Fair 41.0°F Fair [Forecast] :: Saturday, November 21st, 2009
Vacation Info Wedding Info Kids/Parents NEW! Pets

CapeCodToday Blog Chowder

Welcome to CapeCodToday's Blog Chowder! This page aggregates the most recent postings from all the CapeCodToday bloggers for your convenience. Bookmark this page or see below left for RSS options.

Latest comments

Please visit these local CapeCodToday sponsors:
Cape Dreams Building and Design
Whether building a major addition or remodeling your kitchen, we work with you from the ground up. We start with the basics and customize the project so it's tailored to fit your needs. Our goal... 100% satisfaction. (Orleans)
Sun-Sational Tanning
"Learn about the benefits of tanning and the myths." Tan in any room at anytime at our Sandwich or Mashpee locations. Seven days a week, two great locations. One price. No appointment... great tan! Call us for monthly specials! (Sandwich)
11/08/06 @ 11:42 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: So What Would Constitute a Blowout?
KMA (registered user) writes:


"when you will sacrifice honesty to further an agenda."

You ask Rove, I'll ask Kerry.

Both sides are guilty of that, and that is the problem in politics today. It's about the party not the Country.
11/02/06 @ 3:39 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Wind Farm
Clever Capecodguy, Good to see what I write is so good, you find the need to copy it. Very original.
11/02/06 @ 3:09 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Wind Farm
Jamie,
lmc035@gmail.com usually rambles from A to Z without making any sense. Best thing to do is, pat him on the head and send him on is way, it's not worth the time to try and make any sense of anything he writes.
11/01/06 @ 2:22 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
captain quahog - writes

Who gives a rats ass what JK thinks.

I bet the troops and their families do. And any other Patriotic American.
11/01/06 @ 1:55 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
i'm not anonymous (registered user) writes:


Kerry isn't a disgrace. Bush is a miserable failure. go ahead, type "miserable failure" into google.com and click "i'm feeling lucky". I dare you.
Oh Boy! Isn't that cute!

Well, if Kerry isn't a disgrace why is his own Party distancing themselves from him??? Let's see Kerry now will not appear with Tim Walz of Minnesota, Bruce Braley in Iowa asked kerry not to campaign with him, Bob Casey in Philadelphia, Harold Ford Jr. in Tennessee, Jon Tester in Montana and the list goes on. When you own party is distancing themselves from you, I'd call that a disgrace.
11/01/06 @ 1:28 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
What is Capewind? Where is it? I don't see any windmills on Horseshoe shoals? What's the delay?
11/01/06 @ 1:16 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
John Kerry is a complete disgrace, I guess the troops have already heard of his great support for them.
http://hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/carry-large.jpg
11/01/06 @ 1:13 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
Well since Bush had a higher GPA at Yale, then the disgraced senator, why should he be joking that he is smarter than him???
11/01/06 @ 12:56 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
Good one James. I voted for the war, before I voted against it. Check up and see how many of your Democratic friends should be impeach too who voted for the war.
11/01/06 @ 12:51 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
We'll see who's cooked. It's been how long since this process started, and all I see out there is a lonely test tower. How much electricity is that producing?????
11/01/06 @ 12:47 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Because were no pre-existing guidelines in place as far as competitive bidding etc...

EXACTLY, because Capelandgrab is exploiting a loophole in the guidelines. Should we say the Cart before the horse or horse's ***. The process should have guidelines in place before any applications reviewed. It should be treated just like all other industry leases, like the gas and oil leases. That is what makes our capitalist system work, competition. Which did not happen here. Can you say special interest lobbying?????
11/01/06 @ 12:27 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
If allowed to build there, should be competive bidding like all other offshore leases.
11/01/06 @ 12:19 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
KERRY: I did, I said it was a botched joke, of course I’m sorry about a botched joke. You think I love botched jokes? It’s pretty stupid.

I don't see that as an apology to the troops, so let's not say he apologized.
11/01/06 @ 11:38 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
kelleryjones, your liberal views are shining thru. If this isn't just political posturing and a democratic support issue. Tell us the great Accomplishments that the disgraced senator has done for our country and/or Massachusetts since he's been in the senate for over 20 years.
11/01/06 @ 11:14 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
I think the point that Neil is making, is Horseshoe Shoals is a unique place, and if a windfarm was ever allowed to be built there, it should be competitively bid upon, not given to a private developer, for their personal profit, in a sweetheart, back door, special interest addition, to an energy bill. It should be like all other offshore leases, and competitively bid upon
11/01/06 @ 11:04 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
This is too serious of a subject to joke about. If he was truly a soldier, and not an elitist snob, The disgraced senator should know better.
11/01/06 @ 10:43 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
How long should Saddam been able to snub his nose up at UN inspectors? 13 years wasn't enough time for him to comply? Let us not forget that the intelligence at the time, showed that Saddam had WMD's, and most in the country though the same. And even the disgrace of a senator (John Kerry) voted for the war, before he voted against it. It's easy to Monday morning quarterback the President, but don't say he dragged us into war under false pretense. The just plain Kerry-speak.
11/01/06 @ 9:42 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
We all can agree that capewind is bad news, and soon to be old news, when they get denied by MMS. Happy days!
11/01/06 @ 9:35 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: A Call for Senator Kerry's Resignation!!!
John Kerry is a disgrace to our State, it is a shame to have him represent us in Washington. He is too arrogant to realize what those words do to the family of a son or daughter who has been killed or maimed over there. Our young men and women serving are educated, trained and sacrificing to serve their country. He's using them for his own political agenda....as usual. I think the Senator is an elitist snob, and should resign immediately.
10/31/06 @ 5:40 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Straight for the horse's ***, Stephen Peckham himself, who knows more about our electrical generation needs then the Chief Executive Of the Grid.
10/31/06 @ 3:48 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Moses, Barbara knows more about the subject then you'll ever know. Not sure you have the IQ to understand it. We can see by your ramblings, that you really have no idea what your talking about, you just Drink the CW Kool-aid, and believe that the building of CW will save the world. I think your the one with the myopia, since you are all for this project, but yet don't offer any ideas or renewable energy projects in the Rhode Island area, So until then, let's not talk about myopia.
10/31/06 @ 2:38 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
So when is Block Island getting a windfarm. Get out there Moses, Spread the word, that Rhode Island wants windmills everywhere! I'm sure all people in Rhode Island will support you views!
10/31/06 @ 1:47 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Times to endorse Kerry Healey this week
Well, if Editorial bias's are turning readers off, this website better watch out.
Nice touch with the Jihad against CW.
10/31/06 @ 1:33 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
And Jim Gordon and his investors live in a homeless shelter. I don't believe wind farms are going to be the answer to our energy independence. However, with the proper community involvement, and paying of fees to the communities affected, I would support it. But I don't support a developer using loopholes in regulatory framework, or no bid leases to make money for a private, for-profit developer at the expense of the community and taxpayers.
10/31/06 @ 1:16 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Not sure why your bring classes into the subject, No here ever siad that they are against renewable energy, Just the sitting of an unreliable, engery experiment on horseshoe shoals. try to kkep on subject, but I guess I'm asking the wrong person.
10/31/06 @ 12:45 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
lmc035@gmail.com You are clueless, the two projects are not linked one bit. If capelandgrab ever got approved, it would not change the need for another LNG Port. But as I have told you before to go back to Rhode Island many times, it seems quite obvious that cape wind doesn't matter to you because it's not near you, but the LNG project seems to be stirring NIMBY from you. Go figure!
10/31/06 @ 12:28 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
lmc035@gmail.com (registered user) writes:


AND BEST THING OF ALL, WE'RE GOING TO DONATE OUR REPORT TO MMS AND ANYONE WHO WANTS IT!


