

Of course the highly skilled worker has a place, but the security of higher education is far less than it has been.

We live in a world where we can only afford items made in china, burn coal, and require 2 adults in a household to afford to raise a child.

As the common man goes, so goes the world!

Index the minimum wage to the cost of living at least!
04/01/07 @ 12:00 pm
Jack Coleman [Member] writes:
Mine too, bittersweet. Which is a big reason I don't appreciate confiscatory tax schemes veiled in the disingenuous guise of fairness. Think back to the last gubernatorial campaign. The Democratic candidate wasn't disagreeing with the Republican nominee over whether to cut taxes; he was disagreeing on which taxes to cut. Patrick's former boss, Bill Clinton, proclaimed nearly 10 years ago in a State of the Union address that "the era of big government is over," sounding remarkably like his two Republican predecessors.

Prosperity isn't achieved by redistributing wealth from those who created it to those not inclined to do so. Is government responsible to those who can't care for themselves? You bet. Should it also punish initiative? Absolutely not. Can it accomplish both? Yes, when those on both sides of the aisle are willing to eschew dogma.
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Seacoast Imaging
Providing the highest quality images available. Experienced technologists, on-site radiologist for MD consultations. Same day scheduling/reports within 48 hrs. Non-invasive & completely safe! Transportation provided & patients up to 440 lbs. accommodated (Plymouth)
Joyce Landscaping
Full service residential and commercial landscape company offering custom design and all facets of construction and maintenance services. Servicing clients throughout southeastern Massachusetts. (Barnstable)
IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COMMENTORS & BLOGGERS: CapeCodToday now requires a one-time validation of your account email. When logging in or registering for the first time, you will be emailed a link to click that will validate your email and complete your login. The link in the email must be clicked in the same session when you are logged into the site for security purposes (i.e. retrieve the email right away and do not close your web browser).

This is a one-time-only process (or if you change the email on your account), and will help CCToday keep out the spammers. If you cannot validate your email because it is invalid, and you are a legitimate user, feel free to contact us and we will update your account to your current email.

Please Login or Register to leave a comment. There are 2,251 registered commenters!

CapeCodToday requires readers register an account with us in order to post comments. Become a trusted commenter and receive the benefits of posting instantly throughout the site. It's quick and easy!

Please note: If you are a CapeCodToday registered blogger, you can use your blogger login. Your login for the blogs is separate from your CapeCodToday main site login (if you have one).

Previous/Next posts in this blog

About This Blog

Greg O'Brien Greg O'Brien is editor and president of Codfish Press, a publishing and political /communications strategy company. He is the author/editor of several books, a Boston Metro newspaper columnist, a contributor to New York Metro, a freelance writer for national and regional magazines, a television script writer and a documentary producer.

He has contributed in the past to Boston Magazine, the old Boston Herald American, USA Today, The Arizona Republic, the Los Angeles Times, the Associated Press, UPI, and is former editor and publisher of The Cape Codder newspaper and a former managing director of Community Newspaper Company of Boston.

He comments here about Boston and the world beyond, and about Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket on his local blog, Codfish Press.

- site sponsors -


CCT Blog Tools

Login to comment or manage your blog:

Username: 

Password:     

Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!

Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?

If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.

Blog Newsfeed

CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.

Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "Boston Cod" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.

RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3