Fair 34°F Fair [Forecast] :: Thursday, January 8th, 2009
Vacation Info Wedding Info NEW! Kids & Parents

Cape & Islands News

What do YOU think about these stories? You can add your thoughts on this story by leaving a comment below.
Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Patrissi Landscaping
Cape Cod residential landscaping, landscape construction, irrigation, stonework and outside lighting. (Harwich)
Herb's Guitar Suit
Protect your guitar's finish!. The Suit prevents dings, dents, scratches & gouges. Machine washable, engineer designed and made of high-quality microfibre. Protect your investment and order your Suit today! (Falmouth)

Wind energy expected to grow dramatically

Major New Technical Report Finds Wind Can Provide 20% of U.S. Electricity Needs by 2030
U.S. Department of Energy analysis finds that wind can be major contributor to energy mix

Cape Cod once had a thousand windmills along our shores, & may again be Amerca's leader in wind power.Wind power is capable of becoming a major contributor to America’s electricity supply over the next three decades, according to a report released today by the U.S. Department of Energy. The groundbreaking report, 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply, looks closely at one scenario for reaching 20% wind energy by 2030 and contrasts it to a scenario of no new U.S. wind power capacity.

2030_wind_power_1371_01 "DOE's wind report is a thorough look at America's wind resource, its industrial capabilities, and future energy prices, and confirms the viability and commercial maturity of wind as a major contributor to America's energy needs, now and in the future," DOE Assistant Secretary of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy for the U.S. Department of Energy Andy Karsner, said. "To dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance our energy security, clean power generation at the gigawatt-scale will be necessary, and will require us to take a comprehensive approach to scaling renewable wind power, streamlining siting and permitting processes, and expanding the domestic wind manufacturing base."

Included in the report are an examination of America’s technological and manufacturing capabilities, the future costs of energy sources, U.S. wind energy resources, and the environmental and economic impacts of wind development. Under the 20% wind scenario, installations of new wind power capacity would increase to more than 16,000 megawatts per year by 2018, and continue at that rate through 2030.

“The report shows that wind power can provide 20% of the nation’s electricity by 2030, and be a critical part of the solution to global warming,” said AWEA Executive Director Randall Swisher. “This level of wind power is the equivalent of taking 140 million cars off the road,” he said. “The report identifies the central constraints to achieving 20% - transmission, siting, manufacturing and technology - and demonstrates how each can be overcome. As an inexhaustible domestic resource, wind strengthens our energy security, improves the quality of the air we breathe, slows climate change, and revitalizes rural communities.”

The report finds that achieving a 20 percent wind contribution to U.S. electricity supply would:

  • Reduce carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation by 25 percent in 2030.
  • Reduce natural gas use by 11%;
  • Reduce water consumption associated with electricity generation by 4 trillion gallons by 2030;
  • Increase annual revenues to local communities to more than $1.5 billion by 2030; and
  • Support roughly 500,000 jobs in the U.S., with an average of more than 150,000 workers directly employed by the wind industry.

At 20% of electric power generation, significant growth in the manufacturing supply chain would create jobs and remedy the current shortage in parts for wind turbines.

Reducing the use of natural gas could save money for consumers due to the resulting downward pressure on the price of natural gas, according to AWEA.

"The report correctly highlights that greater penetration of renewable sources of energy - such as wind - into our electric grid will have to be paired with not only advanced integration technologies but also new transmission," DOE's Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Kevin Kolevar said. "In many cases, the most robust sources of renewable resources are located in remote areas, and if we want to be able to deliver these new clean and abundant sources of energy to population centers, we will need additional transmission."

“We must look at meeting future electric demands in a cost-effective way,” said Suedeen Kelly, FERC Commissioner. “The 20% wind scenario would only cost 2 percent more than the cost of the baseline scenario without wind. At 50 cents per month for the average ratepayer, that is a small price to pay for the climate, water, natural gas, and energy security benefits it would buy--and it does not even count the stability provided to consumers by eliminating fuel price risk.”

“Though economic and other factors will ultimately determine our energy future, we believe the 20 percent wind scenario is feasible, but only with a major national transmission highway system. Delivering power from the best windy regions to the growing urban supply requires a bigger, stronger transmission system. Strong regional and interregional planning as well as broad allocation of costs will allow the United States to rely on a broader diversity of generation resources," said Mike Heyeck, Senior VP of AEP Transmission.

The report comes at an important time in wind development. In 2007, wind was one of the fastest growing sources of electricity in the nation, second only to natural gas for the third consecutive year. According to an AWEA report released last week, the U.S. wind energy industry continued new installations at a breakneck pace in the first quarter of 2008, putting 1,400 megawatts (MW) or approximately $3 billion worth of new generating capacity in place--enough to serve the equivalent of 400,000 homes--coupled with investment in 17 new manufacturing facilities over the past year.