OH Boy! isn't that GREAT!
10/31/06 @ 11:47 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
The seals will move to horseshoe shoals, lounge on the tower bases, and eat all the birds that get killed from the windmills.
10/31/06 @ 11:11 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Moses you jump from one delusional topic to another. Do you have ADD? I have narrowed down your financial gains angle. You know that this industrial project will create such a navigational hazard in the sound, you hope ships will be required to subscribe to your vessel tracking business. The cats out of the bag Moses. Follow the money trail....... By the way, besides trying to financially gain from this project, tell us all the renewable energy projects that you and the state of Rhode Island are undertaking.
10/31/06 @ 10:04 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Moses give it a break. If Cape wind ever got built it would not change how many old ships got decommissioned. So give it a break please!
10/31/06 @ 9:33 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
More scare tactics Moses? like the building of capewind would changed this in anyway. Is your business in trouble??? Seems like your working for capewind now, drinking their Kool-aid and using the same scare tactics that their marketing team has been doing since the start of this land grab attempt.
10/31/06 @ 9:10 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Of course, Deval Patrick offered his endorsement of Cape Wind thinking that it would be the first commercial wind "farm" in the U.S. And, Patrick demonstrates a predilection to support the scurrilous, and then "forget" about it.
That is very interesting Barbara, Deval does seem to be distancing himself from Capewind, He continues to mention renewable energy, but it must make you think the Senior Senator might have his ear about Capewind.
10/30/06 @ 4:41 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Thanks for your wonderful opinions lmc035@gmail.com , but some of us feel that Horseshoe shoals is the wrong place for this unreliable, energy experiment, with all the profits going to a private developer, for their personal gain, at the expense of the tax payers both Fed and State who with be giving Jim Gordon their money.
10/30/06 @ 4:26 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
lmc035@gmail.com
Like my friend's dad said, if you are going to be stupid, you better be tough

I guess your a tough guy!
10/30/06 @ 4:16 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Windbag, nice to see you said START, because if capelandgrab ever got built, it would not shut down any other existing plants. Who's to say the existing plants will not keep running full bore to export electricity to other areas? how does that help us. Talk to me when you can come up with a project that would be reliable enough to shut down the dirty plants you talk of, because until then, you have not reduced any pollution for Southern Mass, but now we get destroy nantucket Sound too!
10/30/06 @ 4:05 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
lmc035@gmail.com you seem to know alot about marine shipping, you wouldn't be in support of this to help your marine shipping business, Would you?
10/30/06 @ 3:52 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
SMPeckham (registered user) writes:


P.s. Before I get back to work...

I encourage everyone to check out the MAP... Which accompanies the article that StopCapewind has so thoughtfully suggested...

This map/chart... Locates the proposed power plants in the Northeast area.

Please go look at it, and then realize that Southeastern Massachusetts Doesn't need new energy generation plants, because Southeastern Massachusetts is an electricity exporter. And other developers (unlike Capelandgrab) are smart enough to realize that Southeastern Massachusetts is a poor location for a new power generation facility, given documented congestion problems for grid connections.

Try again Windbag!
10/30/06 @ 3:32 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
lmc035@gmail.com we go back to how you expect to link up to the grid, without going into Mass state waters, That's going to be one long cable to RI. The developer is exploiting a loophole in federal waters, which is surrounded on all sides by state waters. Show me one other project in federal waters, that is then surrounded by state waters on all sides. This is a loophole that Capelandgrab is trying to exploit and we all know it.
10/30/06 @ 3:17 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Running from the issue at hand. You and your fear mongering Capewind supporters have been climbing the highest trees, to tell all the tales of the rolling blackouts to come, and now the Chief Executive from the power grid says we are all set, you try and weasel out of this question, with more fear mongering. It must be tough to remember which side of your mouth to talk out of, or in your case, which end it comes out of.
10/30/06 @ 2:50 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
So what's your point Windbag????

Where does it say without capewind being built, we will have rolling blackouts in the future???

What is your point.
I don't see anything about the fear mongering rolling blackouts that you have been trying to scare the public with?
10/30/06 @ 2:45 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
lmc035@gmail.com Go back to Rhode Island and enjoy your turbine. Better yet Call Jim Gordon any tell him Rhode Island wants his business. Nantucket Sound is not for sale. And tell everyone the real reason you support this project, so it increases shipping and you hope to profit from that, since that is the business you are in. Follow the money trail to the Capelandgrab supporters. And then you have Stephen Peckham who knows more about the NE electrical grid, Then the Chief Executive of ISO New England.
10/30/06 @ 1:21 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
"But now the ISO counts 38 projects representing 5,700 megawatts of new electrical capacity -- equal to 20 percent of the region's current peak summer demand -- that are either proposed, approved, or under construction. A thousand megawatts can meet the demand of about 750,000 homes."

So the great Stephen Peckham knows more about the NE electrical grid then the Chief Executive of ISO New England, Gordon van Welie.
That's what you want us to believe?

and that's why you are a Radical Extremist on this issue. because you only see the information and study results that you want to see. The Chief Executive from the power grind tells us we are all set, but we should believe Joe smo stephen peckham, because his knowledge of the electrical grid is more abundant than the Chief Executive of the grid.
10/30/06 @ 12:22 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
Windbag, tell me what I misrepresented. I gave the link to the Whole article? Did I not?????? All we have been hearing from the Radical Extremist, such as yourself, about Capelandgrab, are the fear mongering blackouts, that have never materialize. Now you tell us that Gordon van Welie is wrong. This article states, From The Chief Executive of ISO that there are enough proposals in the pipeline, to support our needs. You would think the Chief Executive of ISO might Know a little more then James T.Brent or Joyce McMahon and even the great Stephen Peckham. You don't say??? Tell us why you know more then the Chief Executive of ISO???
10/30/06 @ 10:14 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
another example of their scare tactics.

CapeCodGuy (registered user) writes:

How about a posting of the report released by ISO NE about the need for more power plants?



