Our County Urgently Needs the Wind Farm

There is no national plan for energy beyond drilling for more oil and expanding dependence on foreign sources

By George M. Woodwell, Director of the Woods Hole Research Center 

Opponents of the planned wind farm on Horseshoe Shoal in Nantucket Sound have made much of the need for comprehensive planning to govern use of coastal waters.  Few question the need for planning for the protection of land and water, management of fish and fisheries, planning for energy, transportation, economic and technological development, agriculture, possibly aquaculture, recreation and more, or less, people. Unfortunately, we do not live with very many effective comprehensive plans.

We have managed to protect Georges Bank, one of the very richest fisheries in the world, from oil development, an extraordinary success that hinged very heavily on the value of the fisheries and the easily demonstrated hazards of developing oil wells in those shallow offshore waters.

We have also, under the pressures of rapid real estate development, managed to protect an extensive area of the Outer Cape as a national seashore. Many remember the arguments of local interests, real estate and other commercial interests, against a national park.

" The transition promises to leave opponents of the wind farm including Sen. Edward Kennedy, Gov. Mitt Romney, U.S. Rep. William Delahunt ... looking a bit foolish"

Compromises were made, and now those towns blessed with park lands have the lowest tax rates on Cape Cod and a guaranteed flow of business. The arguments against the wind farm have none of the urgency or clarity of the threats to a rich fishery or the irrevocable loss of land to real estate development.

In fact, the urgency runs in quite the other direction. There is no national plan for energy beyond drilling for more oil and expanding dependence on foreign sources. Nor is there a national plan for reducing reliance on fossil fuels to alleviate a global climatic catastrophe.

“If we have a world that is not working..., as we do with climatic disruption, we look for solutions....We look to the sum of local actions in restoring the integrity of nature to make a world that works.”
- George M. Woodwell

The wind farm that is being opposed will provide locally produced power equivalent to three quarters of the demand of Cape Cod, a significant shift away from fossil fuels. More than that, it is a clear sign that, in Massachusetts, we know how to plan for a better future.

In this case, the issue of planning has been addressed through the National Environmental Policy Act's comprehensive environmental impact statement, now under public review. The statement shows that the environmental changes attributable to the construction of 130 large wind turbines on Horseshoe Shoal will be minor to the point of insignificant.

No major fishery is at hazard. The Shoal is not a channel and the machines are not a hazard to navigation. Nor are they a source of pollution. They will, in fact, reduce a significant burden of pollution from fossil fuel used in power plants that bathe the Cape in their effluents.

The Environmental Impact Statement, unusually comprehensive, confirms that it is an excellent site for just the purpose proposed. The region and the nation need the relaxation of the power grid that the wind power will provide. A modest series of wind machines scattered over the Cape will add to the remainder of the Cape's full demand within a short time.

The issue is maturing rapidly as the public realizes the seriousness of the energy crisis and its climatic, economic and political consequences. The transition promises to leave opponents of the wind farm, including some of our political leaders - Sen. Edward Kennedy, Gov. Mitt Romney, U.S. Rep. William Delahunt - all of whom should know better, looking a bit foolish in their disparagement of the quite remarkable planning process that has gone forward under existing law.