“Wind is an important part of BP Alternative Energy’s business and of BP’s diverse energy portfolio. Siting and wildlife issues will be a challenge, but AWEA and industry leaders are committed to working with stakeholders to make wind the environmental electricity choice,” said Bob Lukefahr, President, Power Americas, BP Alternative Energy North America. “This report underscores the benefits of diversifying our electricity sources. Growing to 20% wind requires investment in new manufacturing and capital projects, an estimated 500,000 jobs, and brings rural economic development across the country.”

Background

In 2006, President Bush articulated a national imperative for greater energy efficiency and a more diversified energy portfolio. Citing wind energy as part of the solution, he noted that areas of the nation with good wind resources could satisfy up to 20 percent of America’s total electricity demand.

Subsequently, government and industry came together to thoroughly explore the feasibility of generating 20 percent of U.S. electricity from wind by 2030 and produced this joint report to aid policy-makers and the public in better understanding the issues, investments, and likely outcomes associated with pursuing this objective.

To download the full report, please go here.

42 comments
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.

05/12/08 @ 6:32 pm
Peter Kenney [Member] writes:
Yes but,why do people persist in talking about wind power as if there is no differenec between land based and offshore wind? The differences are huge and the costs asociated with them is often the death knell for an otherwise good wind project. G.E. is probably not going to manufacture the 3.6 mg units touted by Cape Wind and it is not yet clear that Siemens will sell their 3.6 units in the U.S. Two other major offshore wind initiatives are dead and a third, Delmarva is awaiting far-from-certain legislative action by states. The U.S. is actually leading the world in construction of new wind farms...China close behind...but it is all land based.

The world's largest wind turbine manufacurers are Siemens in Germany and Vestas in Denmark. Siemens is building a plant in the northern Great Plains and G.E, has built a factory in China...they did $6 billion last year in turbines @ $1 billion profit...mostly in China and India and all land based.

What happened to G.E. at Arklow Bank? What about the cancelled London Park?
Land based is not offshore!
05/12/08 @ 6:45 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
I am all for giving wind power a chance to produce the benefits promised.

If it is properly sited within the guidelines mandated by US Fish & Wildlife.

Is there a money back guarantee? Will Jim G give back his windfall monetary gain if he doesn't deliver as promised?

Cape Cod will be left holding the empty bag. He will be laughing all the way to the bank.

Be careful what you wish for.
05/12/08 @ 7:48 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
The land/sea issue has been covered before. But, for you Peter...

In a nutshell, the average velocity of wind over water is greater than that over land. There are no obstructions in Horseshoe Shoal to slow the wind down.
Even a few extra knots of wind offer much greater returns on investment. Horseshoe Shoal is above water in areas at low tide so this is much more cost effective than out in the Atlantic (as you must know). It is funny how the Bush administration is ahead of the game here while liberal lion Ted Kennedy is against it.
05/13/08 @ 5:38 pm
capecrusader [Member] writes:
NIMBY
Not In-view of My Big Yacht...

*Thurston Howells III voice*
05/13/08 @ 5:57 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Imco35..."Horseshoe Shoal is above water in areas at low tide so this is much more cost effective than out in the Atlantic (as you must know)."

Cape Wind has stated they would not require dredging or the necessary permits.

In light of your statement how might this be accomplished? With helicopters?

Or might this be another swindle? Same game plan, just a different player.
05/13/08 @ 7:35 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
Maverick - the largest threat to Stellwagon Bank is commercial and recreational fishing. Every single one of the 829 square miles of the preserve has been stirred up by bottom trawlers. So you think the boring required for wind turbines is somehow a major issue?
05/13/08 @ 7:52 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Imco35...please don't spin. I thought you were above that?

I never mentioned Stellwagon. And I didn't mention boring.

I simply said that Cape Wind has stated "no dredging would be required". And I asked how that could be accomplished based on your statement.

Please give an honest answer with no crap. Or are you part of the Peck facade?
05/13/08 @ 8:23 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
I think you understand the point. This project doesn't happen in a vacuem. You can't dredge without a permit. That' pretty clear. Noone's going to dredge without the proper permits and oversight. Can't imagine folks like you are going to let that one go. While you are on the subject of dredging, why dredge marinas? who f'in cares what some yacht owners need. Do you have a problem with SOS/Alliance founder (Wayne Kurker) being allowed to dredge this year in 16 acres of Hyannis Harbor? http://www.mass.gov/envir/mepa/pdffiles/certificates/032108/14187enf.pdf and http://www.appliedcoastal.com/Projects.php?number=99-10&category=CC
05/13/08 @ 8:27 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
Here's one that was out last year. You don't seem to have a problem with the rich folks dredging... http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/regionalnews/20070517-frank.html
05/13/08 @ 8:36 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
Specifically,
the applicant proposes to mine approximately 2.6 million cubic yards of material from
approximately 195 acres within Nantucket shoals, and place sand within an area of
approximately 120 acres. Once equilibrium is reached, approximately 287 acres for intertidal
and subtidal habitat would be impacted. Of this area, 105 acres consist of cobble habitat. In
order to offset project impacts, the applicant proposes to place 28,000 concrete railroad ties as
artificial reefs within an area of 58.9 acres.
05/13/08 @ 8:37 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
Holy crap. That's a lot of dredging.
05/13/08 @ 8:47 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Hello!...that is a lot of crap to digest in the middle of American Idol.