Well let's read this article from the Boston Globe, date 9/25/2006. about how ISO New England believes there are plenty of power plant proposals in the pipeline.
Here is a quote from the article.
"Gordon van Welie, the chief executive of ISO, said in an interview that he is well aware that many of those plants will face long and potentially hopeless fights to get regulatory approval. But the overall ``pipeline" of power plant proposals is big enough, van Welie said, that he is considerably more confident that electric supplies will be sufficient to cover demand in the period between 2008 and 2010, and potentially beyond."

Please go read it, we will not run out of power when capewind in not built. Don't buy into the fear mongering.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2006/09/25/flurry_of_power_plant_proposals_offers_hope/
10/30/06 @ 10:04 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind Voters Guide
There is hope, by a few of the comments. Cape wind or no Cape wind, let us not fall in the radical extremism, that many people on this site have. To vote for a candidate based on his or her support of cape wind is irresponsible. Don't be coherest into voting for a candidate by the capewind radical extremism portrayed on this site. These capewind kool-aid drinking extremist are always going to have very clouded judgments and always see only the information and study results they want to see. They use scare tactics and sensationalism to bring attention to their cause. Similar to Greenpeace and PETA
10/18/06 @ 1:30 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: On the Campaign Trail - Part 2
Call Jim Gordon, He can give you a blueprint on how to steal Land and/or waterways.
10/17/06 @ 11:04 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: The view from The Vineyard... and everywhere else
When Bill Koch starts drilling in Nantucket sound, then I worry about him sharing his profits. I never said we shouldn't conserve energy or explore alternative energy generation, so stop playing the capelandgrab game that anybody who question this project is nimby. This project is in the interest of cape wind and it's investors and the rest of the people with their hands out, Mass Audubon, the electrical unions and such. Most of the people and or organizations promoting this, are doing it for there own interest, whether it be financial gains or other, not the interest of the community - Including Deval Patrick.
10/17/06 @ 10:37 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: The view from The Vineyard... and everywhere else
IF Capelandgrab ever got built, it will only reduce our oil imports by a very small percentage, so don't make it sound like we will not be importing oil. It would NOT shut down any power plants. Now there would be a need for more shipping . How would the turbines get to the sound??? Along with all the other materials needed to built it and maintain them. I have many concerns with this project, and the biggest one is the profiteering by a private for profit company at the expense of the public. If Jim Gordon and CW are the world savers that they claim to be, then they should offer to share the profit with the communities affected.
10/17/06 @ 9:09 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: The view from The Vineyard... and everywhere else
Shipping business slow again Moses. Trying to drum up business anyway you can. You only support this project so you can profit from the increased shipping needs. Call Jim and build it off the coast of Rhode Island if you need to increase business.
10/11/06 @ 3:00 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Our appetite for energy has to be curbed
Let us not forget that lmc035@gmail.com AKA Moses is in the Marine shipping business, and his reasons for drinking Capelandgrab Kool-aid, is purely financial, whether or not he will make money on Capelandgrab I don't know, He hopes by telling all the lies he has to promote Capelandgrab, the it will create the need for more shipping, and he hope to profit from it.
10/06/06 @ 10:02 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape Wind increases output, reduces lights
I hate to break it to you Mikewicz, but if cape wind ever got built, it would NOT put the canal plant out of business.
10/04/06 @ 2:56 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Dr. Strangelove
Give it a Break Solon, the worst offender of civil discourse is Windbag. He feels he can insult anyone anytime. Thank's for the English lesson, I'm sure you're only looking out for my best interest.
10/04/06 @ 2:00 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Dr. Strangelove
Windbag, the fact remains that your a fool, even the people on your side think your a fool. Does anybody like you??? Why don't you do us all a favor and put your head back where it belongs.
10/04/06 @ 1:49 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Healey was for it before she was a'gin it
What facts did Deval base his support on???? When all I hear in his letter, for the reasons of Mr. LaGuer innocents is letter writing. "None of it is as thoughtful, insightful, eloquent or humane as that I receive from Mr. LaGuer" What facts did Deval use to base his support on???
10/04/06 @ 1:42 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Healey was for it before she was a'gin it
Democrant - How come you haven't told us the facts about Deval's Support for Convicted Rapist Benjamin LaGuer?
10/04/06 @ 11:32 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Healey was for it before she was a'gin it
Democrant (registered user) writes:


Rather than make a wild guess, try and go get some facts

Democrant - Do Tell me the facts I'd love to hear them. Give us Deval's reasons for backing Benjamin LaGuer, who was found guilty of TYING UP and RAPING a neighbor for 8 hours in 1983. Here is one of Deval's letters..
I have never Met Mr. Laguer in person. But thanks to a lively exchange of correspondence over the years, I do feel I know him. I receive a crushing volume of mail, much of it from prisoners in facilities all over this country. None if it is as thoughtful, insightful, eloquent or humane as that I receive from Mr. LaGuer. Based on it he appears well prepared to make a positive re-entry and important contribution to the community of responsible citizens. I urge you and your colleagues on the Parole Board to act favorably on his application.
Do tell us the facts Democrant????????
10/04/06 @ 10:42 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Healey was for it before she was a'gin it
So what evidence did he have before the DNA evidence was in that he was innocent.
He says he never even met the guy, What prompted him to think that justice had not been served, and this man should be released? I'm going to take a wild guess. He was black. That's the scary part, he made his termination of guilt or innocence on race.
10/04/06 @ 9:40 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Incoming plane ... or geese ... run for your lives!
Windbag, you can go Pluck yourself, and if you like we can meet and discuss why you had this to say.

Achilles... I told you the guy was a plucking idiot.
10/03/06 @ 2:04 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Incoming plane ... or geese ... run for your lives!
Let's see who Capewind has paid off? Dick Armey,Pete Domenici,Jeff Bingaman,Charles Bass and etc.
10/03/06 @ 1:24 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Incoming plane ... or geese ... run for your lives!
Thankfully there are people out there who see capelandgrab for what it is, and fight fire with fire.
10/03/06 @ 12:08 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Incoming plane ... or geese ... run for your lives!
NO,NO,NO - Bobcat87 Capewind is here to Monopolize public land/waterways for their own private gains, not spend money! The DOD might not be as easily bought, like the rest of the so-called experts they have paid to tailor the findings in their favor.
09/29/06 @ 3:01 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Outsiders wanting in
Did Deval Patrick Call Fishermen Drug Addicts?

I read in the Boston Globe Editorials today, that Chef Jasper White asked the candidates in last Monday nights gubernatorial debate, What the candidates would do to protect our farmers and fishermen, while promoting sustainable fishing and agriculture. Deval Patrick answered that he would consider it, in part, As a social issue, and that if the fishermen were treated for their alcohol and drug addictions, that would help resolve issues devastating the industry.

I guess my question is, did he REALLY say this????
09/26/06 @ 7:32 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Not a good night to be Healey
The majority of the people on this website don't care if Deval pulls a Dukakis: with skyrocketing taxes, high unemployment, and a plummeting economy, all they care about is that Deval is for Cape wind.
09/24/06 @ 9:09 am
Then you try to redirect the fact that YOU DON'T SPEAK THE TRUTH, like all the rest of the cape land grab LIES! And talk about others being politicians, take a look in the mirror, better yet, you might not want to.
09/24/06 @ 9:01 am
I See your EATING your words again Windbag, What a surprise.
Then instead of admitting your WRONG as usual, you cry for another chance. Just like your going to cry like a baby when the whole project gets denied. BOO HOO!
09/21/06 @ 6:41 pm
You guys are really scraping the bottom of the barrel for some pro capewind propaganda here. The guy slipped on his boat on hurt himself, give it a break. You guys can come up with some more creative propaganda than this...........
09/12/06 @ 3:37 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Tilting at Windmills
lmc035@gmail.com writes:
You don't understand how destructive bottom fishing is so you won't believe me.
You've never set foot on a tanker or tug/barge and so you don't believe it is far more environmentally unsound than the wind mills...

HMMMM, That is the first I have heard of tankers and tug/barges doing bottom fishing. I love to see how they work? Get a grip lmc035@gmail.com, you have no clue what you are talking about.
09/01/06 @ 3:26 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Dear Lt. Governor, is lying to us worse than not knowing?
No one likes a: SMART ASS (ID unverified) writes:


Tell you what Cliff...

Let's give it the month of August ok?...

If the "~Lights (don't) go out in Massachusetts~"...

I will give serious consideration crossing over to the 'Dark side'...

Deal?...
Ok Peckham you didn't promise, but that is what you said? and you were wrong on the Cliff part.
09/01/06 @ 2:21 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
John Coequyt, please tell us the inaccuracies. love to hear them. They won't add up to 1% of the inaccuracies that this article displays. Great if Greenpeace paid for Mr. Larsen’s travel, he came paid by someone supporting cape wind, and the fact that he said that Denmark had no bird kills, that is a lie, and shows he has no credibility to be honest and/or independent on the subject. He was merely a capewind marketer period.
09/01/06 @ 2:12 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Dear Lt. Governor, is lying to us worse than not knowing?
Hey Steven, how about those rolling blacks you promised sometime in August. I don't recall any? what happened???? Keep spinning your lies and Alliance smear campaign. Just like there were no blackouts there will be no capewind, your lies are being shown for what they are.
09/01/06 @ 11:38 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Dear Lt. Governor, is lying to us worse than not knowing?
Is she a liar, or just stupid?.

Kerry Healey knows where her money is coming from.

Kerry Healey knows who her Campaign Finance Committee is.
Kerry Healey was surrounded by and used Alliance material at her Sea St. Beach, Hyannis Press Conference. Her running mate, Reed Hillman, even handed her some and placed another in front of her rostrum as she spoke. These were specific displays many of the reporters in attendence had seen at countless prior Alliance or WindStop press conferences and meetings.

That makes her either a barefaced liar or stupid - take your choice.

Does capecodtoday spin the news in favor of capewind? Why

Capecodtoday knows where their money is coming from.

Capecodtoday knows who they must Kowtow to
Capecodtoday uses it's influence on the capecod community to post non-objective news story to favor Capewind any way they can. There are displays on this site everyday to back this up. Never see a story that shows the MANY negatives of this industrial complex trying to Monopolize Horseshoe shoals for the Financial gain of Jim Gordon and his Propaganda campaign followers
09/01/06 @ 11:09 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
CapeCodGuy (registered user) writes:


What about oil companies drilling in Alaska wildlife refuges?? or the gulf of mexico? or mining companies stripping mountains, or farmers grazing cattle on public lands. It happens all the time.... CW will pay a lease to use the watersheet just like fishermen pay for a liscense. Just because you dont like the project isnt enough of a reason to stop it. The reason Danes are cool with wind energy is because they care enough about the environment to sign the Kyoto protocols and even invest in their own machines.

Good try CapeCodGuy,Other areas of offshore development are REQUIRED to bid on the area, that is not happening here, don't say it happens all the time.
It obvious the Danes have a vested interest in spreading wind energy, like most of the other capewind puppets.
08/31/06 @ 8:59 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
Follow the money trail, like MOST of the other capewind propaganda campaign members.
08/31/06 @ 8:53 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
CapeCodGuy
Capri- in your previous post you called Jack Clarke an idiot, has a conflict of interest, and is a sellout. I dont have to resort to calling people names when I cant argue a point effectivley.

I don't know if Jack Clarke is an idiot, never met him, but he does have a conflict of interest, and he is selling out to capewind. That fact that they say they are a non profit has nothing to do with it. They still get salaries from MA and MA get money from CW.
08/31/06 @ 8:03 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Joe Lieberman-The Meaning behind the Politics
Jack as much as I disagree with you on the cw project, I could not agree with you more on this subject. Monponsett why can't you believe that this war is Not about oil, but about terrorism. Did you not see what happen on 9/11. Is it that difficult for you to comprehend that there are, and have been many Islamic terrorist plotting to take down the USA anyway they can. Once we went into their safe place of Afghanistan, we had to remove the welcome mat from Iraq for them. Saddam gave us the opportunity by invading Kuwait and then stubbing his nose up at us and the UN for 13 years. We had a reason to go to Iraqi, and saddum would have nuke us if he got the capability. We removed that ability for him to get it. It's a little harder to go into North Korean with no reason and a country that already has nukes. and to say Bush mislead is easy now. but most all in the world believed saddam had WMD's and I still believe he did, flew those to Syria in stripped out commercial jets. but that is pure speculation on my part. I pray to god the terrorist don't get nukes, because that will be the end of us all.
08/31/06 @ 7:26 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
Yes, YoungCaper, as Capri states this is not objective reporting in ANYWAY. It is mainly as Capewind Marketing arm. Try and find one article that does not try to show support to cape wind on this website. The closest you will come is they reported the Cape Codder Capewind poll and the survey did not favor capewind. They highlight the survey in a previous article, so I think they had no choice but to post them. However, they immediately put up another story saying the poll was invalid. There is no objective reporting on this site plain and simple.
08/31/06 @ 4:25 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
let's just hope it's not you, because you have no clue.
08/31/06 @ 12:40 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Joe Lieberman-The Meaning behind the Politics
Monponsett, you are way off the mark if you think Bush went to war to raise the price of oil. If it wasn't for 9/11, we would not be fighting this war. The rise in oil is the cause of many influences, and the war is one of them, but the president did not go to war to raise the price of oil. The war, Katrina, the change from MBTE to Ethanol, the growth and higher consumption of oil form china, Chavez being an unfriendly dictator, Iran's nuclear confrontation and that fact that oil had been relatively cheap for a while are few of the reasons, but bush did not go to war for oil.
08/31/06 @ 11:36 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
My point wasn't that the bird kill issue was the most pressing objection to this industrial complex, the point was if Mr. Larsen say's they have had zero bird kills, he is just plain lying, and that shows his credibility.