Back shortly.
05/13/08 @ 8:49 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Imco35...do your last four posts require a dredging permit?
05/13/08 @ 8:50 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
imco35...are you suggesting you have a problem with rich folks?
05/13/08 @ 8:52 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
Not really. My problem is that you are making unsubstantiated claims about the Cape Wind project which would power 75,000 homes on Cape Cod but make no mention of this MASSIVE dredging project. Think about it, the times does over 100 editorials bashing cape wind and we hear ZIP about this HUGE dredging project.
05/13/08 @ 9:13 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Imco35...forgive me. I am now into "Dancing With the Stars".

Would you please comment on the dredging required by Cape Wind.

Thanks,
Jack
05/13/08 @ 9:25 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
Ever hear of a jack-up rig Jack? That's how you install turbines without dredging...
"The vessel will have six jack-up legs so it will be able to provide a stable work platform in waters up to as shallow as 9 ft. (3 m), and as deep as 115 ft. (35 m). "
http://www.marinetalk.com/articles-marine-companies/art/Worlds-First-Wind-Turbine-Installation-Vessel-IHC00285839TU.html
05/13/08 @ 9:38 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Imco35...I have read all about my namesake rig. You stated parts of Horseshoe were above ground at certain tides.

And I asked if dredging would be required.

Seven posts/comments later you still haven't answered my question.

Please go back to CCT and BS those folks. When anyone asks me an honest question I give a simple and honest answer.
05/13/08 @ 9:42 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
ACCORDING TO CAPE WIND - NO DREDGING REQUIRED - JACK.
05/13/08 @ 9:45 pm
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
That Jack-up rig will be all over Horseshoe Shoal like white on rice. Why dredge when most if not all of the turbines can go in so easily?
05/13/08 @ 10:01 pm
maverick [Member] writes:
Thanks Imco35...you are now on record as well as Cape Wind that no dredging will be required. Am I correct?
05/13/08 @ 11:31 pm
smahkcep [Visitor] writes:
Personally, I could care less if it was necessary to do a *hit pile of dredging to get the turbines in...

A peak at the bottom as it stands is adequate testament to how the commercial fishing industry treats this "National Treasure"... This "Natural Marine Santuary"...

Talk about a bunch of BS!

CAPE WIND drives 130 monopiles into the seabed and runs a bunch of cables between ONE TIME.

The DRAGGERS, DREDGES... Ply, Rape & Plunder NANTUCKET SOUND every day year round. Leaving NOTHING but a trashed seabed below.

To suggest that CAPE WIND will "DESTROY" Nantucket Sound...

Not only *isses me the pluck off.

It shamefully contrasts the hypocricy, the igonrance, stupidity & lame self-centered arguments of the opponents.
05/14/08 @ 6:17 am
bittersweet [Member] writes:
The people against the wind farm...what really are the motives for it? Since you really haven't minded the "destruction" of Nanucket Sound so far....geuss when certain people do it, it's ok?
Why has the fishing industry, tourist industry been allowed this free pass to pollute and poison the waters?
Is it just that we can't see the destruction that makes it ok?
Whole mountaintops are ruined...is that ok? Think people like seeing that? Like thinking about what has been done to this Earth? It' ok since it's underwater, and we can't see it?
Filthy,dirtysmoke that we breathe, not to mention the birds.
You wind-farm detractors still drive SUV's, speed-boats,live in huge houses....When do you actually do something besides hinder progress? Progress that is long overdue thanks to our rapacious appetite for oil???
Everyone in the world is paying for our greedy way of life.
And we don't have to?
Maybe it's time to pay the piper...and maybe it's time to see what's going on already with polluting the Sound?
How pristine is it really?
05/14/08 @ 9:14 am
Buzz [Member] writes:
bitter,

The fishing industry has been decimated by years of restrictions and limitations and self-regulation. Maritime environmental laws and rules have added cleaner engines and stricter waste dumping regulations. So I guess, to answer your question, quite a bit is being done.

All those opposed to the wind farm are not "rich capitalist pigs" as you may think. Some of us are hard working stiffs. Others just appreciate the unspoiled beauty that has existed for eons.

Were you complaining when mountain tops were being harvested for coal? Or where you comfortable in your warm house?
05/14/08 @ 10:54 am
lmc035@gmail.com [Member] writes:
About waste dumping, nothing has changed in Nantucket Sound. Vessels can still discharge raw sewage there and will be able to do so legally for years to come. What happens when viagra shows up in fish?
05/14/08 @ 12:24 pm
smahkcep [Visitor] writes:
"What happens when viagra shows up in fish?"...

Not going near that one Imco35...

That's a question that only Monpo knows for sure.
05/14/08 @ 12:26 pm
smahkcep [Visitor] writes:
er '...a question that only Monpo knows -the answer to- for sure.'
05/14/08 @ 12:42 pm

An unexpected error has occured!

If this error persits, please report it to the administrator.

Go back to home page

Additional information about this error:

Requested User does not exist!