As far as samjaffe goes please don't come, less tourist sounds great to me.
08/31/06 @ 10:25 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Danes buying 1/3 of former electric price
thanks Capri, I wasn't able to make the talk, but I figured there was more to the story, then the capelandgrab side. The fact the Mr.. Larsen says they have had zero bird kills, makes it obvious that he is just a paid cape wind marketer, not an independent speaker.
08/28/06 @ 3:03 pm
It's quite ironic to see all the environmentalist align themselves with Jim Gordon, who's polluted this country for years, while lining his pockets the whole time. Now they want to be in bed with him. Now he wants to destroy Nantucket sound, I wonder how much money is enough for him.
08/28/06 @ 11:22 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: What's wrong with the CNC poll or survey?
The Blogfather, how do you respond to the comments by Dr Murray Johnston, about the CSI results being OVERSTATED & FALSE!!!!
08/28/06 @ 11:09 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: What's wrong with the CNC poll or survey?
Exactly, I think it is obvious that the majority of the people on the cape DO NOT WANT the CAPEWIND project. If you got to the Berkshires they are all for, because it doesn't affect them. Here is what Dr. Murray Johnson said about the CSI poll.

Re: New Poll: 81% of state, 61% of Cape favor Cape Wind
by drmurrayjohnson on Jun 08, 2006 - 01:28 PM
Unbelievable. Does ANYONE out there understand research & statistics. Obviously the Civil Society Institute DOES NOT. 9% of 54 people is an INVALID sample size. In order for a percentage of a sample to mean anything at all, there MUST be at least 100 people in the sample. Fine for the rest of the state with 546 people, BUT remember they don't live on CAPE COD. The survey ONLY sampled 54 people living on CAPE COD and based a percentage which means "x" number out of 100 people--AND THAT IS JUST OVERSTATED & FALSE!!!!
08/25/06 @ 6:12 pm
I wonder if the capewind poll results (CSI) steered Deval and Gabrieli the wrong way, with tilted results. Also by mentioning capewind in their ads vs just mentioning wind energy in general could backfire too. These results seem to be a positive for Reilly.
08/25/06 @ 4:14 pm
that was good Capri, I guess Capelandgrab could buy the result for this survey, like they did for the other one by they had tailored by CSI.
08/25/06 @ 3:57 pm
HMMMM Seems like when you ask people who might be more informed about the capelandgrab project, like the people living on the cape, the results are a little different then when you ask people living in the Berkshires. I wonder why??????? that other survey that was touted here was such a sham. I surprised capecodtoday put this up as a headline! the first story that I have seen them put up, that was not pro capewind.
08/25/06 @ 2:42 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Turn on, Tune in or Drop out
Capri, No we never did get those rolling blackouts that the capelandgrab supporters were praying for, and I'm sure they all put on every power consuming appliance they could, to try and help their cause. Is that the reason we have not heard from the Windbag (Stephen) has he gone into hiding from the shame and infamy?
08/23/06 @ 3:31 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
IF capelandgrab ever get's built, I wonder how long before they start falling over and killing people with the quality union employers working the job. Like the ones working the Big (Union money grab)Dig.
08/23/06 @ 3:25 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
No kidding Barbara, yes a win-win situation jim Gordon. A lose lose situation for taxpayers, both federal and state. Funny how lots of capewind supporters are union memebers looking for there next moneymaker.
08/23/06 @ 3:05 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
Jack, I believe you. People do funny things for money, compromising ethics is just a small one for some, I don't see you doing that, from what I have read about you. And it's actually been much more civilized without Stephen in here taking shots at everyone. It's quite ironic how most of us (ones with no financial incentive) are doing what we think is best for the Cape and Islands, but we don't agree!
08/23/06 @ 2:27 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
Imco35, the profits are going to capeland grab, not the taxpayers, big difference. It the profits were going to the taxpayers, then I would be less oppose to the project.
08/23/06 @ 2:19 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
Pay a lease, a NO bid lease, from a sweet heart deal. A special interest clause put into an energy bill. When anti-cape wind supporters tried this, cape wind cry foul, but it's OK for them to do. They will pay pennies in comparison to the taxes credits and subsidies they will receive from the taxpayers. It's a win for Capelandgrab, not for anyone else.
08/23/06 @ 2:01 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
No doubt Barbara. the cape land grab supporters need to wake up and see who the Onus should be on, no one asked capelandgrab to seek permits for this project, they are doing it for one reason and one reason only----To MAKE MONEY at taxpayers expense.
08/23/06 @ 1:44 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
lmc035, why should the onus be on the Steamship Authority. A Opinion statement form them should be fine. The private developer trying to monopolize public waterways for their own financial gain should be required to prove this statement inaccurate. the steamship authority has been operating in these waters for a long time. Capelandgrab is the newcomer to the party, and the onus should be put on them.
08/23/06 @ 1:19 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
Jack, it is not just the bloggers. The only headline news stories that are presented on this site are pro-cape wind. I presented a current news story to the editor, and ask why they don't put it on as headline. this was the response "We are reluctant to put this up as a headline since it concerns a particular wind farm in Alaska and its relevence to a proposed wind farm on the Cape
with different parameters is not strong enough." that reason is complete garbage. The only reason is doesn't go up, is Capewind is paying Capecodtoday money to promote cape land grab, and keep any opposition news story off the site.
08/23/06 @ 11:33 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
Why should I need too? A media organization should be independent and cover both sides of the story. If they choose to cover only one side or be bias towards one side, then that media organization should be required to fully disclose any financial payments from the company they are be compensated from. It's a shame Capecodtoday uses it influence to steer public opinion in favor of Capewind, only because they are being paid by capewind.
08/23/06 @ 10:30 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: FAA gives midwest wind farm "determination of no hazard"
Jack Coleman says "Lmco35 has a valid point and it appears to me that you are downplaying the extent to which financial considerations are playing a role in Steamship Authority and Hy-Line opposition to the wind farm."
Just like Capecodtoday should be honest, that financial considerations are the reason they only show one side of the story on this issue.
08/04/06 @ 4:45 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Otis give up power for Cape yesterday
Informative as usual Windbag, like the rest of Cape land Grab scare tactics. keep up the good work.
08/04/06 @ 4:36 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: What is POCLAD?
Could agree more, Take the conflict of interest out between the politicians and the lobbyist.
08/04/06 @ 4:21 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Otis give up power for Cape yesterday
Go back to your hole Windbag, We been thru this issue to death, but you just want to have the last word. Mass Audubon, IN THEIR OWN WORDS, got caught talking out of both side of their mouth, Before and After they cut a deal with Cape land Grab. They should now stay out of the issue, conflict of interest.
08/04/06 @ 3:22 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
So your saying you will not make any money if this project gets the approval? Or you will not be bidding, on any contracts. If more shipping is needed, it will help out the industry, It's called Supply and Demand.
08/04/06 @ 3:17 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
I'm sure Moses stands to benefit finacially if this get's the ok, So we see where his interest lies.
08/04/06 @ 2:59 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
Windsmart (registered user) writes:


editor... Who are you?
;~)
Good one Windy................
08/04/06 @ 2:58 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
Moses I really don't care who you are. so get over yourself. I will be happy to forward your info to Jim Gordon, so he can re-applies to have the wind farm put in federal water off the coast of RI.
08/04/06 @ 2:48 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
I am, who I am. as an old Sailor said! why are you so concerned about people's identity. How do we know who you are? you could have taken that name off of the website, to make it sound like you know what you talking about. I'm a concern citizen of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
08/04/06 @ 2:42 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
Ok then have cape wind run the cable thru federal water, without going into Mass water and bring it onshore in Rhode island. Smarty.
08/04/06 @ 2:38 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
Moses, 1 turbine, now we are comparing apples to apples. Give me a break. the great Governor of R.I has been a big supporter too. If all you Rhode Islander's want this windfarm so much, then put it off the coast of your State, Otherwise stay out of it.
08/04/06 @ 2:24 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
Moses, just to point out a little fact, last time I checked, Fall River was in Mass.
08/04/06 @ 2:20 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
Hey Moses. Put the windfarm off the coast of Rhode Island, and we will all be happy.
08/04/06 @ 2:12 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Audubon leader corrects Barbara Durkin
Windbag, wipes the tears from your eyes, since we didn't have any rolling blackouts and read the pdf that Barbara listed. I don't know how they can dispute something that is written in fact and still on there website. Mass Audubon must be run by Kerry's ex-campaign manager. When a Not for Profit like Mass Audubon jumps in bed with a developer they loss all credibility.
"Any fight against development, sprawl and commercialization anywhere is a legitimate Audubon activity because it helps birds everywhere. Any Audubon activity - regardless of motivation - that discourages us from stopping developers, is bad for birds and an anti-Audubon activity."
08/03/06 @ 9:10 am
Up early Windbag, crying in your coffee, since the lights didn't go out, and you can't pull your head out of your backend and yell the sky is falling ,and the rest of the Cape waterway Grab company lines. BOO HOO!
08/02/06 @ 3:55 pm
You know I was thinking the Same thing Capri. Windbag has been telling us the lights are going out for two days now, but yet in his own words "Not knowing a thing about how ISO NE deals with heavy demand situations could you clue me in on..." He shares with us that he has no idea what he is talking about. He just hoping the lights go out, so people will think we need Cape waterway Grab. I guess this proves he's just a lot of Hot air.
08/02/06 @ 3:37 pm
He's still trying to figure out how much taxpayer money, Jim Gordon will collect over 25 years, IF CW ever got built, but his calculator must not be able to go that high.
08/02/06 @ 2:31 pm
Chuck, lets assume the project gets built and the tax credits and subsidies stay in place as they currently are, how much taxpayer money would CW receive over the 25 yrs life of the project???
08/02/06 @ 2:10 pm
So it sounds like the peaker plant really won't operate, so obviously there won't be much pollution, Just Jim Gordon collecting more taxpayer dollars.
08/02/06 @ 1:43 pm
"I smell a communist in the mix" Capecodguy...why if someone doesn't think a privately own company should be able to steal 24 square miles of Public Waterways for their own person gain is someone a communist? Kind of like you being really pissed that Halliburton got a no bid contract in Iraq, Why should Cape waterway Grab be able to get this area in a no bid lease?
08/02/06 @ 1:05 pm
Unfortunately the damage will be done by then Capecodguy, and what union do you represent, the ones hoping to do the removal and installation? And let's see the money on the removal bond, that the world savior Jim Gordon is going to supply. The world saver for Cape Cod I guess, since he pollutes on all his other Industrial complexes. New and old.
08/02/06 @ 12:43 pm
So your logic Capecodguy is since there are already some commercial uses for the sound, lets put a permanently located industrial complex in the middle of it, and ruin it once and for all????
08/02/06 @ 12:10 pm
The view issue I could care less about, it would not bother me one bit. That's just another marketing scheme by Cape Waterway Grab, to make the opponents look bad. Maybe some people would care about the view, but I'm not one of them, It's the rest of the issues, that makes me opposed to the project.
08/02/06 @ 11:38 am
Capri, I agree That all any who oppose Cape Waterway Grab are to be commended, and Wayne was right there from the beginning. It's taking alot of effort to put on the fight this long, and with Cape Waterway Grab's deep pockets and appetite for Green Credit's they will stop at nothing to secure them. Thankfully they will fail.
08/02/06 @ 11:12 am
Should it be Cape Waterway Grab, Does that make you happy Windy?
08/02/06 @ 11:09 am
Your barking up the wrong tree windbag, I really have no connection to the alliance,(except that I fully support their efforts and do send in emails about articles and helpful suggestions) I have never meet any of the people except for good old Wayne, And if you think he's giving anything away for free, I've got another bridge to sell you, like the one Cape land Grab sold you.
08/02/06 @ 11:02 am
And what union do you belong to Windbag?
08/02/06 @ 10:59 am
I'm ready to negotiate a wager Windbag, but your changing of allegiance is of no worth to me, so what else do you suggest? How hot is it going to need to get for rolling black outs. If ISO says "We expect to have adequate resources for today's heat". And couldn't they buy some power on the open market if need be???? we are a long way from rolling blackouts. Just scare tactics from the Cape land Grab Crew.
08/02/06 @ 10:52 am
Windbag, your just trying to redirect off the issue. I wish we could change some of them too, especially the draggers, but as you say we got to start somewhere, and Cape Land Grab would be the only one Permanently installed, a much different animal.
You, in your delusional support for Cape Land Grab are the only ones spreading lies and scare tactics to try and sway the ignorant public your way.
08/02/06 @ 10:40 am
WindBag, First of all, what is your changing of Allegiance really worth, Nothing! I could care less, because you are radical in your beliefs and nothing will change them. So you offered nothing on your side. You came back and said:
Let's give it the month of August ok?...

If the "~Lights (don't) go out in Massachusetts~"...

I will give serious consideration crossing over to the 'Dark side'...

Deal?...
I say OK and then you come back again, with more ADD-ONs Has does that work??? Go Cluck yourself! As usual.

BESIDE THAT FACT THAT IF THERE WAS ANY DEAL YOU ARE LOSING. You couldn't find anyone to read the article in the globe to you???????????
08/02/06 @ 10:27 am
It's fine for a company to tried and make money, but should people interested in the resources that said company is trying to industrialize stand by while they destroy Nantucket sound? I think not.
08/02/06 @ 9:56 am
Capri, I was surprised to here Windbag worked. I took him for a trust fund brat, who has the time to do nothing but sit on his (IN HIS MIND) High horse and look and talk down on the common folk. I wonder if he might belong to The Electrical Union that is Supporting Cape Land Grab.
08/02/06 @ 9:37 am
WindBAG, I told you yesterday, that I am not Cliff. I did not run away, I was doing some other things, intead of sitting in front of the computer all night.
08/02/06 @ 9:32 am
WindBag, I see you have been blowing alot of Hot air as usual.
Agrees to a fair and reasonable deal?, I see how you make a deal, I said Deal: giving you the whole month, then you come back with a long list of add-ons. And all of those add-ons I can not control. REGARDLESS I wasn't talking about localized power outages as a result of transmission problems. I was talking about rolling blackouts as a result of not enough power available to deliver. And that is not the case. If you can read. go to today's globe. the B section. read the article about the Scorching forecast. In the article Ken McDonnell (Spokesman for ISO New England) States "We expect to have adequate resources for today's heat. Your usually attempts to use scare tactics( like the rest of the Cape Land Grab Crew), once again proves to be wrong.
08/01/06 @ 5:44 pm
Nice work on the bird kill data Barbara.
Funny that MA Audubon changes it's tune, after they cut a deal with CW.

WindSmart as much as I'd like to agree to your terms,(most of them are out of my control). And not sure your coming over to the good side is worth it. What fun would that be?????????
08/01/06 @ 12:04 pm
As we are here to keep the enemy honest as well. I don't doubt that you( and other cape wind backers) believe in this cause and are not doing it to make money, But I hope your honest and/or intelligent enough to admit that Cape wind in this for the money, and nothing else.
08/01/06 @ 10:44 am
I'm not Cliff.
But I'm willing to go along with the whole month. Deal.
08/01/06 @ 9:36 am
So if we don't have rolling blackouts today or tomorrow, you concede we don't need cape wind, WindBag ( I mean windsmart).
07/31/06 @ 4:22 pm
Monoponsett, Unfortunately neither one will happen, CW will not put any fossil fuel plants offline, nor will it save you any money. However, Wind power in the right location, with the benefits going to the taxpayers and not a for profit company, might find less opposition.
07/31/06 @ 4:02 pm
Monponestt, Anyone who doesn't buy the Cape wind spin, is a ignorant NIMBY'er. These fanatical cape wind backers are like PETA throwing red dye on people who wear any fur. They are right, and anyone who opposes them for any reason, is the enemy.
07/31/06 @ 3:36 pm
That's right Stephen I do know the answers to those question. There are other locations that a windfarm could be built, but it would cost more money to build them in more remote areas I.E less profit for the world savers, ( and they would most likely be in state waters not federal waters, so they wouldn't be able to exploit the loophole of no offshore wind farm oversight), so they don't want to consider them.
And yes they will do anything to make a buck, pollution or no pollution, as long as they can make money, and receive tax money from the taxes payers too. Cape wind's kind of like John Kerry, they talk out of both sides of their mouth depending on who's listening. and what green credits they can exploit.
07/31/06 @ 2:16 pm
Capri, Funny how Jack had to run when I asked him those questions, isn't it?
That is all Cape wind is about, making money. Not what they market themselves as, The good old green energy company that is going to save us from terrorism and global warming, if only we let them build this industrial complex. But if they can make a quick buck building a fossil fuel plant, who cares about saving the environment. Bottom line,whether or not cape land grab gets build, we will still be fighting terrorism, and we will still be polluting the air.
07/31/06 @ 1:50 pm
Answer me a couple of questions Jack.
1) If Horseshoe shoals is the only place to build a windfarm in Mass/Federal waters, how is wind technology going to move us away from our dependence on fossil fuel.
2) If Cape Wind is such the good old Green Energy company, why are they trying to build a new fossil fuel power plant in Chelsea? It wouldn't be to take advantage of the tax credits, like they are doing in Nantucket sound? would it be?
07/27/06 @ 10:42 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Cape fear: What is Sen. Kennedy afraid of?
This must be another cutting edge reporter. He probably chiseled the story into some fallen boulders from the old man. Hot off the press news story!
06/29/06 @ 4:24 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Delahunt, others, get free trips to Wequassett
I give you some meds, they way your mother take's your temperature Seneca.

If your able to read Senaca, I said " They got a sweet heart special interest deal, a back door line put into an energy bill to stop it from going to a public bid, like all other leases are made to do".
Tell me how The Alliance has not played by the rules?
06/29/06 @ 3:47 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Delahunt, others, get free trips to Wequassett
Commie, ok buddy. That's what cape wind wants. Public waterways should be free for all the public to use, not for cape wind to steal for nothing, and then use for their financial gains. If a company is to come in and steal public land and/or waterway they should be paying the public for that use. They got a sweet heart special interest deal, a back door line put into an energy bill to stop it from going to a public bid, like all other leases are made to do. They will be raking in state and federal tax credits and subsidies far outweighing, any money they will be paying for the lease. If It is EVER built it should be a public bid. If this is the only place to locate this wind farm than it should be worth even more
06/29/06 @ 3:16 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Delahunt, others, get free trips to Wequassett
Integrity and justice and Cape wind all in the same sentence. You really are
Blinded by your passion for this misconceived project. You buy their marketing material without any notion that cape wind in this for their own financial gains, and nothing else. If you can't see any negatives of this project, then you obviously can not see thru your cape wind brainwashing.
06/29/06 @ 11:04 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Delahunt, others, get free trips to Wequassett
Nothing to do with his opposition to the Cape wind Land Grab Attempt, just top notch reporting I'm sure.
06/29/06 @ 10:04 am
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Delahunt, others, get free trips to Wequassett
I find it interesting that Delahunt makes the headline, when his name is only mentioned a few times in the story. No coincidence that he is outspoken against the Land Grab. Seems to have started around the great liberal Tip O'Neil. I do not think it is right, it's a huge conflict of interest, but interesting which person makes the headline on this site.
06/27/06 @ 7:18 pm
Unfortunately, that's they political games are played, to try to get your message out, groups try to make headlines anyway they can to further their cause. Capewind plays the same game, don't even try to say they don't lie through their teeth to further their land grab.
06/27/06 @ 1:18 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Kerry touts wind power, but not in his own backyard
SMPeckham, That's the first time you made any sense.
06/27/06 @ 10:38 am
Stilgar with the sky is falling outlook you have, if we stay the course, we won't need the wind farm either, because anyone on the cape will be killed by all the pollution. But some constructive comments like a cape wide ban on nitrogen fertilizers, and the planning of town sewage systems to start to move homes away from septic systems would be a good start. Wavemaker, this is not a Pro-Cape wind site, and have receive no money in anyway from Cape Wind??? Yeah Right!
06/26/06 @ 1:36 pm
You blind Cape Wind backers need to realize that the view issue is minor compared to the many other reason to be against this project. I outlined a few specific examples last week, in comments on the article about the change to the clause in the Coast Guard bill, But it's seems that whenever questions are asked that shed a dark light on Cape Wind, those article mysteriously disappear. How much does Cape Wind donate to this website? Is this website just a marketing Front for Cape wind?
06/23/06 @ 10:51 am
And what if this doesn't work and Cape wind just walks away. Although a decommissioning bond will be required, it has never been clear how it will be funded or how much it will be or if it will even be adequate, especially if the project has a shorter-than-expected operating life. There are many reasons to question this industrial complex on Horseshoes shoals, I could go on with more examples, but running out of space is becoming quite annoying.
As for enviros promoting the project, they seem committed to America's eat-anything-you-want energy diet. Not a whisper from them about the smartest and cheapest alternative of all--energy conservation. In the best of all possible scenarios Cape Wind will assuage about one percent of New England's energy demand, producing about 170 megawatts. But a study commissioned by the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships reveals that achievable energy conservation could produce a demand saving of 4,317 megawatts by 2008. There are many unanswered question about this project, and Nantucket Sound is the wrong place for an experiment.
06/23/06 @ 10:50 am
Snake River-In this case the cost was the extirpation--now nearly complete--of the mightiest salmon and steelhead runs on the planet. Even the EPA, which officially rates the DEIS as "inadequate" and whose regional director remarks: "We do not believe an adequate mitigation or monitoring plan can be developed, nor can a decision be made as to whether the project is environmentally acceptable and in the public interest."
Substantial changes may occur in spawning, feeding, and juvenile development of the affected species and these changes may have far-reaching impacts on fisheries in other states as well as impacts on more local species, including birds, that rely upon them for food." And this warning from the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission: "If the project is allowed to go through, the potential for post-construction exclusion of fishermen from the project site is very high for the following reasons: All access could become restricted for security.. cont'd
06/23/06 @ 10:49 am
SMPeckham, you must be a politician, because you go on and on, but don't say anything. How does "Yes, wind is the CURRENT source that in time will BEGIN to move us away from our TOTAL dependence on FF's." answer "If Horseshoe shoals is the only location that is barely feasible ( In Massachusetts and/or federal waters) to make this work financially, Is wind power going to be the alternate energy source that is going to materially move us away from our dependence on fossil fuels. "
Why not START somewhere?... was your answer? I don't want to ruin Horseshoe shoals, one of the best fishing spots in Nantucket sound. In fact, the Sound has been designated as "Essential Fish Habitat" under the Fisheries Conservation and Management Act. I don't want to experiment with the first ever U.S. offshore wind farm, in a marine Habitat and cause irreparable damage. There are many reason to question this process, unfortunately we can't blind trust the agencies involved in these reviews. Look at the Snake River. Continue next post.
06/23/06 @ 10:47 am
First, I would like to apologize to Peter Porcupine for my use of a vulgar term. I meant it in a play on words kind of way, but I realize now it was inappropriate.
06/22/06 @ 4:12 pm
If I recall Cape Wind used a backroom lobbying effort to insert language into a energy bill that made it a no bid process. So I'd say that is a sweet heart deal, that equates to a give away. Why bid against yourself? Perhaps we should go back to why let a for profit company, take public land. And I asked a question before,( in another thread) that no Cape wind supporters wanted to touch. Maybe this time, I will get a response. If Horseshoe shoals is the only location that is barely feasible ( In Massachusetts and/or federal waters) to make this work financially, Is wind power going to be the alternate energy source that is going to materially move us away from our dependence on fossil fuels.
06/22/06 @ 2:38 pm
How come the GIVE AWAY PUBLIC LAND TO PRIVATE DEVELOPERS aren't having a group tree hug, with this news. Is there a worry about getting approval from the Coasties?
06/12/06 @ 4:08 pm
Stopcapewind [Member]
In response to: Wind-Power Projects Halted by political pressure
I'm sure Ted is worried about the lost of your vote Bob, He usually has a lot of competition running against him. People need to understand that there are numerous issues to oppose this project, and not see with blinders on, and thinks anyone who opposes this project is a NIMBY.
06/02/06 @ 8:39 am
And as Windmaker states " Oh yes, it's all about that obscene ROI of 25% over 22 years -- do you understand basic finance? It is the difference between bare feasibility and a non-starter. "
So if this is the only location that is barely feasible in Massachusetts and/or Federal waters to put this complex, is Windpower really going to be something that moves us away form our dependence on fossil fuels??????????????
06/01/06 @ 3:00 pm
CapeCodGuy That's a real good comparison. Street lights are not put in the middle of the road, they are put on the edges of the road. Obviously anyone can put the onus on the operator of the vessel, But in real world situations, a blanket statement from the Coast Guard rules book, doesn't tell the whole story. Ever since that rule went into effect, I'm sure no vessels have hit any other object, or other vessels.
And when the small private vessel avoid this area to stay away from the windmills, then it will push both private and commercial vessels in the same areas, where as if there are no windmills the private vessels will stay out of the larger shipping channels.
If Jim Gordon is doing this to save the world, As they market themselves, then he could give up some of his profits to run a longer cable to connect this project and move to a more remote location, such as Nantucket shoals.
06/01/06 @ 10:30 am
Have any of you capewind supporters navigated a vessel in Nantucket Sound, in zero visibility. Trying to navigate thru that windfarm field in zero visibility will be extremely dangerous. The more targets on a radar screen, makes picking out smaller private vessels very difficult. No the ferries won't be in there, but it is a very busy area for smaller vessels. People will die as a result of these towers being built. A less populated area would make more sense, for the first US offshore windfarm experiment. Just because people line up against the Capewind project proposed for Horseshoe shoals, doesn't mean that we are against offshore wind farms, just against the Horseshoe shoal location.
05/31/06 @ 4:44 pm
seneca, You must be advising Capewind, because the shipping channel for ships bound for New York is about 70 miles south of the island, If a ship is that far off track, It's probably Jim Gordon and Mark Rogers piloting that ship. And the shipping channel on the East side of Nantucket, in the location of Nantucket shoals is probably 35 miles east of Nantucket. Those two location would be much better, I.E. in much less congested areas for Marine and Aviation safety. The only problem with those location it will cost more money to connect to the power grid. So Capewind says they are not feasible, because they won't be lining their pockets with their 20% return on investment. This is not about Capewind being the Friendly environmental company, this is about GREED and only GREED!

About This Blog

Blog Chowder What's Blog Chowder?
Local ideas, opinions, humor, politics, musings & a few old salts thrown in for good measure. Thick, tasty and often pungent! You can visit all the Cape Bloggers below, browse blog archives, & even search our blogs. If you're interested in setting up a blog, it's free and easy. Just email us & we'll get you started.

Terms of Use/Disclaimer

- site sponsors -


CCT Blog Tools

Login to comment or manage your blog:

Username: 

Password:     

Become a CapeCodToday Blogger!

Are you passionate about your community? Do you blog or at least harbor thoughts of doing so?

If so, CapeCodToday.com would like to host your blog on our CapeCodToday weblog publishing platform.

Blog Newsfeed

CapeCodToday uses standard web "newsfeeds" (RSS) to automatically update the latest blog entries in your browser or newsreader.

Use any of the links below in your newsreader or web browser to get "CapeCodToday Blog Chowder" postings delivered to you, or use the RSS icon in your browser's address bar.

RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3